Not all beautiful women are virtuous or diligent, but are beautiful in other ways.
Advertisement
by United Muscovite Nations » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:28 pm
by Sundiata » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:29 pm
by Cisairse » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:30 pm
Sundiata wrote:Cisairse wrote:You raise a valid point but I don't think the theotokos has ever worn a pantsuit, so I am not swayed.
But she is the most virtuous human being.
It's why all other women pale in comparison as she is perfect, fortunately they can resemble her through virtue and deeds. To tell you the truth, it's why I love her.
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:31 pm
by The Marlborough » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:31 pm
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:wtf did i start
by Cekoviu » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:31 pm
by Cisairse » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:31 pm
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:wtf did i start
by United Muscovite Nations » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:33 pm
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:34 pm
Cekoviu wrote:out of curiosity, i searched through pages 418-428 (10 pages, so 200 posts) to find what one could consider good faith political effortposts. here are the ones i found (more could be included that i didn't; it's definitely a subjective judgment. inclusion does not necessarily mean that i agree with the contents of the post.):
they total at 29, or 14.5% of the total, which means my estimate was nearly spot-on.
willing to do more in-depth statistical analysis of this if anyone is interested -- that way we can identify who here is an effortposter or shitposter!
by Italios » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:34 pm
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:And of course they pick usually on people weaker than them. Weaker countries. Weaker people. Women. Minorities. Etc. Because then they can REALLY live out the punishment, because you can't punish someone for being better than you and they don't want to punish themselves for being better. They find the mirror of their own perceived inadequacies. Lots of Nazis were homosexuals, in the Waffen-SS there were even lots of crossdressers. We might even connect a fascist obsession with cleanliness and order with a Freudian anality. They are anally retentive in terms of racial hygiene and anally expulsive in terms of their idea of public politics.
The rest of fascist politics are just things that will help them stay in power. There's not much true ideology there. They co-opt whatever they need to ensure they win and they can carry out their program.
I hate fascism. On so many levels. For so many different reasons. We should squash them wherever and whenever they appear, forcefully.
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:34 pm
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:35 pm
we can go to a cheap entry edm club at 2am, maybe you will change your mind
by Cekoviu » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:35 pm
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:Cekoviu wrote:out of curiosity, i searched through pages 418-428 (10 pages, so 200 posts) to find what one could consider good faith political effortposts. here are the ones i found (more could be included that i didn't; it's definitely a subjective judgment. inclusion does not necessarily mean that i agree with the contents of the post.):
they total at 29, or 14.5% of the total, which means my estimate was nearly spot-on.
willing to do more in-depth statistical analysis of this if anyone is interested -- that way we can identify who here is an effortposter or shitposter!
draw up a list of regulars, and order them by avg words per post
by Imperium Romanum Sanctis » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:36 pm
by Northern Davincia » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:36 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Valrifell » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:36 pm
Questarian New Yorkshire wrote:Cekoviu wrote:out of curiosity, i searched through pages 418-428 (10 pages, so 200 posts) to find what one could consider good faith political effortposts. here are the ones i found (more could be included that i didn't; it's definitely a subjective judgment. inclusion does not necessarily mean that i agree with the contents of the post.):
they total at 29, or 14.5% of the total, which means my estimate was nearly spot-on.
willing to do more in-depth statistical analysis of this if anyone is interested -- that way we can identify who here is an effortposter or shitposter!
draw up a list of regulars, and order them by avg words per post
by Sundiata » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:36 pm
by Valrifell » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:37 pm
Imperium Romanum Sanctis wrote:Valrifell wrote:
Unless you can point to a case where a VP with a failed electoral record (I.E. lose their most-recent contest), then I don't see how that could be the case.
Nixon.
Not exactly the same circumstances, but it's similar.
He was VP to Ike, lost the 1960 presidential election to JFK, came back eight years later and won by a landslide.
by United Muscovite Nations » Sun Jun 14, 2020 6:37 pm
Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Cerespasia, Cerula, Emotional Support Crocodile, Kostane, Three Galaxies, Yasuragi
