Liked and Retweeted by Theodore Vohoffsky and Erika Goldman
Advertisement
by The World Capitalist Confederation » Mon May 25, 2020 4:53 pm
by Agarntrop » Mon May 25, 2020 4:54 pm
Max Smith @GovernorSmith I will look into introducing similar legislation in Arizona to the Anti-Lynching Bill before Congress. Lynching is a great evil that must be punished. |
by Titanne » Mon May 25, 2020 4:55 pm
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:
Liked and retweeted by @NHSenatorMerriam.
Senator Augusta Merriam
@NHSenatorMerriam
Over a century and a half ago, the Republicans under Lincoln put an end to slavery. Today, I'm proud to work with Representative @JohnAtangNY3 to spearhead bipartisan action by both parties to finally put the evil of lynching to an end.
by New Cobastheia » Mon May 25, 2020 5:01 pm
by Sanabel » Mon May 25, 2020 5:29 pm
Meelducan wrote:Seminole Golf Club, Juno Beach Florida
"Mr. President," Micheal said, accepting his hand in an exciting way. "Great to see you. Amazing day for golf!"
He placed the ball down and swung, landing a bit behind the Presidents.
"How have you been keeping?"
by Bruke » Mon May 25, 2020 5:34 pm
by Sarenium » Mon May 25, 2020 6:21 pm
...I'd like to do you slowly...
Just another Australian.
by Sarenium » Mon May 25, 2020 6:23 pm
...I'd like to do you slowly...
Just another Australian.
by Rijkenlandd » Mon May 25, 2020 7:53 pm
by The World Capitalist Confederation » Mon May 25, 2020 7:57 pm
by Azekopolaltion » Mon May 25, 2020 7:58 pm
Sarenium wrote:The Office of Tim Westra
Arriving promptly, Jillian rocked up for what she expected would be a kind brunch, she'd come equipped with a pesky little bottle of wine as a gift and with a bright smile asked to be let in.
by Sarenium » Mon May 25, 2020 8:00 pm
Azekopolaltion wrote:Sarenium wrote:The Office of Tim Westra
Arriving promptly, Jillian rocked up for what she expected would be a kind brunch, she'd come equipped with a pesky little bottle of wine as a gift and with a bright smile asked to be let in.
Senator Westra walked out of his office to find Jillian Dayton waiting outside with his Secretary, having been invited by him this time. He greeted her with a wide smile. "Senator Dayton! Please, come in."
"We didn't get to catch up after the debate. Well done, by the way."
...I'd like to do you slowly...
Just another Australian.
by Velahor » Mon May 25, 2020 8:42 pm
The World Capitalist Confederation wrote:Gordano and Lysandus wrote:
"If there's anything you need to talk about, anything that's bothering you, just get in touch." She smiled, going to give the dogs some pets before she went to head off to other business. "Bye Felix!"FROM: [Representative Caroline Simone]
TO: [Representative Davit Papazian]
See me at once.
Caroline Simone
US Representative for the 12th District of the State of New York
Chair of the House Democratic CaucusFROM: [Representative Caroline Simone]
TO: [Representative Theodore Vohoffsky]
Dear Theodore,
I'd like to have some words with you about events that transpired during Rep. Papazian's debate viewing party in Los Angeles. Please swing by my office as soon as convenient.
Yours,
Caroline
Theo saw the letter, and had prepared defences for both his actions with Felix and his actions against the clown people.
"Good afternoon, Majority Caucus Leader Simone."
by Velahor » Mon May 25, 2020 8:51 pm
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:Velahor wrote:“First of all, Theo did mention that you two spoke about a potential move for libertarians to move to the Democrats. I wanted you to know that an arrangement of that sort is not off the table for me, pending the result of my current race as well. And if Secretary Porter gets the nomination, I will personally switch my party affiliation that day. Whether it’s to the Libertarians or the Democrats is yet to be decided, but I did want you to know that such a result in this election occurs, I will be looking for a place to go.”
Paulson drank more of her coffee.
"Well, as I mentioned before, you'll find a much more functional apparatus - which is more more protective for your seats - with the Democrats. But I appreciate your warmth and honesty on the matter. I approached Theo Vohoffsky because I was getting the impression that you and your corner really weren't happy with the Republican Party and your relationship to it."
by The Orion Islands » Mon May 25, 2020 8:54 pm
Sarenium wrote:Republican Policy Luncheon
Howard Frankston who had largely retained his silence through most of the conversation raised an eyebrow in Fitzdaniel's direction before speaking up, "the Senator intends to vote aye which combined with not-Toomey takes us to a tie, the caucus will take him to task in the interim between now and when your voters kick you on your ass. In the meantime, the next person to indicate their intention to vote aye can say so now and we'll direct 5 instead of 10 million to your best primary challengers campaign."
by Titanne » Mon May 25, 2020 8:58 pm
by Sarenium » Mon May 25, 2020 8:59 pm
The Orion Islands wrote:Sarenium wrote:Republican Policy Luncheon
Howard Frankston who had largely retained his silence through most of the conversation raised an eyebrow in Fitzdaniel's direction before speaking up, "the Senator intends to vote aye which combined with not-Toomey takes us to a tie, the caucus will take him to task in the interim between now and when your voters kick you on your ass. In the meantime, the next person to indicate their intention to vote aye can say so now and we'll direct 5 instead of 10 million to your best primary challengers campaign."
Senator Colbert: “So that forces Tawney to cast a tie breaking vote against. I need to call not-Gardner and make sure that he doesn’t go rouge. If we get 51 ayes, we need to get a plan. Filibuster, motions, delaying tactics. What?”
...I'd like to do you slowly...
Just another Australian.
by Puertollano » Mon May 25, 2020 9:20 pm
by Titanne » Mon May 25, 2020 9:21 pm
by Sarenium » Mon May 25, 2020 11:21 pm
...I'd like to do you slowly...
Just another Australian.
by Gordano and Lysandus » Tue May 26, 2020 4:15 am
Velahor wrote:“We will see what happens, is there anything else? Any other bipartisan legislation I could sponsor?”
by Gordano and Lysandus » Tue May 26, 2020 4:17 am
Velahor wrote:Davit saw the letter, and showed up at Caroline’s office.
“Good afternoon Congresswoman Simone, may I ask, why is it that you’re calling me in to this meeting?”
Davit had known about some trouble that had gone on at the party, but was not aware of the details, as he had stopped to tie his shoe and was well behind the rest on the trail.
by Gordano and Lysandus » Tue May 26, 2020 4:20 am
Sarenium wrote:"I'll reach out to Trahan for his vote, and we'll lean on the Alaskan and Alabamian Democrat, if 51 Aye votes come together," he glanced at the Maine and Coloradan Senators, "then yes, we will likely filibuster," he looked to Leader Warrick.
by Azekopolaltion » Tue May 26, 2020 6:16 am
Tim Westra 2020: Sharing the Benefits of TechnologyData is the oil of the 21st Century. Literally. Your data - every website you visit, every post you put up on social media, every online form you fill out - is the most valuable resource in the world right now.
The 21st Century has seen some of the most rapid technological developments in human history. Your data is now worth more than oil. Yet, only a handful of companies are reaping the majority of the increased benefits from technology. We need to take a modern approach so everyone shares in the successes of technology.
But do you get a cut every time a tech firm uses that data? Do you get a check in the mail, or some kind of compensation for it? Do you even know whether your data is being used?
The irresponsible use of data without consumer knowledge is just the tip of the iceberg. Giant digital firms like Google, Amazon, Apple, and Facebook are operating in an environment where there is little control over and little knowledge of their actions. These companies get to call the shots on sensitive issues like freedom of speech, private safety, and curbing the spread of misinformation.
Facebook's goal isn't a secure society, it's to cut a profit. And right now, the profit incentive is getting in the way of responsible self-regulation in the interest of societal wellbeing. Foreign actors are using tech platforms to interfere in our elections, political campaigns are able to rapidly spread "alternative facts" all over social media, political dissidents often have their voices suppressed, and our children are being exposed to predators and unsafe content online - all because of an unregulated business model that centers around addiction and engagement.
Worse still, our government is currently completely unequipped to deal with the pressing issues posed by technology. That much was evident with disastrous Congressional hearings on technology, featuring completely uninformed politicians asking questions that are not remotely relevant to some of the most powerful CEOs in the tech industry. It should be a concern that the Office of Technology Assessment was abolished in 1995 – not the 21st Century.
It's time for a competent, comprehensive government agenda to deal with the rising tide of technology that is outpacing societal benefit.
EMPOWERING TECHNOLOGY CONSUMERS AND REIGNING IN MONOPOLIES
The big tech companies oftentimes know more about you than some of your best friends or even loved ones. Your taste in music, your favorite TV shows, even your political views - it's likely that a company such as Google knows it all. That's a result of about 90% of all global online searches being performed on just one platform.
Tech companies are using their increasing economic power, their influence over your lives, and their lobbyist cash to crush competition and come out on top. But competition is essential to allow innovation to thrive, even in the tech industry. For example, the rise of companies like Google and Amazon was permitted because the government intervened to stop Microsoft from overtaking the new web browser sector. The reason those companies exist today is because of competitive markets that were created by government advocacy. The irony is that those very same companies are behaving like selfish monopolies today.
Your data belongs to you, not to Facebook or Amazon or any other tech firm. American consumers deserve to operate in a fair market where information flows freely. Senator Westra wants to:- Codify data as a property right. In the legal status quo, the data that you generate every day belongs to the company that collects it, not you. They can use that data however they wish without informing you - selling it, using it in targeted advertising, and utilizing it to make generalizations about their consumers and large populations. Extracting personal data is the fastest growing industry in America; companies are using your private information without consent. You should be informed by companies as to what data will be collected and how it will be used, and you should be able to opt out of this collection at any time. You should also be informed any time your private data is sold, and companies should delete all your data if you request it.
- Break up Big Tech. The vast majority of technology-related economic activity is benefiting a handful of corporations. Over 70% of all Internet traffic is being processed through sites operated/owned by Google or Facebook. The monopolization of the tech industry is allowing companies like Amazon, who operate proprietary marketplaces, to demote competition - like pushing them to the last page of a web search. A Westra administration will utilize the proper antitrust channels to break up companies like Google, Facebook, and Amazon that are using their economic power to limit competition and fair markets.
- Create a Department of Technology, which operates at the Cabinet level. Technology is too relevant of an issue to be ignored by the federal government. If we have any hope in implementing necessary regulations in the tech industry, it is by understanding it. That can only be done with a government department that assesses the impact of technology and areas where regulations are necessary, similar to the EPA.
CURBING DISINFORMATION ONLINE WHILE SECURING FREE SPEECH
Spreading untrue and misleading content online was a big part of foreign intervention in our elections in 2016 to influence how our population thinks and acts. Tech companies simply did not have the federal guidance and processes in place to deal with this foreign meddling.
The security of our democracy is more important than the tech profits and shareholder dividends that are financed by advertising false information and putting up sensational content that gets views.
People deserve to know whether the content that they are reading, watching, and listening to is true or not. Tim will work with federal regulators and tech companies to:- Increase algorithmic transparency. Right now, algorithms utilized by platforms like YouTube (owned by Google) and news aggregators often trap people in political bubbles. For those with a leaning towards untrue conspiracy theories instead of objective political content, foreign actors can use these algorithms to their advantage to flood an individual's feed with content of only one kind. Tech companies should have a legal responsibility to explain their content algorithm to every consumer, and allow people to opt out of this content amplification.
- Provide clear labeling for content produced by state-controlled actors. The media organization Russia Today consciously changed its name to RT, making it easy for some consumers of this media to be unaware that it is a state-funded organization. This isn't necessarily a bad thing - the BBC and Al Jazeera are also forms of state media - but consumers should have access to full information about the content they are viewing.
- Amend the Communications Decency Act of 1996 to ensure that operators of Internet services are treated as publishers. If Facebook chooses to put up false content, they should be held liable for any disinformation they spread just as any other publisher would be. This is a good way to disincentivize Internet publishers from spreading fake news.
- Require algorithms on online platforms that allow political advertising to be open source. This is another way to push companies like Facebook away from political advertising, since tech companies are often reluctant to make their code open source for other companies to see.
TECHNOLOGICAL EQUITY
In this day and age, high-speed and quality internet services are crucial for families, young people, and local businesses to operate freely and effectively. Yet lobbyists from big internet service providers and cable companies ensure that in many places, especially rural America, access to a variety of high-speed internet options is limited.
Access to internet should be considered a basic necessity like housing, healthcare, and food. The government should step in to ensure that any citizen who wishes to have access to Internet is able to, and also should abide by principles of a fair market on the Internet.
Tim will:- Establish a grant program to encourage states and municipalities to make broadband a public utility or provide a public Internet option. This would be competitive $150 billion program to provide affordable or free access to Internet to every American citizen if they want it.
- Increase the FCC definition of minimum broadband speeds and require all internet service providers to provide a basic Internet package that is affordable and high-speed. Big ISPs have enjoyed the privileges of government subsidies, little to no regulation, and light competition. It's time they pay our communities back.
- Instruct the FCC to reinstate net neutrality and codify it so that it cannot be rolled back again by the agency. The power to change website speeds and promote inequality over the Internet should not be vested in the hands of ISPs that are motivate by the money of other companies, not consumer preferences. Tim will fight to reinstate and protect net neutrality.
by Sarenium » Tue May 26, 2020 6:21 am
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:Sarenium wrote:"I'll reach out to Trahan for his vote, and we'll lean on the Alaskan and Alabamian Democrat, if 51 Aye votes come together," he glanced at the Maine and Coloradan Senators, "then yes, we will likely filibuster," he looked to Leader Warrick.
"I believe Senators (not-Collins) and (not-Gardner) know where they stand." Warrick had charged her with keeping them in line and this was a task to which she was inexhaustively committed. "At a risk of being cynical, why don't we try to get the matter dealt with before Senator Little's successor is seated?"
...I'd like to do you slowly...
Just another Australian.
Advertisement
Return to Portal to the Multiverse
Users browsing this forum: Arvenia, Bruhssians, Tracian Empire
Advertisement