[The Issue] Recently, a Mr. @@malerandomname@@ was put on trial for murder, and for a crime he most definitely did commit, saying that there were multiple eye witnesses who claimed to see him kill his innocent victim, and even a security camera tape of the incident. But, Mr. @@malerandomname@@ claims his innocence for one reason- he does not remember ever doing the crime.
[The Debate]
Option 1: "This is absurd!", cries the distraught family member of the victim, tissues in hand. "Just because he doesn't remember the crime doesn't mean he didnt commit it! You simply cant accept the plea of amnesia for any crime whatsoever!"
Option 2: The judge of this rather strange case asks for just a bit of your time, telling you, "Well, it would make sense for us to let this man go. After all, if he doesn't remember doing the crime, it isnt likely he will repeat his actions."
Option 3: "I'm not saying he isnt guilty.", your Misister of Second Chances starts out, "But maybe we just let him off with a little warning, and give him a second chance. I'm sure he'll be a good little member of society once this is all over."
[The Results]
Option 1: Sleepwalking kids "disturbing the peace" are given a steep fine.
Option 2: Criminals no longer plead insanity, they lead Amnesia.
Option 3: Triple murderers are let off with just a friendly warning.