Recognising this is an April Fools joke,
Realising it is no longer April Fools,
Hereby repeals "Condemn This Game".
Tell me if this is legal pls
by Gorundu » Sun Apr 05, 2020 8:57 am
Recognising this is an April Fools joke,
Realising it is no longer April Fools,
Hereby repeals "Condemn This Game".
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:15 am
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Lord Dominator » Sun Apr 05, 2020 9:24 am
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:I think the mention of April Fools would be a R4(a) violation - real world reference.
by Sedgistan » Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:26 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Mon Apr 06, 2020 3:48 am
Sedgistan wrote:I'd be inclined to consider April Fools acceptable within Rule 4; it's an aspect of the NationStates world. That's not to say that any mention of it, or details of NS's various April Fools events are necessarily Rule 4 compliant - but "April Fools" alone shouldn't be automatically a violation.
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement