NATION

PASSWORD

Replacing the UN with a new sans-China organization

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4241
Founded: Apr 05, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Replacing the UN with a new sans-China organization

Postby LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Sat Apr 04, 2020 12:34 pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmsqeFAlSGA

So there's increasing reason to suspect that China's involvement in the W.H.O. played a key role in why they were praising China's response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

ANY time is a terrible time to be beholden to a government known for shooting their own citizens for protesting or getting citizens who didn't even protest killed through industrial recklessness. But the world has paid for its complacency by the fact that now it's no longer just the Chinese under threat from their government, but all of us. Every one of us now has far more reason to stand up to the Chinese government; and less reason not to.

So why not abolish the UN; and in turn, its sub-branch of the W.H.O.; and replace them with a new organization beholden to everyone but the Chinese government, such that it could represent the world's interests more, and the Chinese government's interests less?

Image
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.

How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

User avatar
Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States
P2TM RP Mentor
 
Posts: 19225
Founded: Feb 20, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States » Sat Apr 04, 2020 12:54 pm

Because that would defeat the purpose of the United Nations.
The name's James. James Usari. Well, my name is not actually James Usari, so don't bother actually looking it up, but it'll do for now.

Lack of a real name means compensation through a real face. My debt is settled


Part-time Kebab tycoon in Glasgow.

User avatar
Tinhampton
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6889
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Anarchy

Postby Tinhampton » Sat Apr 04, 2020 12:58 pm

If that's what you're seeking, why can't/shouldn't the UN (etc.) just strip PR China of its membership and hand it to Taiwan instead - like it used to before Nixon's olive branch? Or is this a matter of waning Taiwanese recognition among world governments?
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 319,372): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP) ~ Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador
World Assembly Delegate of Auctor * 73rd Cup of Harmony winners * Queen Yuno did nothing wrong

Security Council:
A: SC#250 "Repeal "Liberate Femdom Empire"" (87%)
A: SC#251 "Commend Alasdair I Frosticus" (91%)
A: SC#267 "Repeal "Liberate The East Pacific"" (90%)

General Assembly:
A: GA#484 "Disease Naming Compact" (54%)
C: GA#491 "Rights of the employed" (54%)

Issues:
C: Issue #1115 "One in the Arm for @@LEADER@@?"
Quoth RiderSyl: "If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead."

User avatar
Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States
P2TM RP Mentor
 
Posts: 19225
Founded: Feb 20, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States » Sat Apr 04, 2020 1:01 pm

Tinhampton wrote:If that's what you're seeking, why can't/shouldn't the UN (etc.) just strip PR China of its membership and hand it to Taiwan instead - like it used to before Nixon's olive branch? Or is this a matter of waning Taiwanese recognition among world governments?

The Security Council would never agree to nominating Taiwan for membership.
The name's James. James Usari. Well, my name is not actually James Usari, so don't bother actually looking it up, but it'll do for now.

Lack of a real name means compensation through a real face. My debt is settled


Part-time Kebab tycoon in Glasgow.

User avatar
Kowani
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21906
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Sat Apr 04, 2020 1:03 pm

There should be a disclaimer on this thread: Proposal not based on reality.
Spanish Atheist.
If an area was ours for 500 years and yours for 50 years, it should belong to us – you are merely occupiers.
If an area was yours for 500 years and ours for 50 years, it should belong to us – borders must not be changed.
If an area belonged to us 500 years ago but never since then, it should belong to us – it is the cradle of our nation.
If a majority of our people live there, it must belong to us – they must enjoy the right of self-determination.
If a minority of our people live there, it must belong to us – they must be protected against your oppression.
All of the above rules apply to us, but not to you.
Our dream of greatness is historical necessity, yours is fascism.

User avatar
Lord Dominator
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5967
Founded: Dec 22, 2016
Corporate Police State

Postby Lord Dominator » Sat Apr 04, 2020 1:08 pm

Iran, Saudi Arabia, Russia, and South Africa are all founding members, and they weren't removed at any point since then.

North Korea is a current member.

What reason do we have that we need to remove just China?
Dee Vytherov-Skollvaldr | Forest | TBH Major and Council Member | WA Vizier | Ambassador to the WA

User avatar
Estanglia
Senator
 
Posts: 3566
Founded: Dec 31, 2017
Anarchy

Postby Estanglia » Sat Apr 04, 2020 1:13 pm

Why remove just China?

If we're gonna replace the UN with a sans-China organisation, take the opportunity and kick out other authoritarian states.
Yeah: Egalitarianism, equality
Meh: Labour, the EU
Nah: pointless discrimination, authoritarianism, Brexit, Trump, both American parties, the Conservatives
Flops between "optimistic about the future" and "pessimistic about the future" every time I go on NSG.

(Taken 2/5/20)
Political compass test:
Economic Left/Right: -6.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.92

8values thinks I'm a Libertarian Socialist.

Torrocca wrote:"Your honor, it was not mein fault! I didn't order the systematic genocide of millions of people, it was the twenty kilograms of pure-cut Bavarian cocaine that did it!"

User avatar
Tinhampton
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6889
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Anarchy

Postby Tinhampton » Sat Apr 04, 2020 1:20 pm

Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States wrote:
Tinhampton wrote:If that's what you're seeking, why can't/shouldn't the UN (etc.) just strip PR China of its membership and hand it to Taiwan instead - like it used to before Nixon's olive branch? Or is this a matter of waning Taiwanese recognition among world governments?

The Security Council would never agree to nominating Taiwan for membership.

As I understand, PR China was seated by a General Assembly resolution, not a Security Council one. Why would it be different now?
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 319,372): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP) ~ Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador
World Assembly Delegate of Auctor * 73rd Cup of Harmony winners * Queen Yuno did nothing wrong

Security Council:
A: SC#250 "Repeal "Liberate Femdom Empire"" (87%)
A: SC#251 "Commend Alasdair I Frosticus" (91%)
A: SC#267 "Repeal "Liberate The East Pacific"" (90%)

General Assembly:
A: GA#484 "Disease Naming Compact" (54%)
C: GA#491 "Rights of the employed" (54%)

Issues:
C: Issue #1115 "One in the Arm for @@LEADER@@?"
Quoth RiderSyl: "If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead."

User avatar
Heloin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13018
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Heloin » Sat Apr 04, 2020 1:27 pm

The Organisation who's original point is just avoiding World War Three by making people talk more, you want to remove a nuclear superpower with a massive standing army from that?
I hope you meet the rabbit with the feather in her hat, the penny whistle girl with the orange colored cap.
Bells on her coat and a raggle taggle kind of grin, she'll teach you how to love if you believe in her


Free All Of Africa From Hate
Proudly Zimbabwean | Stand With Hong Kong | One Big Union

User avatar
Diahon
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1470
Founded: Apr 01, 2020
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Diahon » Sat Apr 04, 2020 1:27 pm

No, that is not how you go about this. With China being an active hotspot for zoonotic pathogens, its cooperation is essential if future epidemics are to be curtailed before they become full-blown pandemics.

Global cooperation means global cooperation, not vital countries going rogue or being excluded. Even if you think lowly of the current leadership, you cannot think lowly of the people it ostensibly serves, and which would suffer under any arrangement that effectively ostracizes China.
FLEE.

User avatar
Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States
P2TM RP Mentor
 
Posts: 19225
Founded: Feb 20, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States » Sat Apr 04, 2020 1:28 pm

Tinhampton wrote:
Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States wrote:The Security Council would never agree to nominating Taiwan for membership.

As I understand, PR China was seated by a General Assembly resolution, not a Security Council one. Why would it be different now?

Yes. Normally, membership of a new nation is granted by a nomination of the Security Council, voted on by the General Assembly. However, in the case of China, no new member was admitted. The People's Republic was chosen to be the new representative of the State of China. So, China remained a member, just represented by a different entity.

Now, it was supported because the majority of the General Assembly saw the logic behind recognising the PRC, it being a nuclear power in control of the Chinese mainland. However, the reverse would be inconceivable.
The name's James. James Usari. Well, my name is not actually James Usari, so don't bother actually looking it up, but it'll do for now.

Lack of a real name means compensation through a real face. My debt is settled


Part-time Kebab tycoon in Glasgow.

User avatar
LRON
Diplomat
 
Posts: 648
Founded: Jan 20, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby LRON » Sat Apr 04, 2020 1:50 pm

What an utterly silly and ridiculous proposal.
Ravenous, ridiculous, and rakish!
Political fixer turned novelist.
Upper Class Anglo-Indian.
Proud Tory, but no longer a member of the Conservative Party.
Enthusiastically eccentric.

User avatar
Diahon
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1470
Founded: Apr 01, 2020
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Diahon » Sat Apr 04, 2020 1:56 pm

LRON wrote:What an utterly silly and ridiculous proposal.


Not more ridiculous than the world we actually live in.
FLEE.

User avatar
Couray
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Mar 01, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Couray » Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:10 pm

I'm all for the general "screw the PRC" sentiment here, but the UN's whole purpose is to bring together those of opposing viewpoints, to you know, avoid misunderstandings and wars.
Tinhampton wrote:
Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States wrote:The Security Council would never agree to nominating Taiwan for membership.

As I understand, PR China was seated by a General Assembly resolution, not a Security Council one. Why would it be different now?

As unfortunate as it is, China has a good deal of the world in an economic choke-hold. If the PRC were to go into a recession or otherwise became economically irrelevant (which they won't anytime soon imo), then replacing them with the Republic of China could be possible. That is, if they don't have a strong African bloc supporting them by then.
                        
| The Principality of Couray, the Blessed Land
| ₤1.00CFC = $1.29USD | Led by HRH Shahad II
| Wiki | Glossary | About Me
National tldr: A Mormon and Muslim parliamentary monarchy that heavily influences Indian Ocean and West Pacific politics
| SASANU MEDIA GROUP | Petrol station robberies at an all time low as use of digital currency is enforced at the pump | HRH Shahad II enforces transition to new currency through royal decree at the dismay of the legislative houses |
❤ I don't use NS Stats ❤ Read my factbooks, I write them w love ❤ My canon isn't set in stone ❤ Proud Supporter of WA Sec.-Gen Kuriko ❤

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25668
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:24 pm

Diahon wrote:
LRON wrote:What an utterly silly and ridiculous proposal.


Not more ridiculous than the world we actually live in.

No, it is. "the forum we created to discuss diplomatic issues in the hopes of resolving them without military conflict should kick out the world's second most powerful country and its largest economy" is a farce.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25668
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:25 pm

Couray wrote:I'm all for the general "screw the PRC" sentiment here, but the UN's whole purpose is to bring together those of opposing viewpoints, to you know, avoid misunderstandings and wars.
Tinhampton wrote:As I understand, PR China was seated by a General Assembly resolution, not a Security Council one. Why would it be different now?

As unfortunate as it is, China has a good deal of the world in an economic choke-hold. If the PRC were to go into a recession or otherwise became economically irrelevant (which they won't anytime soon imo), then replacing them with the Republic of China could be possible. That is, if they don't have a strong African bloc supporting them by then.

No it wouldn't lol. They gave the PRC the ROC's membership when the PRC was an irrelevant backwater.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Heloin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13018
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Heloin » Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:28 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Couray wrote:I'm all for the general "screw the PRC" sentiment here, but the UN's whole purpose is to bring together those of opposing viewpoints, to you know, avoid misunderstandings and wars.
As unfortunate as it is, China has a good deal of the world in an economic choke-hold. If the PRC were to go into a recession or otherwise became economically irrelevant (which they won't anytime soon imo), then replacing them with the Republic of China could be possible. That is, if they don't have a strong African bloc supporting them by then.

No it wouldn't lol. They gave the PRC the ROC's membership when the PRC was an irrelevant backwater.

The PRC was an irrelevant backwater, in 1971?
I hope you meet the rabbit with the feather in her hat, the penny whistle girl with the orange colored cap.
Bells on her coat and a raggle taggle kind of grin, she'll teach you how to love if you believe in her


Free All Of Africa From Hate
Proudly Zimbabwean | Stand With Hong Kong | One Big Union

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25668
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:29 pm

Heloin wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:No it wouldn't lol. They gave the PRC the ROC's membership when the PRC was an irrelevant backwater.

The PRC was an irrelevant backwater, in 1971?

Yes. It was poorer than Zaire.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Couray
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Mar 01, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby Couray » Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:35 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Couray wrote:-snip-

No it wouldn't lol. They gave the PRC the ROC's membership when the PRC was an irrelevant backwater.

The ROC of the time would have been much more of an irrelevant backwater, one that was less economically advantageous to support, too. To say that China was completely irrelevant would be ignoring centuries of western powers trying to break their way into Chinese markets.
                        
| The Principality of Couray, the Blessed Land
| ₤1.00CFC = $1.29USD | Led by HRH Shahad II
| Wiki | Glossary | About Me
National tldr: A Mormon and Muslim parliamentary monarchy that heavily influences Indian Ocean and West Pacific politics
| SASANU MEDIA GROUP | Petrol station robberies at an all time low as use of digital currency is enforced at the pump | HRH Shahad II enforces transition to new currency through royal decree at the dismay of the legislative houses |
❤ I don't use NS Stats ❤ Read my factbooks, I write them w love ❤ My canon isn't set in stone ❤ Proud Supporter of WA Sec.-Gen Kuriko ❤

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25668
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:38 pm

Couray wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:No it wouldn't lol. They gave the PRC the ROC's membership when the PRC was an irrelevant backwater.

The ROC of the time would have been much more of an irrelevant backwater, one that was less economically advantageous to support, too. To say that China was completely irrelevant would be ignoring centuries of western powers trying to break their way into Chinese markets.

Trade with China was negligible at the time due to China's Maoist Third Worldist economy and ideology.

The ROC was replaced with the PRC because of a global reality check, not because of politicking.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States
P2TM RP Mentor
 
Posts: 19225
Founded: Feb 20, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States » Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:40 pm

Heloin wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:No it wouldn't lol. They gave the PRC the ROC's membership when the PRC was an irrelevant backwater.

The PRC was an irrelevant backwater, in 1971?

Economically, yes. China really only picked up economical speed in the 90s, which is why you can see all those pictures of large Chinese cities in 1990 and 2010 and see the incredible difference 20 years has made. It was only in the 90s that China tried to participate in international trade, and it boomed.

However, politically, of course, it has always had a very large army capable of exerting force throughout Asia, and in the 70s it had nukes. The combination of the large army and the nukes, as well as its falling out with the USSR, made it an important puzzle piece in the Cold War. Hence, it was given the task to represent China.

The reason the Korean War resolution passed through the Security Council was simply because the USSR was testing its theory that the veto could be cast by abstaining (it could not) and China was represented by US puppet Taiwan.
The name's James. James Usari. Well, my name is not actually James Usari, so don't bother actually looking it up, but it'll do for now.

Lack of a real name means compensation through a real face. My debt is settled


Part-time Kebab tycoon in Glasgow.

User avatar
Heloin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13018
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Heloin » Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:40 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Heloin wrote:The PRC was an irrelevant backwater, in 1971?

Yes. It was poorer than Zaire.

And a nuclear nation with one of the largest standing armies on earth. That's really irrelevant ain't it.
I hope you meet the rabbit with the feather in her hat, the penny whistle girl with the orange colored cap.
Bells on her coat and a raggle taggle kind of grin, she'll teach you how to love if you believe in her


Free All Of Africa From Hate
Proudly Zimbabwean | Stand With Hong Kong | One Big Union

User avatar
Heloin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13018
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Heloin » Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:41 pm

Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States wrote:
Heloin wrote:The PRC was an irrelevant backwater, in 1971?

Economically, yes. China really only picked up economical speed in the 90s, which is why you can see all those pictures of large Chinese cities in 1990 and 2010 and see the incredible difference 20 years has made. It was only in the 90s that China tried to participate in international trade, and it boomed.

However, politically, of course, it has always had a very large army capable of exerting force throughout Asia, and in the 70s it had nukes. The combination of the large army and the nukes, as well as its falling out with the USSR, made it an important puzzle piece in the Cold War. Hence, it was given the task to represent China.

The reason the Korean War resolution passed through the Security Council was simply because the USSR was testing its theory that the veto could be cast by abstaining (it could not) and China was represented by US puppet Taiwan.

Which was more my point.
I hope you meet the rabbit with the feather in her hat, the penny whistle girl with the orange colored cap.
Bells on her coat and a raggle taggle kind of grin, she'll teach you how to love if you believe in her


Free All Of Africa From Hate
Proudly Zimbabwean | Stand With Hong Kong | One Big Union

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25668
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:42 pm

Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States wrote:
Heloin wrote:The PRC was an irrelevant backwater, in 1971?

Economically, yes. China really only picked up economical speed in the 90s, which is why you can see all those pictures of large Chinese cities in 1990 and 2010 and see the incredible difference 20 years has made. It was only in the 90s that China tried to participate in international trade, and it boomed.

However, politically, of course, it has always had a very large army capable of exerting force throughout Asia, and in the 70s it had nukes. The combination of the large army and the nukes, as well as its falling out with the USSR, made it an important puzzle piece in the Cold War. Hence, it was given the task to represent China.

The reason the Korean War resolution passed through the Security Council was simply because the USSR was testing its theory that the veto could be cast by abstaining (it could not) and China was represented by US puppet Taiwan.

Their army couldn't even project force into Vietnam successfully and they lacked the ability to deliver their nuclear weapons.

You're being anachronistic, the US only adopted the Sino-Soviet split into its diplomacy after the resolution passed.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58841
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Sat Apr 04, 2020 2:42 pm

Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States wrote:Because that would defeat the purpose of the United Nations.

The UN already defeats the purpose of the UN
Male, Titoist cultural nationalist, lives somewhere in the Deep South, give me any good Irish, Canadian, or Scottish whiskey and I will be your friend for life. I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies
Click Here for RP Info Embassy Program
Ambassadors to the WA:
Ambassador to the GA Jon Æthr
Ambassador to the SC Eve Šanœ

RIP Dya

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ammostan, Bienenhalde, Birchard-Gamaliel, Bombadil, Cannot think of a name, Galloism, Gormwood, Greater Miami Shores, Major-Tom, Neanderthaland, New Visayan Islands, Proctopeo, Salus Maior, Shrillland, Soiled fruit roll ups, The Black Forrest, The Chuck

Advertisement

Remove ads