practically perfect royal toddlers tend to say "regrettably not at this juncture" rather than "no"
Advertisement
by TalAkMaChen » Wed Feb 19, 2020 4:52 pm
by TalAkMaChen » Sat Feb 22, 2020 5:53 pm
TalAkMaChen wrote:About #1318: Those options are not 1-4 but 1, 2, 3/4/5, and 7 -- so there is (at least) one more.
To explain:
Option 3 = Option 4 = Option 5
by TalAkMaChen » Mon Feb 24, 2020 8:25 am
by Typica » Mon Feb 24, 2020 10:35 pm
by Trotterdam » Tue Feb 25, 2020 10:18 am
Unfortunately, this is not data I have been tracking.Typica wrote:Hi trotterdam,
Much enjoying the data you're sharing, though I hope I may ask a small addition.
Could you, in addition to the mean value, also provide the standard deviation?
Please please please?
by TalAkMaChen » Thu Feb 27, 2020 6:35 am
by TalAkMaChen » Sun Mar 01, 2020 11:10 am
by Trotterdam » Mon Mar 02, 2020 3:53 pm
by TalAkMaChen » Thu Mar 05, 2020 4:44 am
by TalAkMaChen » Fri Mar 06, 2020 11:49 am
by TalAkMaChen » Sun Mar 08, 2020 4:45 am
by TalAkMaChen » Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:11 am
by Trotterdam » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:17 am
...Which you posted back last year? Maybe you should poke Jutsa.TalAkMaChen wrote:This statement can also be removed/marked by strike, since #1015 was changed from WA to @@REGION@@ Criminal Court, and thus open to all nations. Or are there more such? I didn't notice so far, but my check of issue texts is "only" complete to 93.6%.
Theoretically, it depends on the server load. If a lot of people are answering issues at once, my program can get distracted checking on all of them, and take a while to get back to yours. However in practice, that's pretty rare, and a mere 1 minute should be enough most of the time, though I prefer to wait somewhat longer "just to be safe". 10 minutes should be more than enough time even during a worst-case scenario (barring major server lag/downtime, in which case you just won't be answering a lot of issues anyway).TalAkMaChen wrote:Also, what's a good delay between answering issues when your collector shall be able to "digest" the changes properly? A few minutes, 5, 10, more?
by TalAkMaChen » Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:51 am
by Trotterdam » Thu Mar 19, 2020 3:14 pm
by TalAkMaChen » Fri Mar 20, 2020 1:34 pm
Trotterdam wrote:The other option that might qualify is #1168 3. However, I've somehow acquired exactly one data point on that (which shouldn't be possible if it's really WA-exclusive, as I've assumed it probably is, unless there's a glitch), so I'm not sure what's up. At the same time, the rest of the issue also has unusually few data points (which also suggests a narrow validity, possibly was-in-the-WA-and-left or possibly something else), but not quite as few as that one option. So it could be anything at this point.
by TalAkMaChen » Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:27 pm
by TalAkMaChen » Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:44 am
by TalAkMaChen » Tue Mar 31, 2020 5:36 am
by TalAkMaChen » Wed Apr 01, 2020 5:26 pm
by TalAkMaChen » Wed Apr 08, 2020 2:22 pm
by TalAkMaChen » Sun Apr 12, 2020 5:13 am
by TalAkMaChen » Tue Apr 14, 2020 3:04 pm
by TalAkMaChen » Wed Apr 29, 2020 1:40 pm
by TalAkMaChen » Sat May 09, 2020 11:40 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement