Glorious.
Advertisement
by Superbunny » Wed Mar 04, 2020 8:30 pm
by Jiggleyland » Thu Mar 05, 2020 12:32 am
by Bears Armed » Thu Mar 05, 2020 8:06 am
Superbunny wrote:No, it's because this pretty blatant joke proposal:
1) Got through GenSec (granted, it is technically legal.
by Superbunny » Thu Mar 05, 2020 10:19 am
by ArenaC » Thu Mar 05, 2020 7:09 pm
by The Palentine » Thu Mar 05, 2020 11:43 pm
ArenaC wrote:I’ve run out of things to say except:
- this is madness
by Draganisia » Fri Mar 06, 2020 1:01 am
by The Gilded Star » Fri Mar 06, 2020 1:51 am
Draganisia wrote:Speaking of Liberations.
St Abbaddon still has a Liberation that we have debated whether or not to repeal.
Problem is I have no idea how to write it up even if we do want to go through repealing it.
by Unibot III » Fri Mar 06, 2020 6:48 am
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Lothric- » Fri Mar 06, 2020 11:06 am
by Kuriko » Fri Mar 06, 2020 1:23 pm
Lothric- wrote:The Security Council won't vote yes for this, when it's a large region and deserving of it, but they'll go ahead and raid small regions with only 16 nations who've done nothing but mind their own business.
LOL goes to show how shitty this institution is, but everyone should vote yes, and maybe it'll pass despite the retards who serve the Security Council.
by Lothric- » Fri Mar 06, 2020 3:37 pm
Kuriko wrote:Lothric- wrote:The Security Council won't vote yes for this, when it's a large region and deserving of it, but they'll go ahead and raid small regions with only 16 nations who've done nothing but mind their own business.
LOL goes to show how shitty this institution is, but everyone should vote yes, and maybe it'll pass despite the retards who serve the Security Council.
If you knew anything about the SC and it's mechanisms you would know that Liberations do not affect Game Created Regions like The East Pacific.
by Yokiria » Fri Mar 06, 2020 4:04 pm
Lothric- wrote:If that was the case the proposal would've been stopped by the Security Council overseer dudes for being illegal
Lothric- wrote:...Looks like you're wrong?
No surprise there though, go off with your incorrect nonsense buddy
by Tarnik » Fri Mar 06, 2020 4:37 pm
Lothric- wrote:The Security Council won't vote yes for this, when it's a large region and deserving of it, but they'll go ahead and raid small regions with only 16 nations who've done nothing but mind their own business.
LOL goes to show how shitty this institution is, but everyone should vote yes, and maybe it'll pass despite the retards who serve the Security Council.
by WayNeacTia » Fri Mar 06, 2020 5:59 pm
Lothric- wrote:If that was the case the proposal would've been stopped by the Security Council overseer dudes for being illegal, but since it's at vote...Looks like you're wrong?
No surprise there though, go off with your incorrect nonsense buddy
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Snowbirds-Aurora » Fri Mar 06, 2020 7:19 pm
Lothric- wrote:Kuriko wrote:If you knew anything about the SC and it's mechanisms you would know that Liberations do not affect Game Created Regions like The East Pacific.
If that was the case the proposal would've been stopped by the Security Council overseer dudes for being illegal, but since it's at vote...Looks like you're wrong?
No surprise there though, go off with your incorrect nonsense buddy
by Farnhamia » Fri Mar 06, 2020 10:13 pm
Lothric- wrote:The Security Council won't vote yes for this, when it's a large region and deserving of it, but they'll go ahead and raid small regions with only 16 nations who've done nothing but mind their own business.
LOL goes to show how shitty this institution is, but everyone should vote yes, and maybe it'll pass despite the retards who serve the Security Council.
Snowbirds-Aurora wrote:Lothric- wrote:If that was the case the proposal would've been stopped by the Security Council overseer dudes for being illegal, but since it's at vote...Looks like you're wrong?
No surprise there though, go off with your incorrect nonsense buddy
how about not using slurs lothric, you fucking clown ass
by Confederation State Broadcasting » Sat Mar 07, 2020 3:48 am
by The New California Republic » Sat Mar 07, 2020 3:49 am
Confederation State Broadcasting wrote:We are disappointed to note The East Pacific's blatant manipulation of trademarked Confederation tactics, and thus cannot support the resolution at vote. This sort of behaviour must be put to an end!!
by WayNeacTia » Sat Mar 07, 2020 6:22 am
Confederation State Broadcasting wrote:We are disappointed to note The East Pacific's blatant manipulation of trademarked Confederation tactics, and thus cannot support the resolution at vote. This sort of behaviour must be put to an end!!
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by The Notorious Mad Jack » Sat Mar 07, 2020 7:18 am
Wayneactia wrote:Here's the thing though, Marrabuk won't be laughed at for itConfederation State Broadcasting wrote:We are disappointed to note The East Pacific's blatant manipulation of trademarked Confederation tactics, and thus cannot support the resolution at vote. This sort of behaviour must be put to an end!!
by The New California Republic » Sat Mar 07, 2020 10:12 am
Bormiar wrote:Seconds ago: The Security Council resolution "Liberate The East Pacific" was defeated 8,800 votes to 6,708.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement