[R]Renewed long-term trolling

[Salandriagado]

Don't jump into discussions that you don't understand. You'll just embarrass yourself.

That is excellent advice. Would that you might follow your own advice when pontificating on matters outside mathematics!

A positive return. That is: every pound spent on welfare makes the government more than a pound in resulting increased taxes (broadly, because benefit recipients spend it on necessaries, boosting the economy). Unlike, say, literally anything that effectively gives money to the rich.

That's simply not true. I could accuse you of lying as you so wantonly throw around at others but it is in reality a very large lack of understanding on how spending works. You afterall under the impression we are renters with no right to object and that one can borrow without consequence. Even assuming we accept your "genius" policy proposal, your .gov won't get back the money. It's a paper gain. Those necessaries aren't even made in Britain anymore.

Continuing previous report here. This is now a years long campaign of targetted harrassment and trolling.

[Greater Miami Shores]

To the Moderator: Since I am the subject of Salandriagado's comment, I can safely post on this thread without it being considered spamming moderation. This Post will be edited, I am working on it.

It all begins here:
viewtopic.php?p=36468430#p36468430
This Post to be edited I am still working on it.
Posted by Salandriagado to me:
Don't you into conversations you don't understand,
viewtopic.php?p=36469125#p36469125

[Frisbeeteria]

Since I am the subject of Salandriagado's comment, I can safely post on this thread without it being considered spamming moderation

Your post has nothing to do with the complaint. Please stay out of this thread.

[Greater Miami Shores]

Since I am the subject of Salandriagado's comment, I can safely post on this thread without it being considered spamming moderation

Your post has nothing to do with the complaint. Please stay out of this thread.

Ok Frisbeeteria I understand and will do as you say, I have moved on, thank you.

[The East Marches II]

It is hardly fair to call a series of disputes on political topics a targeted campaign. We had plenty of back and forths on a great many topics. Not to mention, a bit of mild snark as a riposte to his own insulting words towards Miami Shores is hardly actionable. If the good gentleman is so aggrieved, might I recommend he foes list me?

[Gormwood]

He does that shit with anyone he sees as left-leaning, trying to get them to bite the bait and do something he can report.

Pointing out how Trump defers to authoritarian strongmen apparently means you have an erotic fixation on him.

Come now Gauthier, you are quite notorious for your references to bodily functions. I think Nak's snark was spot on.

Here's a gratuitous cheap shot in a conversation I wasn't even a part of:

The ICC should issue arrest warrants for them. If they ever land in an ICC member state, they should be arrested and brought to trial.

The celebration of war crimes by Trump is one of the single most disgusting things he is responsible for. But hey, he is guilty of war crimes and arguably crimes against humanity himself. Birds of a feather and all.

And how many divisions does the ICC have? Frankly we should thank that liberal champion Mr. Obama for keeping the invade the hague act around. Yet another genius policy move from the chosen one which didn't have ill effects :^)

4D chess Gauthier tells me

[The East Marches II]

He does that shit with anyone he sees as left-leaning, trying to get them to bite the bait and do something he can report.

Come now Gauthier, you are quite notorious for your references to bodily functions. I think Nak's snark was spot on.

Here's a gratuitous cheap shot in a conversation I wasn't even a part of:

And how many divisions does the ICC have? Frankly we should thank that liberal champion Mr. Obama for keeping the invade the hague act around. Yet another genius policy move from the chosen one which didn't have ill effects :^)

4D chess Gauthier tells me

I've not reported a single person Gauthier. I'm horrified you say that of me. My record on that front is quite clean.

I was referencing your defense of Obama's expansion of executive powers at every opportunity. You told us Trump was too dumb to do any damage. It finally came back round to bite us in the ass. Perhaps I should have quoted your old post directly? It may be wise and I would be willing to count every time we clashed on that issue if moderation asks.

Your comments using bodily functions are quite notorious. You even get jumped by the whole thread sometimes with how gross they are. Nakena's comment was correct. The good lady said nothing incorrect.

[Salandriagado]

It is hardly fair to call a series of disputes on political topics a targeted campaign. We had plenty of back and forths on a great many topics.

No, it's a series of deliberate targetted insults with nothing to do with the topic.

Not to mention, a bit of mild snark as a riposte to his own insulting words towards Miami Shores is hardly actionable. If the good gentleman is so aggrieved, might I recommend he foes list me?

I didn't say anything insulting. I just pointed out that he had misread my post. Not that such has any relevance whatsoever to this report.

[Gormwood]

Still trying to bait.

So the thread is now gun nuts doing a victory dance over a knife attack. Wonderful.

This woe is me routine really unbecoming of you Gauthier.

[The East Marches II]

Still trying to bait.

This woe is me routine really unbecoming of you Gauthier.

You were ignoring the other discussions going to be the thread's martyr. It's hardly trolling to point out such behavior is beneath a poster whom I consider a personal friend.

[Salandriagado]

Erm, yes? We can argue as to whether it should be, but the fact of the matter is that it is, everywhere.

It isn't normal everywhere. Just in dystopian places without rights :^)

Pro-tip: this includes the States

Alas we poor renters have no right to complain!

[Gormwood]

He continues with a pattern of harassment at opportunity. Notice the smug Dorito Face added for emphasis.

You immediately assumed the reparations will be just handing out cash when it's been reported that they're focusing on vocational training and home purchase assistance.

I'll note you didn't disagree with the rest of his post :^)

[The East Marches II]

He continues with a pattern of harassment at opportunity. Notice the smug Dorito Face added for emphasis.

I'll note you didn't disagree with the rest of his post :^)

I was pointing something you left out in your comment. It's absence was deafening. If you are so bothered by somebody countering one of your posts, might I suggest the foes list? Apparently you are quite aggrieved by virtually any interaction.

Edit: I don't know why you're so offended by the friendly face. You are yourself a great fan of it. Afterall, :^] is your version of it.

[Audioslavia]

If acting like a smug passive-aggressive bumarse was actionable, we'd have to close down the 90% of the General forum.

Both of you need to use the 'foe' button and stop trying to score points in whatever stupid game you're playing.

[Gormwood]

If acting like a smug passive-aggressive bumarse was actionable, we'd have to close down the 90% of the General forum.

Both of you need to use the 'foe' button and stop trying to score points in whatever stupid game you're playing.

I'm contributing to Salandriago's report to help establish it's a long-standing habit and pattern with The Eastern Marches and that I'm not the only one he has behaved so passive-aggressively towards.

Even if I were to put him on the Foe list it is certain he will not put me on his, because it is his M.O. to passive-aggressively snark on left-leaning posters in hopes one will eventually react in a way he can report while skirting the rules to maintain plausible deniability.

[Audioslavia]

Even if I were to put him on the Foe list it is certain he will not put me on his, because it is his M.O. to passive-aggressively snark on left-leaning posters in hopes one will eventually react in a way he can report while skirting the rules to maintain plausible deniability.

And so let's see if he gets away with that.

[Salandriagado]

If acting like a smug passive-aggressive bumarse was actionable, we'd have to close down the 90% of the General forum.

Both of you need to use the 'foe' button and stop trying to score points in whatever stupid game you're playing.

Any ruling on the actual report in the OP, rather than the random tangent that followed?

[Gormwood]

Adding the latest to the laundry list of TEM's baitfest.

It's ok, I don't even think fine posters like Vassenor or Gauthier would oppose a story directly quoting the transcript. They aren't that far gone. I have faith in them :^)

Baitposting.

[Gormwood]

He just keeps going like the Energizer Bunny.

You keep shrieking about a boycott call like it'll singlehandedly destroy Israel and gas every Jew on the planet in a single stroke. The peanut butter quip is just pointing out the absurdity of treating boycotts as racial attacks. That so SJW.

I'm really glad the Women's March debacle happened. There Gauthier, your poor defense of this sort of nonsense collapsed as it was brought to public the sorts who are behind this business. Anti-semetic types galore. But it's perfect fine as long as you support social justice right Gauth :^)

Two opinion pieces. Welp I'm convinced.

That's more than your usual standard of evidence, I'm glad you saw the light :^)

Trump is more liberal on the Jews than most progressives. Truly a champion of civil rights in this instance.

He really is. That's why Vassenor and Gauthier's compliants are so shocking. I thought they were against discrimination :^)

So you're admitting that protesting Israel's treatment of Palestinians is in fact not detrimental to Jewish Self Determination?

Are you going to bother engaging with what they said, it is really reflecting poorly on your position :^)

So who writes Executive Orders then?

Those aren't laws Vassenor, no matter how much the executive would want them to be :^)

Notice the Dorito Face spam being used as passive-aggressive bait.

[The East Marches II]

Just because you and I have a friendly debate doesn't mean it is trolling. You were commenting on a thread and I merely did some clever ripostes. If you dislike my posting style, foes list it. Nobody is forcing you to read it.

[Gormwood]

Jokes are supposed to make well-adjusted people laugh.

No wonder you didn't find it funny :^)

[Katganistan]

I didn't find it funny, either.

[Gormwood]

I didn't find it funny, either.

Thank you.

[Gormwood]

Stating intention to further harass in the future. Again using Dorito Face to bait.

You're flailing too hard. You do you.

I'm hardly flailing. I'm scoring excellent points against your position. Your lack of a reply exposes the total bankruptcy of your position. You are right that your best bet in this argument is to run. Afterall, your position has been so thoroughly demolished you've nothing to stand on anymore :^)

I should note Gauth, I'll remember your victim blaming in the future. I can't wait for further discussions :^)

[The East Marches II]

Ah yes, using evidence of somebody victim blaming poor people of color is now harassment. As for the other bit, Mr. Gauthier and I had a debate. He was unable to win. If moderation wishes, they can inspect the whole thing. I was nothing if not cordial and comported myself well.