DRAFT 2:
TITLE:
The Wurst Meat
VALIDITY:
Low food standards, capitalist, not vegetarian.
DESCRIPTION:
Food scientists recently examined the market-leading brands of meat sausages, and discovered that many had barely any meat in them at all, with most being bulked out with cheaper rusk, bulking agents or -- in one case -- fine sawdust.
OPTION 1
"How can these sausages call themselves meat when they're mostly plant fibres?" asks chicken chipolata aficionado @@randomname@@, waving a manky-looking kielbasa at you. "The industry should be forced to clearly display the percentage of meat on the packaging, and shouldn't be allowed to call itself a meat product unless they are at least 50% meat. We, the people, hunger for better food standards!"
OUTCOME:
according the the government a BLT sandwich is suitable for vegetarians
OPTION 2
"Animal protein is expensive," complains small town butcher @@randomname@@, wringing his blood-stained hands. "With sausages, it's hard to make both ends meat. Look, people buy and enjoy them, no matter what they're made of. Can't you just leave it to the free market and wind back on all this food-labelling nonsense?"
OUTCOME:
sausages often have a woody flavour
OPTION 3
"Bad sausage! BAD SAUSAGE!" yells vegetarian activist @@randomfemalename@@ taking a claw hammer to a raw saveloy with sufficient fervour to make all the men in the room wince. "The correct amount of meat in a sausage is ZERO percent. Sausages, and indeed meats in general, represent an ecological and cardiovascular time bomb. Take the nation into mandatory vegetarianism, and end this meaty madness!"
OUTCOME:
salt-soaked vitamin-deficient mycoprotein is believed to be the "healthy" dietary option
DRAFT 1: