Sciongrad wrote:Wallenburg wrote:Does the challenged resolution argue it can? No. Very cool. Resolution is legal.
I'm sorry, you must be using the Wallenberger definition of parameter. I'm using the English one ("a limit or boundary that defines the scope of a particular process or activity"). If the question is whether there are parameters limiting the agency's rule-making discretion, the answer is categorically yes. If there are parameters on the subject-matter which the agency is able to regulate, then the claim that the target resolution "freely allows the World Assembly Compliance Commission (WACC) to create further regulations on behalf of the World Assembly" is false.
It is only false if you force an interpretation in which "create further regulations" means "create further regulations OF ANY NATURE OR DEGREE, REGARDLESS OF RELEVANCE TO THIS RESOLUTION", and decide that any different interpretation is unreasonable.