MAGAThread XVII: All Things NOT Impeachment

[Nakena]

Perhaps you could just agree to disagree?

Thank you my Friend lol. I know I can always count on you to defend me.

I might consider your renaming suggestion for the threads. Or should it be something like At the Shores of Miami?

[Gravlen]

Hey, remember when the Republican party was the party holding veterans high and...

Among Mr. Trump’s admissions in court papers: The charity gave his campaign complete control over disbursing the $2.8 million that the foundation had raised at a fund-raiser for veterans in Iowa in January 2016, only days before the state’s presidential nominating caucuses. The fund-raiser, he acknowledged, was in fact a campaign event.

Trump Ordered to Pay $2 Million to Charities for Misuse of Foundation

The president admitted he had used funds raised by the Donald J. Trump Foundation to promote his campaign and pay business debts.

This is Trump formally admitting to illegally misdirecting charitable funds from an event he claimed was a benefit for veterans.

Surely this is on par with the disrespect Obama showed to the armed forces when he asked a marine to hold an umbrella for him?

Republicans and Democrats do it too, and it is wrong on both sides, true equivalence, not false equivalence even if the sum if much smaller:

Source Politico:
Obama 2008 campaign fined $375,000

President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign was fined $375,000 by the Federal Election Commission for campaign reporting violations — one of the largest fees ever levied against a presidential campaign, POLITICO has learned.

The fine — laid out in detail in FEC documents that have yet to be made public — arose from an audit of the campaign, which was published in April. POLITICO obtained a copy of the conciliation agreement detailing the fine, which was sent to Sean Cairncross, the chief lawyer for the Republican National Committee, one of the groups that filed complaints about the campaign’s FEC reporting from 2008.

Here is the Link to Poltico
https://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/ ... 000-085784

I rest my case again.

Wait, you really think being late (waiting more than 48 hour) reporting certain contributions, reporting erroneous contribution dates on some campaign reports, and being late returning some contributions that exceeded the legal limit, is the same as claiming to hold a fund-raiser for veterans which was in fact a campaign event?

You think negligence is equivalent to straight up fraud? And you don't give a shit about veterans being shafted?

I don't think you're supposed to say out loud that your moral compass is shattered.

[San Lumen]

Hey, remember when the Republican party was the party holding veterans high and...

Among Mr. Trump’s admissions in court papers: The charity gave his campaign complete control over disbursing the $2.8 million that the foundation had raised at a fund-raiser for veterans in Iowa in January 2016, only days before the state’s presidential nominating caucuses. The fund-raiser, he acknowledged, was in fact a campaign event.

Trump Ordered to Pay $2 Million to Charities for Misuse of Foundation

The president admitted he had used funds raised by the Donald J. Trump Foundation to promote his campaign and pay business debts.

This is Trump formally admitting to illegally misdirecting charitable funds from an event he claimed was a benefit for veterans.

Surely this is on par with the disrespect Obama showed to the armed forces when he asked a marine to hold an umbrella for him?

Republicans and Democrats do it too, and it is wrong on both sides, true equivalence, not false equivalence even if the sum if much smaller:

Source Politico:
Obama 2008 campaign fined $375,000

President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign was fined $375,000 by the Federal Election Commission for campaign reporting violations — one of the largest fees ever levied against a presidential campaign, POLITICO has learned.

The fine — laid out in detail in FEC documents that have yet to be made public — arose from an audit of the campaign, which was published in April. POLITICO obtained a copy of the conciliation agreement detailing the fine, which was sent to Sean Cairncross, the chief lawyer for the Republican National Committee, one of the groups that filed complaints about the campaign’s FEC reporting from 2008.

Here is the Link to Poltico
https://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/ ... 000-085784

I rest my case again.

Do you have any argument whatsoever? Do you truly see nothing wrong with asking for foreign assistance to win an election?

[Professor Irwin Corey]

Republicans and Democrats do it too, and it is wrong on both sides, true equivalence, not false equivalence even if the sum if much smaller:

Source Politico:
Obama 2008 campaign fined $375,000

President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign was fined $375,000 by the Federal Election Commission for campaign reporting violations — one of the largest fees ever levied against a presidential campaign, POLITICO has learned.

The fine — laid out in detail in FEC documents that have yet to be made public — arose from an audit of the campaign, which was published in April. POLITICO obtained a copy of the conciliation agreement detailing the fine, which was sent to Sean Cairncross, the chief lawyer for the Republican National Committee, one of the groups that filed complaints about the campaign’s FEC reporting from 2008.

Here is the Link to Poltico
https://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/ ... 000-085784

I rest my case again.

Wait, you really think being late (waiting more than 48 hour) reporting certain contributions, reporting erroneous contribution dates on some campaign reports, and being late returning some contributions that exceeded the legal limit, is the same as claiming to hold a fund-raiser for veterans which was in fact a campaign event?

You think negligence is equivalent to straight up fraud? And you don't give a shit about veterans being shafted?

I don't think you're supposed to say out loud that your moral compass is shattered.

fait accompli

[Greater Miami Shores and La Habana Cuba]

Here is my post in full context:
No I am right. Republicans have their base, Democrats have their base. Republicans support Republicans. Democrats support Democrats. Their is no difference. Therefore no whataboutism, therefore true equivalence, no false equivalence as it has been used against me on this thread several times by certain nations, who disagree with me politically on President Trump and the Republicans. I rest my case again.

Republicans have their hard core base, Democrats have their hard core base, lets be honest about it, lets not deny it. I rest my case again.

viewtopic.php?p=36418132#p36418132

I read the whole context, I am still certain that you do not know what it means, hence me asking you what you think it means.

I am sorry but I think I made my point very clear. This whole thing started because a certain nation I cant even remember the name of and I would have to check back the posts, claimed that I worship Trump and the Republicans. So I posted that Republicans support Republicans, and Democrats support democrats. they both have their hard core base of worshipers.

Making fun of my support for President Trump by a few nation just a few minutes ago, granted it is allowed and not actionable. Honestly I cant understand why you guys don't notice it. Any thing I post with comments, links and videos get dismissed as wrong , and anything they post they defend as right. Then if I defend my posts they make fun of my posts and statements to me and each other, the evidence is very clear, reflected in their posts to me and each other, granted it is allowed and not actionable.

If I try to do the same or similar in my defense of my posts and statements, they say I am wrong and they are right, then they make fun of my posts and comments to me and each other. I cant win one according to them. Granted they have not done anything actionable against me.

I give up. I surrender they are all correct and I wrong every time. I think that is what they want me to admit. Sorry for this rant this post has turned into. I cant argue anything without being wrong according to them. I give up.

Whataboutism:
the technique or practice of responding to an accusation or difficult question by making a counteraccusation or raising a different issue.Also called whataboutery.
https://www.bing.com/search?q=whatabout ... =0&PC=MSE1

False Equivalence:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence
"the parliamentary hearing appeared to be an exercise in whataboutism"

Equivlance - I could not find a true equivalence definition.
1. The state or condition of being equivalent; equality. 2. Mathematics An equivalence relation. 3. Logic The relationship that holds for two propositions that are either both true or both false, so that the affirmation of one and the denial of the other results in contradiction.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/equivalence
I am finally correct on something on this thread, I am correct on this one.

I rest my case again.

[Gravlen]

Wait, you really think being late (waiting more than 48 hour) reporting certain contributions, reporting erroneous contribution dates on some campaign reports, and being late returning some contributions that exceeded the legal limit, is the same as claiming to hold a fund-raiser for veterans which was in fact a campaign event?

You think negligence is equivalent to straight up fraud? And you don't give a shit about veterans being shafted?

I don't think you're supposed to say out loud that your moral compass is shattered.

fait accompli

I don't know why, but that term always make me want Crêpes.

[Neutraligon]

I read the whole context, I am still certain that you do not know what it means, hence me asking you what you think it means.

I am sorry but I think I made my point clear. This whole thing started because a certain nation I cant even remember the name of and I would have to check back the posts, claimed that I worship Trump and the Republicans. So I posted that Republicans support Republicans, and Democrats support democrats. they both have their hard core base of worshipers.

Making fun of my support for President Trump by a few nation just a few minutes ago, granted it is allowed and not actionable. Honestly I cant understand why you guys don't notice it. Any thing I post with comments, links and videos get dismissed as wrong , and anything they post they defend as right. Then if I defend my posts they make fun of my posts and statements, the evidence is very clear, reflected in their posts to me, granted it is allowed and not actionable.

If I try to do the same or similar in my defense of my posts and statements, they say I am wrong and they are right, then they make fun of my posts and comments to me and each other. I cant win one according to them. Granted they have not done anything actionable against me.

I give up. I surrender they are all correct and I wrong every time. I think that is what they want me to admit. Sorry for this rant this post has turned into. I cant argue anything without being wrong according to them. I give up.

Whataboutism:
the technique or practice of responding to an accusation or difficult question by making a counteraccusation or raising a different issue.Also called whataboutery.
https://www.bing.com/search?q=whatabout ... =0&PC=MSE1

False Equivalence:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence
"the parliamentary hearing appeared to be an exercise in whataboutism"

Equivlance - I could not find a true equivalence definition.
1. The state or condition of being equivalent; equality. 2. Mathematics An equivalence relation. 3. Logic The relationship that holds for two propositions that are either both true or both false, so that the affirmation of one and the denial of the other results in contradiction.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/equivalence
I am finally correct on something on this thread, I am correct on this one.

I rest my case again.

yeah you confirmed you really do not understand what whataboutism is, even after linking the definition.

I will give an example.
Sandra: Bob is such a hypocrite for complaining about pushy vegans while also being a pushy meat eater
Bill: Yeah but what about Jane pushing for everyone to eat vegan

You will note that Bill did not respond to Sandra's point about Bob and brought up the irrelevant Jane to distract from the issue of Bob.

In your case, Republicans where brought up as cherry picking something. You then essentially said, yeah but hat about Democrat cherry picking. False equivalency has nothing to do with it at all it is more a subset of the tu quoque fallacy

[Professor Irwin Corey]

fait accompli

I don't know why, but that term always make me want Crêpes.

My Aunt Suzette always said the exact same thing.

[Greater Miami Shores and La Habana Cuba]

I am sorry but I think I made my point clear. This whole thing started because a certain nation I cant even remember the name of and I would have to check back the posts, claimed that I worship Trump and the Republicans. So I posted that Republicans support Republicans, and Democrats support democrats. they both have their hard core base of worshipers.

Making fun of my support for President Trump by a few nation just a few minutes ago, granted it is allowed and not actionable. Honestly I cant understand why you guys don't notice it. Any thing I post with comments, links and videos get dismissed as wrong , and anything they post they defend as right. Then if I defend my posts they make fun of my posts and statements, the evidence is very clear, reflected in their posts to me, granted it is allowed and not actionable.

If I try to do the same or similar in my defense of my posts and statements, they say I am wrong and they are right, then they make fun of my posts and comments to me and each other. I cant win one according to them. Granted they have not done anything actionable against me.

I give up. I surrender they are all correct and I wrong every time. I think that is what they want me to admit. Sorry for this rant this post has turned into. I cant argue anything without being wrong according to them. I give up.

Whataboutism:
the technique or practice of responding to an accusation or difficult question by making a counteraccusation or raising a different issue.Also called whataboutery.
https://www.bing.com/search?q=whatabout ... =0&PC=MSE1

False Equivalence:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence
"the parliamentary hearing appeared to be an exercise in whataboutism"

Equivlance - I could not find a true equivalence definition.
1. The state or condition of being equivalent; equality. 2. Mathematics An equivalence relation. 3. Logic The relationship that holds for two propositions that are either both true or both false, so that the affirmation of one and the denial of the other results in contradiction.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/equivalence
I am finally correct on something on this thread, I am correct on this one.

I rest my case again.

yeah you confirmed you really do not understand what whataboutism is, even after linking the definition.

I will give an example.
Sandra: Bob is such a hypocrite for complaining about pushy vegans while also being a pushy meat eater
Bill: Yeah but what about Jane pushing for everyone to eat vegan

You will note that Bill did not respond to Sandra's point about Bob and brought up the irrelevant Jane to distract from the issue of Bob.

In your case, Republicans where brought up as cherry picking something. You then essentially said, yeah but hat about Democrat cherry picking.

I strongly and respectfully disagree with you that I don't understand it.
ok what I said is they both cherry pick when they can, and I am correct, but in this case Adam Schiff and the Democrats choose their witnesses and transcripts to release it their way to attack Trump. The Republicans cant do any thing to defend Trump, thanks to Democrat Adam Schiff.

Anything they say gets attacked similar to how it gets attacked on NS.

I Predict the open public hearings in the house, are going to be similar to the kangaroo court attacks by the Democrats against judge Brett Kavanaugh, to destroy Kavanaugh's reputation and high qualifications as a US Supreme Court Justice, luckily Justice Brett Kavanaugh won.

For which we went through NS World War 3 on the Kavanaugh hearing threads especially the last one, which was NS World War 3. I Predict we will have NS World Wars 4 5 6 respectively on the maga threads as I have previously predicted.

Granted I read Fox News, Sean Hannity, Town Hall, One America News Network, the Federalists, the Atlantic, Breitbart, Red State.org and all the other right wing news sources. Which according to them are biased right wing propaganda in defense of President Trump. (please excuse my using these terms in this particular case) and their leftist sources as the truth and nothing but the truth.

I do read MSNBC, Yahoo and Politico and have posted articles, quotes and videos from those leftists sources and I still cant win one according to them, than my rant above happens.

I give up, this is just a figure of speech.

I guess you all don't agree these other nations are doing this to me above in my rant. which I recognize is not actionable against them. I don't hold any grudges against them. You the Moderators know my policy and my new policy I have been forced to make. I don't like reporting anyone against me or against others. but now I have no choice but to report any nation I think might have broken a rule against me. Perhaps they will eventually ease off on my so called rant above. Also with my new kinder gentler style of posting I am trying to post, at least I am trying.

Notice I have no problems with the 18 or so nations on my anti Cuba thread, my pet issue on NS for obvious reasons or on any other issues. I only have a problem with the 18 or so nations when I defend President Trump, the evidence is very clear.

They don't question or put down my sources on Cuba or on any other issues only when I defend President Trump, what a coincidence.

Farnhamia is right I am always or usually very civil, so I believe I will never break an NS Rule and
get banned from NS, which I love.

Granted I messed up using multiple nations to post on multiple thread, because I wanted those main nations to have a connection to those threads, and I switch back and forth between those nations because I spend a lot of times on those nations back and forth.

I have never intended to use any of my now 153 Plus nations to evade the foe list or ignore list as I call it. It would be very stupid of me or any nation to do and get banned from NS. No matter how my statements on my post or on the moderation report sounded.

I proud that no moderator has ever given me an unofficial warning, official warning, or even a one day ban from nation states.

I have a clean record that I am very proud of and wish to keep clean. I plant to be on nation states for the rest of my life and from beyond the grave if possible, I love NS for the general forum and RP threads, which I can post with real world nations, statistics and real world leaders, I hate NS stats.

I believe their is a God and spirits, because of the spirits I saw in my house in Cuba and the little old lady sitting in the rocking chair in my house in Cuba, since then I believe in Spirits and God. Perhaps you have seen my posts on it. It is interesting reading. I can look up the links for you if you wish to read it.

Sorry for the long response, when I get writing and creative I cant stop, it is a bad habit of mine.

Thank you Neutraligion for your posts.

[Professor Irwin Corey]

Thank you my Friend lol. I know I can always count on you to defend me.

I might consider your renaming suggestion for the threads. Or should it be something like At the Shores of Miami?

Are you sure?

[Greater Miami Shores and La Habana Cuba]

I might consider your renaming suggestion for the threads. Or should it be something like At the Shores of Miami?

Are you sure?

See what I mean? granted it is not actionable against them, I rest my case again.

I suggest the maga threads be named:
3 - Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearings NS World War 3
4 - Trump Impeachment Inquiry NS World War 4
5 - Trump Articles of Impeachment NS World War 5
6 - Trump Conviction or non Conviction NS World War 6

This is a very serious suggestion to Nakena and the Moderations I am suggesting.

[Nakena]

Are you sure?

See what I mean? granted it is not actionable against them, I rest my case again.

I suggest the maga threads be named:
3 - Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearings NS World War 3
4 - Trump Impeachment Inquiry NS World War 4
5 - Trump Articles of Impeachment NS World War 5
6 - Trump Conviction or non Conviction NS World War 6

This is a very serious suggestion to Nakena and the Moderations I am suggesting.

Regional polls?

[Greater Miami Shores]

Are you sure?

See what I mean? granted it is not actionable against them, I rest my case again.

I suggest the maga threads be named:
3 - Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearings NS World War 3
4 - Trump Impeachment Inquiry NS World War 4
5 - Trump Articles of Impeachment NS World War 5
6 - Trump Conviction or non Conviction NS World War 6

This is a very serious suggestion to Nakena and the Moderations I am suggesting.

To the Moderators sorry I posted from the wrong nation it was an accident since I spend time on all my nations and I switch back and forth between them. I will try to be careful in the future. I will now switch back to Greater Miami Shores.

But I am very serious about the Maga Thread names suggestions above to Nakena and the Moderators.

Thank You.

[Greater Miami Shores]

See what I mean? granted it is not actionable against them, I rest my case again.

I suggest the maga threads be named:
3 - Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearings NS World War 3
4 - Trump Impeachment Inquiry NS World War 4
5 - Trump Articles of Impeachment NS World War 5
6 - Trump Conviction or non Conviction NS World War 6

This is a very serious suggestion to Nakena and the Moderations I am suggesting.

Regional polls?

To the Moderators I am now on my Greater Miami Shores nation as I should be, see my apology post above, and will answer Nakena's Post from this nation.

My Friend Awesome Idea I can make these regional public polls, the only problem is they are only a one option poll. I tried very hard to suggest to the Moderators that they can make them multi option public polls on the general, RP and regional forums. They say it cant be done, but I really think they don't want too.

I will post them on the Poll dispatch link I sent you through the TGs and it is always on my Poll dispatch for you to find.

The regional Polls can be linked to the Threads OP introduction pages from the nationstates poll page and our regional polls, but it would be considered spam, I once asked a moderator about it and this is what he told him. I cant remember the Moderators name nor would I post it.

Thank you for your interest.

[Vassenor]

Are you sure?

See what I mean? granted it is not actionable against them, I rest my case again.

I suggest the maga threads be named:
3 - Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearings NS World War 3
4 - Trump Impeachment Inquiry NS World War 4
5 - Trump Articles of Impeachment NS World War 5
6 - Trump Conviction or non Conviction NS World War 6

This is a very serious suggestion to Nakena and the Moderations I am suggesting.

You have no power here, Gandalf the Grey.

[Austria-Bohemia-Hungary]

See what I mean? granted it is not actionable against them, I rest my case again.

I suggest the maga threads be named:
3 - Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearings NS World War 3
4 - Trump Impeachment Inquiry NS World War 4
5 - Trump Articles of Impeachment NS World War 5
6 - Trump Conviction or non Conviction NS World War 6

This is a very serious suggestion to Nakena and the Moderations I am suggesting.

You have no power here, Gandalf the Grey.

That's an insult to Gandalf...

[Telconi]

You have no power here, Gandalf the Grey.

That's an insult to Gandalf...

And King Theoden

[Ghost Land]

Are you sure?

See what I mean? granted it is not actionable against them, I rest my case again.

I suggest the maga threads be named:
3 - Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearings NS World War 3
4 - Trump Impeachment Inquiry NS World War 4
5 - Trump Articles of Impeachment NS World War 5
6 - Trump Conviction or non Conviction NS World War 6

This is a very serious suggestion to Nakena and the Moderations I am suggesting.

I'd say 4 and 5 kind of blend together, especially considering the impeachment inquiry was launched almost two months ago if my memory is correct and we're still having the same back-and-forth discussions about it. The process is taking and will continue to take much longer than I feel the initial proposing congresspeople had expected, simply because impeachment is no laughing matter, and at this point I would be surprised if a decision to convict or not to convict is even made before the 2020 election takes place, which is less than a year from now already.

For the record, Alberto, I too know what it's like to have unpopular opinions (I was the only conservative in my 11th-grade government class, for instance), and I sincerely do appreciate your standing up for yourself and for the right wing as a whole. Cheers to you man, from the Evil Republic and Number 600 Military Power of Ghost Land.

[Maineiacs]

That's an insult to Gandalf...

And King Theoden

Hell, that's even an insult to Saruman.

[Greater Miami Shores]

See what I mean? granted it is not actionable against them, I rest my case again.

I suggest the maga threads be named:
3 - Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearings NS World War 3
4 - Trump Impeachment Inquiry NS World War 4
5 - Trump Articles of Impeachment NS World War 5
6 - Trump Conviction or non Conviction NS World War 6

This is a very serious suggestion to Nakena and the Moderations I am suggesting.

I'd say 4 and 5 kind of blend together, especially considering the impeachment inquiry was launched almost two months ago if my memory is correct and we're still having the same back-and-forth discussions about it. The process is taking and will continue to take much longer than I feel the initial proposing congresspeople had expected, simply because impeachment is no laughing matter, and at this point I would be surprised if a decision to convict or not to convict is even made before the 2020 election takes place, which is less than a year from now already.

For the record, Alberto, I too know what it's like to have unpopular opinions (I was the only conservative in my 11th-grade government class, for instance), and I sincerely do appreciate your standing up for yourself and for the right wing as a whole. Cheers to you man, from the Evil Republic and Number 600 Military Power of Ghost Land.

Thank you Ghostland, these suggestions of mine to Nakena and the Moderators are very serious suggestions, they can accept or not, and I will thank them politely regardless if they don't accept them:
I respectfully disagree with you 4 and 5 blend together. NS World War 4 is the impeachment inquiry and NS World War 5 is the Articles of Impeachment Trial, and NS World War 6 is the Conviction or non Conviction war.

I fixed number 5 for you: 5 - Trump Articles of Impeachment Trial NS World War 5
I fixed number 6 for you: 6 - Trump Conviction or non Conviction Trial NS World War 6

You gave me the idea, and I give you credit where credit is due.

You Poor Dude I feel your Pain, You were the only conservative in your 11th-grade government class. I feel your Pain like for real Dude, this is California Valley Talk, I used to live in Palo Alto California.

[Zurkerx]

Ah Mark Levin and his guests (I think it's Matt Gaetz and Mo Brooks), obscuring the facts while making up bullshit in the process. Got to love. I say this because it's on TV that the family is watching and I'm forced to listen...

By the way, they were talking about how Biden bragged about holding a $1 Billion dollars in aid from the Ukraine unless they fire the prosecutor, which to them meant stopping the prosecutor from investigating Hunter Biden at Burisma despite the EU, G7, IMF, EBRD, and others wanting him removed because of his inability to stop corruption and the fact that the investigation into Burisma was dominant before his removal. Not to mention, Volker even didn't find the allegations credible. But hey, alternative facts.

Bidens in Ukraine: An Explainer

[Gormwood]

See what I mean? granted it is not actionable against them, I rest my case again.

I suggest the maga threads be named:
3 - Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearings NS World War 3
4 - Trump Impeachment Inquiry NS World War 4
5 - Trump Articles of Impeachment NS World War 5
6 - Trump Conviction or non Conviction NS World War 6

This is a very serious suggestion to Nakena and the Moderations I am suggesting.

You have no power here, Gandalf the Grey.

So basically he wants to virtue signal how reality is picking on poor innocent Donnie.

[Farnhamia]

Are you sure?

See what I mean? granted it is not actionable against them, I rest my case again.

I suggest the maga threads be named:
3 - Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearings NS World War 3
4 - Trump Impeachment Inquiry NS World War 4
5 - Trump Articles of Impeachment NS World War 5
6 - Trump Conviction or non Conviction NS World War 6

This is a very serious suggestion to Nakena and the Moderations I am suggesting.

No, but thanks for the suggestions.

[Greater Miami Shores]

See what I mean? granted it is not actionable against them, I rest my case again.

I suggest the maga threads be named:
3 - Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearings NS World War 3
4 - Trump Impeachment Inquiry NS World War 4
5 - Trump Articles of Impeachment NS World War 5
6 - Trump Conviction or non Conviction NS World War 6

This is a very serious suggestion to Nakena and the Moderations I am suggesting.

No, but thanks for the suggestions.

Thank you Farnhamia for reviewing my suggestions and making your decision.

Farnhamia I apologize to you the Moderator, I had accidentally posted with my Greater Miami Shores and La Habana Cuba Nation by an honest mistake and accident. I switched back to Greater Miami Shores when I realized my honest mistake and error:

My Evidence and apology Post to the Moderators, I thought they would see on the thread, when I realized my honest error, it was an accident:To the Moderators sorry I posted from the wrong nation it was an accident since I spend time on all my nations and I switch back and forth between them. I will try to be careful in the future. I will now switch back to Greater Miami Shores.
But I am very serious about the Maga Thread names suggestions above to Nakena and the Moderators.
viewtopic.php?p=36418575#p36418575

Greater Miami Shores Alberto.

[The Black Forrest]

No, but thanks for the suggestions.

Thank you Farnhamia for reviewing my suggestions and making your decision.

Farnhamia I apologize to you the Moderator, I had accidentally posted with my Greater Miami Shores and La Habana Cuba Nation by an honest mistake and accident. I switched back to Greater Miami Shores when I realized my honest mistake and error:

My Evidence and apology Post to the Moderators, I thought they would see on the thread, when I realized my honest error, it was an accident:To the Moderators sorry I posted from the wrong nation it was an accident since I spend time on all my nations and I switch back and forth between them. I will try to be careful in the future. I will now switch back to Greater Miami Shores.
But I am very serious about the Maga Thread names suggestions above to Nakena and the Moderators.
viewtopic.php?p=36418575#p36418575

Greater Miami Shores Alberto.

She answered you.