Was it a minor impact overall or no impact?
Advertisement
by Diopolis » Fri Oct 18, 2019 7:21 pm
by Ifreann » Fri Oct 18, 2019 7:41 pm
Diopolis wrote:Ifreann wrote:Was it a minor impact overall or no impact?
I’m too tired by now to argue over semantics. Chic fil a became the most popular fast food restaurant in the country after the boycott began but got driven out of certain markets entirely. That encapsulates my point about the effects of a boycott.
by Greed and Death » Fri Oct 18, 2019 8:42 pm
by Greed and Death » Fri Oct 18, 2019 8:45 pm
Ifreann wrote:Diopolis wrote:I’m too tired by now to argue over semantics. Chic fil a became the most popular fast food restaurant in the country after the boycott began but got driven out of certain markets entirely. That encapsulates my point about the effects of a boycott.
I have you over here saying that the backlash to the boycott made Chic-fil-a so popular that corporate profits rose. But I have Elwher and TEL over there saying that corporate's income is tied to the number of restaurants open, and to hurt corporate you need to shut a franchise down. So, what, did two new restaurants open for every one that closed?
You're all arguing against boycotts from mutually exclusive angles. It's too damaging! It doesn't do anything! It helps actually!
by UniversalCommons » Sat Oct 26, 2019 11:03 am
Aureumterra wrote:Companies should be able fire for any reason, if the higher ups think its bad for business, they have the right to fire
by Vetalia » Sat Oct 26, 2019 3:10 pm
Aureumterra wrote:Companies should be able fire for any reason, if the higher ups think its bad for business, they have the right to fire
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Celritannia, Dimetrodon Empire, Plan Neonie, Port Carverton, Republics of the Solar Union, Rio Cana, Talibanada, Uiiop, Zancostan
Advertisement