NATION

PASSWORD

50,000 GM Workers on Strike

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Republic of Fore
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1552
Founded: Apr 10, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The Republic of Fore » Thu Sep 19, 2019 4:35 pm

Greed and Death wrote:
The Republic of Fore wrote:Oh it probably is. But one can always hope. Maybe they'll pull a Washington Redskins and hire a bunch of scabs but try to cover it up.

The contract lapsed 2 days ago so GM might be able to hire strike breakers. Though UAW is notorious for collecting scab lists with name and home address and accidentally to leaking said list to strikers.

You would likely be subjecting yourself and your family to harassment.

Even better, sue for harassment and get a nice cash pay out.

User avatar
The Republic of Fore
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1552
Founded: Apr 10, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The Republic of Fore » Thu Sep 19, 2019 4:37 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
The Republic of Fore wrote:Oh it probably is. But one can always hope. Maybe they'll pull a Washington Redskins and hire a bunch of scabs but try to cover it up.

You do realize that the striking workers can block the scabs from working right?

And you realize if they try to get violent the scabs or the company can have them thrown in prison right?

User avatar
Imbalistan
Envoy
 
Posts: 246
Founded: May 22, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Imbalistan » Thu Sep 19, 2019 4:39 pm

Sigh. While unions can be great, I have a feeling that this will result in a unfair deal which will result in much higher wages and even more benefits, and then cause GM to spiral a bit more downward.
Best Quote:
Chan Island wrote:And I'm expecting this thread to devolve into a
racist and/or religious and/or politics shitshow within 3 pages.
I LOVE YOU THE WAY YOU ARE
Bismillah, no, we will not let you go!
#YangGang2020

User avatar
Shrillland
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22231
Founded: Apr 12, 2010
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Shrillland » Thu Sep 19, 2019 4:40 pm

Imbalistan wrote:Sigh. While unions can be great, I have a feeling that this will result in a unfair deal which will result in much higher wages and even more benefits, and then cause GM to spiral a bit more downward.


What's unfair about that?
Last edited by Shrillland on Thu Sep 19, 2019 4:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
How America Came to This, by Kowani: Racialised Politics, Ideological Media Gaslighting, and What It All Means For The Future
Plebiscite Plaza 2024
Confused by the names I use for House districts? Here's a primer!
In 1963, Doctor Who taught us all we need to know about politics when a cave woman said, "Old men see no further than tomorrow's meat".

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Thu Sep 19, 2019 4:40 pm

The Republic of Fore wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:You do realize that the striking workers can block the scabs from working right?

And you realize if they try to get violent the scabs or the company can have them thrown in prison right?


Don't need to get violent to make people suffer. Just treat the scabs like shit and it's normally enough discouragement.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Thu Sep 19, 2019 7:44 pm

Telconi wrote:
The Black Forrest wrote:
Cobra is fracking expensive. Just got laid off. MAGA! Best economy ever.

Looking at the cost sheet; I just don’t get why people can’t understand the uninsured ranks are expanding again.

Luckily the wife is employeed.....


Never had to make use of COBRA, but according to my benefits package as provided by my union, the company pays just shy of 1,000 dollars a month on insurance benefits.

So basically, I would need to rustle up 1,000 bucks a month to keep my insurance if I was let go.


As I said before. That is what the strike fund is for.

It is not the bloody worker expected to cover this, it is the Union expected to cover this.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Thu Sep 19, 2019 7:57 pm

Telconi wrote:
The Republic of Fore wrote:And you realize if they try to get violent the scabs or the company can have them thrown in prison right?


Don't need to get violent to make people suffer. Just treat the scabs like shit and it's normally enough discouragement.


Define treat like shit.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
US-SSR
Minister
 
Posts: 2313
Founded: Aug 02, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby US-SSR » Thu Sep 19, 2019 8:10 pm

Shrillland wrote:
Imbalistan wrote:Sigh. While unions can be great, I have a feeling that this will result in a unfair deal which will result in much higher wages and even more benefits, and then cause GM to spiral a bit more downward.


What's unfair about that?


It's so obviously unfair that the top 1% only control half the wealth of the nation. How is America going to be Made Great Again unless they can get still more?

Image
Last edited by US-SSR on Thu Sep 19, 2019 8:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
8:46

We're not going to control the pandemic!

It is a slaughter and not just a political dispute.

"The scraps of narcissism, the rotten remnants of conspiracy theories, the offal of sour grievance, the half-eaten bits of resentment flow by. They do not cohere. But they move in the same, insistent current of self, self, self."

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Thu Sep 19, 2019 8:24 pm

The Republic of Fore wrote:
Greed and Death wrote:The contract lapsed 2 days ago so GM might be able to hire strike breakers. Though UAW is notorious for collecting scab lists with name and home address and accidentally to leaking said list to strikers.

You would likely be subjecting yourself and your family to harassment.

Even better, sue for harassment and get a nice cash pay out.


Not really. The goons who harass people are normally judgement proof, and difficult to tie to the Union (which has deep pockets and is worth suing).
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Thu Sep 19, 2019 9:23 pm

Greed and Death wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Don't need to get violent to make people suffer. Just treat the scabs like shit and it's normally enough discouragement.


Define treat like shit.


Just shun them, don't look out for them or back them up.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
The Republic of Fore
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1552
Founded: Apr 10, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The Republic of Fore » Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:48 pm

Telconi wrote:
The Republic of Fore wrote:And you realize if they try to get violent the scabs or the company can have them thrown in prison right?


Don't need to get violent to make people suffer. Just treat the scabs like shit and it's normally enough discouragement.

Not for me, it doesn't concern me if some whiny brats don't like me. Especially when their displeasure comes with the reward of a great paying job.

User avatar
The Republic of Fore
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1552
Founded: Apr 10, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The Republic of Fore » Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:50 pm

Greed and Death wrote:
The Republic of Fore wrote:Even better, sue for harassment and get a nice cash pay out.


Not really. The goons who harass people are normally judgement proof, and difficult to tie to the Union (which has deep pockets and is worth suing).

Sue them into bankruptcy. Take their home, their car, whatever they might have that could be worth something. It's as much about punishing them for harassment as it is actually getting money.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163852
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Fri Sep 20, 2019 6:19 am

Petrolheadia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Cars would be cheaper if you didn't have to pay for second yachts for the millionaires who own the companies.

Or just pay for the retirement of those whose retirement depends on GM's stock.

I thought you didn't like paying for benefits for people who aren't working.
Or pay for GM's continued existence in case losses come.

Which is how money paid to shareholders works.


The Republic of Fore wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:You do realize that the striking workers can block the scabs from working right?

And you realize if they try to get violent the scabs or the company can have them thrown in prison right?

Getting someone thrown in prison doesn't unbreak bones.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Torrocca
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27785
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Torrocca » Fri Sep 20, 2019 6:30 am

The Republic of Fore wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Don't need to get violent to make people suffer. Just treat the scabs like shit and it's normally enough discouragement.

Not for me, it doesn't concern me if some whiny brats don't like me. Especially when their displeasure comes with the reward of a great paying job.


Sure do love the smell of class betrayal in the morning.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They call me Torra, but you can call me... anytime (☞⌐■_■)☞
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE 1: Anything depicted IC on this nation does NOT reflect my IRL views or values, and is not endorsed by me.
NOTICE 2: Most RP and every OOC post by me prior to 2023 are no longer endorsed nor tolerated by me. I've since put on my adult pants!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 129505
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Fri Sep 20, 2019 6:41 am

An article on the topic

https://www.wsj.com/articles/behind-the ... 1568937301


Tldr, GM thinks they need to change to stay competitive in the market and sees the market radically changing, and what the union is asking for, will not let them. The union thinks it deserves to share in profits of GM and should not lose jobs.
Last edited by Ethel mermania on Fri Sep 20, 2019 6:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
https://www.hvst.com/posts/the-clash-of ... s-wl2TQBpY

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
--S. Huntington

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 

--H. Kissenger

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78484
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Fri Sep 20, 2019 7:37 am

The Republic of Fore wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Don't need to get violent to make people suffer. Just treat the scabs like shit and it's normally enough discouragement.

Not for me, it doesn't concern me if some whiny brats don't like me. Especially when their displeasure comes with the reward of a great paying job.

I’m sure your family feels the same way right? It’s not like they wouldn’t mind having death threats sent to them or having their vehicles sabotaged.
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Fri Sep 20, 2019 7:58 am

The Republic of Fore wrote:
Greed and Death wrote:
Not really. The goons who harass people are normally judgement proof, and difficult to tie to the Union (which has deep pockets and is worth suing).

Sue them into bankruptcy. Take their home, their car, whatever they might have that could be worth something. It's as much about punishing them for harassment as it is actually getting money.


In most states it is very difficult to get a person's home. Some states protect all houses others only protect the first ~100,000
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/j/judgment-proof.asp

Cars under a certain value are also protected, as are all retirement funds.
Last edited by Greed and Death on Fri Sep 20, 2019 10:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Chestaan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6977
Founded: Sep 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chestaan » Fri Sep 20, 2019 8:40 am

Telconi wrote:
Chestaan wrote:
GM is making billion of profits per year. They can afford to increase wages without raising prices.


They don't wanna tho. Gonna have to make em.


Absolutely. The worker had no choice but to take to the picket line
Council Communist
TG me if you want to chat, especially about economics, you can never have enough discussions on economics.Especially game theory :)
Economic Left/Right: -9.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.62

Getting the Guillotine

User avatar
Special Aromas
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 191
Founded: Sep 11, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Special Aromas » Sat Sep 21, 2019 7:17 am

GM workers sacrificed their benefits twice on two occasions during the GFC and subsequent recession, when GM was nearing bankruptcy.

Just 9 years later, in 2018, GM has recovered to the point where last year paid $2.2 billion dollars in dividends to shareholders.

GM is clearly profitable again, why shouldn't their workers receive their benefits back? Are they not owed that after helping to save the company?

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Sat Sep 21, 2019 7:48 am

Petrolheadia wrote:
Diarcesia wrote:
Only a law fill make the companies will do that, and it'll not pass because "muh profits".

I wouldn't be happy to buy some non-working guy's insurance when I just want to buy a car.


Which is why having healthcare provision tied to employment is fucking moronic.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Sat Sep 21, 2019 7:52 am

Petrolheadia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Because America is a silly place where you need insurance to get healthcare, and people shouldn't lose access to healthcare because they're in a labour dispute with their employer.

I'm sure it's a great idea to have a company pay people, no matter what they're doing. Worked wonderful for the folks at British Leyland.


You're the only one talking about companies paying for healthcare.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
The South Falls
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13353
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The South Falls » Sat Sep 21, 2019 7:53 am

They'll most likely hire scabs, or outsource their labor.
This is an MT nation that reflects some of my beliefs, trade deals and debate always welcome! Call me TeaSF. A level 8, according to This Index.


Political Compass Results:

Economic: -5.5
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51
I make dumb jokes. I'm really serious about that.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Sat Sep 21, 2019 7:53 am

Petrolheadia wrote:
Torrocca wrote:
So basically you're just showing that these companies want to reduce wages and the UAW is trying to get them raised instead.

Thanks for making it clear who the good people are in this situation.

And car prices come out of nowhere...


You haven't read your own source, have you? Or did you just miss the "$250/car" bit?
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4364
Founded: Apr 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Sat Sep 21, 2019 9:00 am

Thermodolia wrote:
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Does it even count as a stereotype if it's confirmed by IQ tests?

Yes because IQ tests are bullshit

I see. And what is your proposed alternative means to assess intelligence?
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.

How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

User avatar
Chestaan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6977
Founded: Sep 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chestaan » Sat Sep 21, 2019 9:20 am

Special Aromas wrote:GM workers sacrificed their benefits twice on two occasions during the GFC and subsequent recession, when GM was nearing bankruptcy.

Just 9 years later, in 2018, GM has recovered to the point where last year paid $2.2 billion dollars in dividends to shareholders.

GM is clearly profitable again, why shouldn't their workers receive their benefits back? Are they not owed that after helping to save the company?



Unfortunately it seems that many companies, profitable or not, used the recession as an excuse to cut workers pay and benefits. Everyone was told this was temporary but that now doesn't seem to be the case.
Council Communist
TG me if you want to chat, especially about economics, you can never have enough discussions on economics.Especially game theory :)
Economic Left/Right: -9.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.62

Getting the Guillotine

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Beliras, Cerespasia, Cerula, Dimetrodon Empire, Emotional Support Crocodile, Fartsniffage, General TN, Inferior, Kreushia, Nimzonia, Pale Dawn, Shidei, The Ambis, Three Galaxies, Varsemia, Zantalio

Advertisement

Remove ads