They're usually so good at inventing things I'd have thought they'd have the imagination.
Advertisement
by Greater vakolicci haven » Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:10 pm
by The Chuck » Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:10 pm
In-Character Advertisement Space:
The Chuck wholly endorses Wolf Armaments, Lauzanexport CDT, and
Silverport Dockyards Ltd.
by Fartsniffage » Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:11 pm
by The Chuck » Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:13 pm
In-Character Advertisement Space:
The Chuck wholly endorses Wolf Armaments, Lauzanexport CDT, and
Silverport Dockyards Ltd.
by Diopolis » Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:13 pm
Crockerland wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
Control of the poll buddy. All I'm asking for is that it's split equally between they two sides of this very contentious debate.
A debate?! Even a middle-school debate club would be insulted by the comparison.
One side of the "debate" believes in things like "fully-semi-automatic guns", "assault weapons", "massacre machine gun magazines", and "30 caliber clips" that let you "dispense 30 bullets within half a second", one side wants to ban things like "magazines that can hold multiple bullets".
Gun control is a "debate" like Mike Tyson vs Honey Boo Boo is the boxing match of the century!
by The Two Jerseys » Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:15 pm
by Greater vakolicci haven » Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:15 pm
Diopolis wrote:Crockerland wrote:A debate?! Even a middle-school debate club would be insulted by the comparison.
One side of the "debate" believes in things like "fully-semi-automatic guns", "assault weapons", "massacre machine gun magazines", and "30 caliber clips" that let you "dispense 30 bullets within half a second", one side wants to ban things like "magazines that can hold multiple bullets".
Gun control is a "debate" like Mike Tyson vs Honey Boo Boo is the boxing match of the century!
I’ve occasionally run into gun control proponents I respect. It is not common.
by Diopolis » Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:17 pm
by Licana » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:03 pm
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:There is a complaint lodged in Moderation that this OP is against gun control, and that a pro gun control OP should be next.
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".
by Grinning Dragon » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:23 pm
by Hammer Britannia » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:25 pm
Grinning Dragon wrote:LOL Palmetto State Armory, trolling again.
Palmetto State Armory Now Offering the New ‘No Beto’ Stripped AR-15 Lower
(Image)
by Telconi » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:30 pm
Grinning Dragon wrote:LOL Palmetto State Armory, trolling again.
Palmetto State Armory Now Offering the New ‘No Beto’ Stripped AR-15 Lower
(Image)
by Gig em Aggies » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:45 pm
Telconi wrote:Grinning Dragon wrote:LOL Palmetto State Armory, trolling again.
Palmetto State Armory Now Offering the New ‘No Beto’ Stripped AR-15 Lower
(Image)
That's freaking genius.
by The Chuck » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:54 pm
In-Character Advertisement Space:
The Chuck wholly endorses Wolf Armaments, Lauzanexport CDT, and
Silverport Dockyards Ltd.
by Hammer Britannia » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:55 pm
The Chuck wrote:Hot topic of recent note which led to a little title change, Beto saying he's coming for the ARs and Aks... anyone find it a bit ironic that the person with a burglary charge is also the one wanting to get rid of the means of defending oneself and one's property?
by Telconi » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:56 pm
The Chuck wrote:Hot topic of recent note which led to a little title change, Beto saying he's coming for the ARs and Aks... anyone find it a bit ironic that the person with a burglary charge is also the one wanting to get rid of the means of defending oneself and one's property?
by US-SSR » Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:56 pm
by US-SSR » Mon Sep 16, 2019 5:01 pm
The Chuck wrote:Hot topic of recent note which led to a little title change, Beto saying he's coming for the ARs and Aks... anyone find it a bit ironic that the person with a burglary charge is also the one wanting to get rid of the means of defending oneself and one's property?
by Arengin Union » Mon Sep 16, 2019 5:03 pm
by Telconi » Mon Sep 16, 2019 5:03 pm
US-SSR wrote:The Chuck wrote:Hot topic of recent note which led to a little title change, Beto saying he's coming for the ARs and Aks... anyone find it a bit ironic that the person with a burglary charge is also the one wanting to get rid of the means of defending oneself and one's property?
As noted government has the authority to regulate the right to bear arms. What kind of life -- and in what state of the Union --does one have to live that military-style weapons are the only reasonable means to defend yourself or your property? I live in a city. When I need defense I call the cops and they send me someone who not only has a gun but knows how to use it better than I ever will.
by Dresderstan » Mon Sep 16, 2019 5:04 pm
Arengin Union wrote:Beto and the Democratic crowd confirmed what I've known for years.
by Pannerstone » Mon Sep 16, 2019 5:05 pm
US-SSR wrote:The Chuck wrote:Hot topic of recent note which led to a little title change, Beto saying he's coming for the ARs and Aks... anyone find it a bit ironic that the person with a burglary charge is also the one wanting to get rid of the means of defending oneself and one's property?
As noted government has the authority to regulate the right to bear arms. What kind of life -- and in what state of the Union --does one have to live that military-style weapons are the only reasonable means to defend yourself or your property? I live in a city. When I need defense I call the cops and they send me someone who not only has a gun but knows how to use it better than I ever will.
by Hammer Britannia » Mon Sep 16, 2019 5:05 pm
Telconi wrote:US-SSR wrote:
As noted government has the authority to regulate the right to bear arms. What kind of life -- and in what state of the Union --does one have to live that military-style weapons are the only reasonable means to defend yourself or your property? I live in a city. When I need defense I call the cops and they send me someone who not only has a gun but knows how to use it better than I ever will.
The irony of this post and your flag is palpable.
by Diopolis » Mon Sep 16, 2019 5:06 pm
The Chuck wrote:Hot topic of recent note which led to a little title change, Beto saying he's coming for the ARs and Aks... anyone find it a bit ironic that the person with a burglary charge is also the one wanting to get rid of the means of defending oneself and one's property?
by The Two Jerseys » Mon Sep 16, 2019 5:07 pm
US-SSR wrote:But why is it when I read the old thread title I think of this...
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cerespasia, Cerula, Cyptopir, Elejamie, Google [Bot]
Advertisement