2019-2020 US Election Megathread III: Biden VS Biden

[Galloism]

Also true, as does murder, breathing, eating plants, and arguing about how things should be handled.

But in point of fact, the objection that guns are, historical terms, modern, so aren’t rights doesn’t make any sense. Arms go back as far as humans.

The whole "When the constitution was written" thing is the worst brand of that TBH.

I mean, what? You really want people to shoot up a school with a fucking carronade?

It doesn’t even make sense.

We got the right to bear arms from the English, who not only had a right to bear arms but a requirement to have them under the Assize of Arms (1181), who themselves got it from the Germanic tribes, for whom we have documentation of this right and duty dating at least as far back as 690.

[Greater Miami Shores and La Habana Cuba]

I know a chimp or two that can meet that criteria.

My two dogs would be better leaders.

I love dogs and respect cats. I like Trump for many obvious reasons related to my political viewpoints and my pet issue on NS, which we all know what it is, so I wont say the word.

[Bombadil]

Yes, I considered this possibility too.

I agree with someone younger but a all female ticket im not sure about. I think the party would want geographic balance which is why i think Mayor Pete would be an ideal choice.

I'm already dreading the tweets if Trump's up against a female and a gay candidate. Personally I think Beto is not a bad choice as a balanced ticket.

Frankly I'm dreading the tweets regardless.

[Gormwood]

The whole "When the constitution was written" thing is the worst brand of that TBH.

I mean, what? You really want people to shoot up a school with a fucking carronade?

It doesn’t even make sense.

We got the right to bear arms from the English, who not only had a right to bear arms but a requirement to have them under the Assize of Arms (1181), who themselves got it from the Germanic tribes, for whom we have documentation of this right and duty dating at least as far back as 690.

So what does this have to do with the 2019 primaries? Go to the Gun Show thread if you want to incessantly moon over firearms.

[Telconi]

It doesn’t even make sense.

We got the right to bear arms from the English, who not only had a right to bear arms but a requirement to have them under the Assize of Arms (1181), who themselves got it from the Germanic tribes, for whom we have documentation of this right and duty dating at least as far back as 690.

So what does this have to do with the 2019 primaries? Go to the Gun Show thread if you want to incessantly moon over firearms.

"What do political issues relevant to the selection of a president have to do with selecting a president?"

Really Gauth?

[San Lumen]

I agree with someone younger but a all female ticket im not sure about. I think the party would want geographic balance which is why i think Mayor Pete would be an ideal choice.

I'm already dreading the tweets if Trump's up against a female and a gay candidate. Personally I think Beto is not a bad choice as a balanced ticket.

Frankly I'm dreading the tweets regardless.

It could seriously backfire. He got serious blowback for the go back to to your country tweets. Attacking Mayor Pete’s sexuality would not go over well even with some Republicans. A majority of the country supports LGBT rights

[Gormwood]

I'm already dreading the tweets if Trump's up against a female and a gay candidate. Personally I think Beto is not a bad choice as a balanced ticket.

Frankly I'm dreading the tweets regardless.

It could seriously backfire. He got serious blowback for the go back to to your country tweets. Attacking Mayor Pete’s sexuality would not go over well even with some Republicans. A majority of the country supports LGBT rights

Please. Donny is a geriatric spoiled brat with a blank check. If he started making homophobic Tweets the Log Cabin Republicans would volunteer to go under the bus and put up a mild objection that people sneer at regarding the United Nations at best.

[San Lumen]

It could seriously backfire. He got serious blowback for the go back to to your country tweets. Attacking Mayor Pete’s sexuality would not go over well even with some Republicans. A majority of the country supports LGBT rights

Please. Donny is a geriatric spoiled brat with a blank check. If he started making homophobic Tweets the Log Cabin Republicans would volunteer to go under the bus and put up a mild objection that people sneer at regarding the United Nations at best.

Jared Polis had some minor stuff said about him during the campaign. Now you can call him Governor of Colorado

[Galloism]

It doesn’t even make sense.

We got the right to bear arms from the English, who not only had a right to bear arms but a requirement to have them under the Assize of Arms (1181), who themselves got it from the Germanic tribes, for whom we have documentation of this right and duty dating at least as far back as 690.

So what does this have to do with the 2019 primaries? Go to the Gun Show thread if you want to incessantly moon over firearms.

When O’Rourke says he wants to take an entire class of firearms away from us, it should be viewed no less egregiously than taking a whole class of speech - say speech online - away from us because a few people cause harm from talking on the internet.

Basically, he hates America. And England. And the Germanic tribes.

Happy?

[Bombadil]

So what does this have to do with the 2019 primaries? Go to the Gun Show thread if you want to incessantly moon over firearms.

"What do political issues relevant to the selection of a president have to do with selecting a president?"

Really Gauth?

It's moved quite far from being relevant to a basic discussion of the 2nd Amendment.. there's a thread for that.

At best for the moment Beto can run with it for headlines, personally I don't see any changes given a Republican run Senate. I don't see it making him a prime contender either.

[Gormwood]

So what does this have to do with the 2019 primaries? Go to the Gun Show thread if you want to incessantly moon over firearms.

When O’Rourke says he wants to take an entire class of firearms away from us, it should be viewed no less egregiously than taking a whole class of speech - say speech online - away from us because a few people cause harm from talking on the internet.

Basically, he hates America. And England. And the Germanic tribes.

Happy?

Go to the Gun Show already.

[Telconi]

"What do political issues relevant to the selection of a president have to do with selecting a president?"

Really Gauth?

It's moved quite far from being relevant to a basic discussion of the 2nd Amendment.. there's a thread for that.

At best for the moment Beto can run with it for headlines, personally I don't see any changes given a Republican run Senate. I don't see it making him a prime contender either.

It should land him in a fucking CIA black site, but alas, no luck with that.

[Uiiop]

It's moved quite far from being relevant to a basic discussion of the 2nd Amendment.. there's a thread for that.

At best for the moment Beto can run with it for headlines, personally I don't see any changes given a Republican run Senate. I don't see it making him a prime contender either.

It should land him in a fucking CIA black site, but alas, no luck with that.

All that can come up to reply to this is :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHC1230OpOg

[Galloism]

"What do political issues relevant to the selection of a president have to do with selecting a president?"

Really Gauth?

It's moved quite far from being relevant to a basic discussion of the 2nd Amendment.. there's a thread for that.

At best for the moment Beto can run with it for headlines, personally I don't see any changes given a Republican run Senate. I don't see it making him a prime contender either.

One of the reason I'm hopeful for Sanders. He talks about it now some during the primaries, but I don't think he really is interested in going after the guns. He comes from a notoriously gun friendly state, hasn't really taken actions against our gun rights before, and has far bigger fish to fry in his mind.

I think he might be the first candidate in a while not overtly hostile to a constitutional right.

[San Lumen]

It's moved quite far from being relevant to a basic discussion of the 2nd Amendment.. there's a thread for that.

At best for the moment Beto can run with it for headlines, personally I don't see any changes given a Republican run Senate. I don't see it making him a prime contender either.

It should land him in a fucking CIA black site, but alas, no luck with that.

We can add free speech to things your against too. Nice to know you support locking up political opponents like any good dictator

[Uiiop]

It should land him in a fucking CIA black site, but alas, no luck with that.

We can add free speech to things your against too. Nice to know you support locking up political opponents like any good dictator

CIA Black Site entails a lot more than "Locking up".

Damn talk about a self own on his part.

[Galloism]

It should land him in a fucking CIA black site, but alas, no luck with that.

We can add free speech to things your against too. Nice to know you support locking up political opponents like any good dictator

Of course Beto shouldn't be in a black site.

But if people had good feelings about their constitutional rights, his numbers should crater and he should bow out in shame. Sadly, that probably won't happen.

[San Lumen]

We can add free speech to things your against too. Nice to know you support locking up political opponents like any good dictator

Of course Beto shouldn't be in a black site.

But if people had good feelings about their constitutional rights, his numbers should crater and he should bow out in shame. Sadly, that probably won't happen.

Telconi is someone who said the peaceful transfer of power shouldn’t be respected

It is up to donors and voters to decide his fate

[Galloism]

Of course Beto shouldn't be in a black site.

But if people had good feelings about their constitutional rights, his numbers should crater and he should bow out in shame. Sadly, that probably won't happen.

Telconi is someone who said the peaceful transfer of power shouldn’t be respected

It is up to donors and voters to decide his fate

Yes. It is.

After 2016, I don't have a lot of confidence in correct decisions being made, but that is the proper way to make them.

[Bombadil]

We can add free speech to things your against too. Nice to know you support locking up political opponents like any good dictator

Of course Beto shouldn't be in a black site.

But if people had good feelings about their constitutional rights, his numbers should crater and he should bow out in shame. Sadly, that probably won't happen.

Most Americans are in favour of greater gun control, but then a great number care about climate change and so far there's been hardly any airtime at all on the subject.

I would like one candidate to tire of the same old tedious questions asked and go 'ok everyone, I'm going to ignore this question and talk about climate change'.

[Gormwood]

Of course Beto shouldn't be in a black site.

But if people had good feelings about their constitutional rights, his numbers should crater and he should bow out in shame. Sadly, that probably won't happen.

Most Americans are in favour of greater gun control, but then a great number care about climate change and so far there's been hardly any airtime at all on the subject.

I would like one candidate to tire of the same old tedious questions asked and go 'ok everyone, I'm going to ignore this question and talk about climate change'.

Jynese hoax!

[Galloism]

Of course Beto shouldn't be in a black site.

But if people had good feelings about their constitutional rights, his numbers should crater and he should bow out in shame. Sadly, that probably won't happen.

Most Americans are in favour of greater gun control, but then a great number care about climate change and so far there's been hardly any airtime at all on the subject.

Notably, what he proposed isn't gun control, any more than banning political speech online is containing extremism.

He proposed rebooting the failed AWB. Bans.

I would like one candidate to tire of the same old tedious questions asked and go 'ok everyone, I'm going to ignore this question and talk about climate change'.

That would be pretty great. Are they allowed to do that?

[Cyrothica]

Most Americans are in favour of greater gun control, but then a great number care about climate change and so far there's been hardly any airtime at all on the subject.

Notably, what he proposed isn't gun control, any more than banning political speech online is containing extremism.

He proposed rebooting the failed AWB. Bans.

I would like one candidate to tire of the same old tedious questions asked and go 'ok everyone, I'm going to ignore this question and talk about climate change'.

That would be pretty great. Are they allowed to do that?

Yes, they are. Why they don't is beyond me. With the exception of corporate greed.

[Kowani]

Most Americans are in favour of greater gun control, but then a great number care about climate change and so far there's been hardly any airtime at all on the subject.

Notably, what he proposed isn't gun control, any more than banning political speech online is containing extremism.

He proposed rebooting the failed AWB. Bans.

I would like one candidate to tire of the same old tedious questions asked and go 'ok everyone, I'm going to ignore this question and talk about climate change'.

That would be pretty great. Are they allowed to do that?

What’re they gonna do, shut off their mike?

[Galloism]

Notably, what he proposed isn't gun control, any more than banning political speech online is containing extremism.

He proposed rebooting the failed AWB. Bans.


That would be pretty great. Are they allowed to do that?

What’re they gonna do, shut off their mike?

I guess they wouldn't have the chutzpah to do that.