Novae Romae wrote:When i woke up i found myself to be removed from the discord, and found out that something had happened over night when i was sleeping. So, i essentially invited myself back into the discord to get an answer for why i was removed. It turned out that i was removed simply for another member merely mentioning my name and saying, on my behalf, whilst i was sleeping mind you, that i was going to join them in leaving. I was removed because someone else said something about me when i showed no signs of leaving in the first place. I was removed without a way to defend myself other than inviting myself back into the discord. So, needless to say this was upsetting to me, i was a loyal member of the LKE, i truly was, i had no intentions of leaving until that point. Hell, i was a member of the LKE Estates Commons, of course i had loyalty.
You were temporarily removed (kicked without a ban) by one of our Discord moderators (not one of our admins) after they came online to find massive disruption in the immediate aftermath of the incident. Simultaneously, the moderator posted "Also, to prevent anything further, Emperor Lucenius I, an associate of the offending members, has been kicked, but not banned, from the server. I thought the precaution necessary." in our moderation channel. They believed the precaution necessary as the statement by one of the perpetrators - that you would be leaving with them - implied (rightly or wrongly) that you may have known their plans in advance. The moderator's priority was to gain control of the situation and prevent further inappropriate activity.
Had I been online, I may have taken a different judgement to the moderator concerned, but their decision was not unreasonable and easily remediable.
When you returned to our server and were given an explanation and apology, you stated: "Of course. I understand why it was done, don't me wrong." So you presumably also understood why the moderator's action was a reasonable precaution given the extremity of the circumstances.
Subsequently, in line with what the perpetrators stated would happen, you very shortly after joined the three perpetrators in their region the Placeholder Land of Placeholders. You then left with them to set up New Roman Imperium. You did so in full knowledge of what they had done and its consequences.
If you ever had any "loyalty" to the LKE as you profess - or never mind loyalty, just followed ethical standards - you would not have immediately joined a group who destroyed our content and systematically replaced previous content with inappropriate content, less than a day after these acts.
Novae Romae wrote:However, in response i have already taken the following actions, I have removed all three from public office, and i shall take the world assembly delegate position by the next WA update. They will have no authority on the RMB and i am working offsite to take the appropriate actions as well. They are regretful of their actions, but actions speak louder than words and i have taken such action to give some rectification for the incident and it's victims.
You say you have "already taken the following actions" - you have done these things today, just now, after our statement.
You appointed them all to those positions and kept them there for 10 days after you knew of what they had done.
You are now clearly removing them - whether as a show or for real - only because of the public pressure, not because of the incident itself.
Novae Romae wrote:The person who said these things did not say it out of spite or transphobia, rather it was interpreted as such due a person being considerably offended by them, and thus leaving the region.
I understand you may or may not believe, i understand that, but that is the best i can provide to show what was said. I asked the person who said it to provide what he said since i can't access the actual conversation itself.
Comments made by both of the individuals concerned were subject to moderation action because they were grossly offensive and inappropriate. They also led to another member leaving (because they were offensive), but action was taken because they were offensive, not because a member left.
The comments you claim to paraphrase do not represent the range or full severity of what was said. Neither author has access to our server.