by New Bremerton » Sun Aug 25, 2019 2:19 am
by Vendellamoore » Sun Aug 25, 2019 2:23 am
by SD_Film Artists » Sun Aug 25, 2019 2:29 am
by Vendellamoore » Sun Aug 25, 2019 2:31 am
SD_Film Artists wrote:It sounds like segregation, which is often a bad thing voluntary or not. Plus it's hard to imagine someone saying- "I've realised that I'm gay, so I'll fly away now as my people need me"
by Black Moon Sodality » Sun Aug 25, 2019 2:31 am
by Pratiloma » Sun Aug 25, 2019 2:57 am
Black Moon Sodality wrote:Given that I don’t think we’d vote to let only LGBT people in I don’t know what the point is. I’d have to be the equivalent of a gay fascist wanting anethnogaystate.
I’d rather everyone just have affordable housing, universal healthcare.
by Tamgu » Sun Aug 25, 2019 4:02 am
by Dumb Ideologies » Sun Aug 25, 2019 4:03 am
by Vivolkha » Sun Aug 25, 2019 4:22 am
by Jack Thomas Lang » Sun Aug 25, 2019 4:23 am
by The New California Republic » Sun Aug 25, 2019 4:27 am
by East Ustya » Sun Aug 25, 2019 4:31 am
by The Free Joy State » Sun Aug 25, 2019 4:38 am
The New California Republic wrote:It won't work, partially because there will be a fundamental disconnect between the populace/nation and their offspring in terms of identity, but also because there will be issues of where the nation would be, as it'd need to be somewhere that has enough resources and infrastructure to be able to sustain a nation. It'd need to be ceded from another nation and the populace displaced. The only other alternative is to find an unpopulated area and use that; but the issue with that is that such areas are usually unpopulated for a reason, for example they are too inhospitable or do not have the resources to make it economically viable.
by Vivolkha » Sun Aug 25, 2019 4:42 am
The Free Joy State wrote:The New California Republic wrote:It won't work, partially because there will be a fundamental disconnect between the populace/nation and their offspring in terms of identity, but also because there will be issues of where the nation would be, as it'd need to be somewhere that has enough resources and infrastructure to be able to sustain a nation. It'd need to be ceded from another nation and the populace displaced. The only other alternative is to find an unpopulated area and use that; but the issue with that is that such areas are usually unpopulated for a reason, for example they are too inhospitable or do not have the resources to make it economically viable.
Impractical for all of these reasons.
It would be far better to use democratic means to pressure governments to pass laws preventing discrimination on the grounds of sexuality (also: race, gender, age, disabilty etc) and then enforce those laws properly in as many nations as humanly possible.
by The Free Joy State » Sun Aug 25, 2019 4:46 am
Vivolkha wrote:The Free Joy State wrote:Impractical for all of these reasons.
It would be far better to use democratic means to pressure governments to pass laws preventing discrimination on the grounds of sexuality (also: race, gender, age, disabilty etc) and then enforce those laws properly in as many nations as humanly possible.
(emphasis mine)
That means all of them.
by Vaukiai » Sun Aug 25, 2019 4:56 am
by The New California Republic » Sun Aug 25, 2019 5:02 am
Vaukiai wrote:Great. I'll wait for a generation and then make sure to tell my children about a LGBT nation-state. We go there and count how many individuals we see, and how much they reproduce.
Hahahahahahahh
by Vaukiai » Sun Aug 25, 2019 5:07 am
The New California Republic wrote:Vaukiai wrote:Great. I'll wait for a generation and then make sure to tell my children about a LGBT nation-state. We go there and count how many individuals we see, and how much they reproduce.
Hahahahahahahh
The OP mentions artificial means of reproduction, and there would be a constant stream of LGBT people from other nations, so your joke falls flat in light of that. Methinks you haven't thought this through...
by SD_Film Artists » Sun Aug 25, 2019 5:08 am
The New California Republic wrote:It won't work, partially because there will be a fundamental disconnect between the populace/nation and their offspring in terms of identity
by The New California Republic » Sun Aug 25, 2019 5:09 am
Vaukiai wrote:The New California Republic wrote:The OP mentions artificial means of reproduction, and there would be a constant stream of LGBT people from other nations, so your joke falls flat in light of that. Methinks you haven't thought this through...
Then do you mean children with three eyes, two heads and six fingers?
by The World Capitalist Confederation » Sun Aug 25, 2019 5:10 am
by Vaukiai » Sun Aug 25, 2019 5:11 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Hidrandia, Philjia, Quincy, Spirit of Hope
Advertisement