NATION

PASSWORD

Should everyone have a right to express their own opinion?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Bluelight-R006
Senator
 
Posts: 4317
Founded: Mar 31, 2017
Civil Rights Lovefest

Should everyone have a right to express their own opinion?

Postby Bluelight-R006 » Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:51 am

I saw this reply by a person to a comment that shared his/her experience of facing the ‘odd’ death of a close one. The person who replied thought it was quite funny—the ‘odd’ manner in which the close one of the commenter has died—that (s)he decided to fight off anyone who disagreed with him/her strongly, which obviously there were many who were quite upset.

The person who replied stated, “I have a right to express my opinion, don’t I?” This got me thinking, do we [have a right to express our opinion if it hurts others]? If we upset other people by saying something ‘extremely offensive’ to a person or a group, do we have a right to express our opinion?

I feel that if a certain statement has the potential of hurting some people deeply, then it’s better to withhold that opinion from the public rather than express it. We have the rights to hold our own opinion, and maybe even asserverate it, but not go and force it or ‘attack’ others with it. It’s probably not best if we continue to defend that statement, as we may hurt others with our ignorance.

Then again, if someone asks for people’s opinions on the matter, then they should probably get what they’re asking for—the opinions they seek to hear no matter how wrong they may be.

It’s a mixed up thinking from me, and I can’t weight it out properly, so I’d like to hear some solid opinions from the NSG community.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73175
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:54 am

The person who replied stated, “I have a right to express my opinion, don’t I?” This got me thinking, do we [have a right to express our opinion if it hurts others]? If we upset other people by saying something ‘extremely offensive’ to a person or a group, do we have a right to express our opinion?

I feel that if a certain statement has the potential of hurting some people deeply, then it’s better to withhold that opinion from the public rather than express it. We have the rights to hold our own opinion, and maybe even asserverate it, but not go and force it or ‘attack’ others with it. It’s probably not best if we continue to defend that statement, as we may hurt others with our ignorance.


This opinion is deeply offensive and hurts me, due to the assailment of my deeply held beliefs surrounding liberal philosophy.
Last edited by Galloism on Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4364
Founded: Apr 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:57 am

Was this online or in person? Because I think the Darwin Awards' very existence is a counterbalance to the irrational hypersensitivity people have around deaths. People have for so long been walking on eggshells around death that it's cathartic to be deliberately insensitive about it without consequence, and as a result some people wind up taking it too far. Never treat the Internet as a representative sample.

Anyway, it obviously depends on the opinion; if it's something like "[insert supposed victim here] should be killed" then it's on the borderline between expressing opinions and uttering threats. If it's something merely insensitive it should be protected; the fact that people have such an emotional reaction to it, if anything, makes it all the more important to protect it, so that those offended can make the case for whether or not their reaction is more justified than that which they're reacting to.
Last edited by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha on Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.

How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

User avatar
Andsed
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13443
Founded: Aug 24, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Andsed » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:05 am

People should have the right to express their opinion no matter how screwed up as long as they are not breaking any other laws. But that does not mean they cannot be called out on their bullshit and saying you have a right to express your opinion is not an excuse for being a dick.
Last edited by Andsed on Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:06 am, edited 2 times in total.
I do be tired


LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
An Alan Smithee Nation
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7623
Founded: Apr 18, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby An Alan Smithee Nation » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:06 am

Having a right to express your opinion and exercising it are two different things. As a rule of thumb I would suggest only upsetting other people when you have a reason to do so, not just for the sake of expressing yourself.
Everything is intertwinkled

User avatar
The South Falls
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13353
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The South Falls » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:07 am

While it is callous, he has every right to undertake that endeavor. However, it is not by any means, an expedient maneuver for maintaining civility.
This is an MT nation that reflects some of my beliefs, trade deals and debate always welcome! Call me TeaSF. A level 8, according to This Index.


Political Compass Results:

Economic: -5.5
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51
I make dumb jokes. I'm really serious about that.

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45968
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:08 am

No, that's how you get Twitter.
Are these "human rights" in the room with us right now?
★彡 Professional pessimist. Reactionary socialist and gamer liberationist. Coffee addict. Fun at parties 彡★
Freedom is when people agree with you, and the more people you can force to act like they agree the freer society is
You are the trolley problem's conductor. You could stop the train in time but you do not. Nobody knows you're part of the equation. You satisfy your bloodlust and get away with it every time

User avatar
Bluelight-R006
Senator
 
Posts: 4317
Founded: Mar 31, 2017
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bluelight-R006 » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:08 am

An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:Having a right to express your opinion and exercising it are two different things. As a rule of thumb I would suggest only upsetting other people when you have a reason to do so, not just for the sake of expressing yourself.

Wanted to point this out earlier—I feel as if, that you could express yourself but not defend yourself so far, so thoroughly as to upset more along the way. A waste of time and emotion. So much so it’d be better to avoid the entire ordeal.
Last edited by Bluelight-R006 on Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Fourth Philippines
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Aug 22, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Fourth Philippines » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:11 am

Bluelight-R006 wrote:I saw this reply by a person to a comment that shared his/her experience of facing the ‘odd’ death of a close one. The person who replied thought it was quite funny—the ‘odd’ manner in which the close one of the commenter has died—that (s)he decided to fight off anyone who disagreed with him/her strongly, which obviously there were many who were quite upset.

The person who replied stated, “I have a right to express my opinion, don’t I?” This got me thinking, do we [have a right to express our opinion if it hurts others]? If we upset other people by saying something ‘extremely offensive’ to a person or a group, do we have a right to express our opinion?

I feel that if a certain statement has the potential of hurting some people deeply, then it’s better to withhold that opinion from the public rather than express it. We have the rights to hold our own opinion, and maybe even asserverate it, but not go and force it or ‘attack’ others with it. It’s probably not best if we continue to defend that statement, as we may hurt others with our ignorance.

Then again, if someone asks for people’s opinions on the matter, then they should probably get what they’re asking for—the opinions they seek to hear no matter how wrong they may be.

It’s a mixed up thinking from me, and I can’t weight it out properly, so I’d like to hear some solid opinions from the NSG community.


Yes, we do. Fuck censorship.

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:17 am

Bluelight-R006 wrote:I saw this reply by a person to a comment that shared his/her experience of facing the ‘odd’ death of a close one. The person who replied thought it was quite funny—the ‘odd’ manner in which the close one of the commenter has died—that (s)he decided to fight off anyone who disagreed with him/her strongly, which obviously there were many who were quite upset.

There can be limits. If someone came into the church during the funeral and started insulting and mocking the deceased and laughing at the grief of the mourners, then I'm sure plenty of folk would say that really isn't acceptable.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Teachian
Envoy
 
Posts: 280
Founded: Sep 23, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Teachian » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:20 am

Everyone has the right to an opinion, and a chance to express said opinion.

Some people just seem to overvalue how important their opinion is, or think people aren’t allowed to have a negative opinion of their opinion. Which is strange, since “hey, not cool” would equally be protected by “that’s just my opinion”. But that’s just my opinion.
Was looking for the washroom, somehow became president

User avatar
Andsed
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13443
Founded: Aug 24, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Andsed » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:22 am

The New California Republic wrote:
Bluelight-R006 wrote:I saw this reply by a person to a comment that shared his/her experience of facing the ‘odd’ death of a close one. The person who replied thought it was quite funny—the ‘odd’ manner in which the close one of the commenter has died—that (s)he decided to fight off anyone who disagreed with him/her strongly, which obviously there were many who were quite upset.

There can be limits. If someone came into the church during the funeral and started insulting and mocking the deceased and laughing at the grief of the mourners, then I'm sure plenty of folk would say that really isn't acceptable.

Also that would probably fall under making a public disturbance with I believe (I am in no way a lawyer so please correct me if I am wrong) is a criminal offense and thus police would probably get involved.
I do be tired


LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73175
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:23 am

Andsed wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:There can be limits. If someone came into the church during the funeral and started insulting and mocking the deceased and laughing at the grief of the mourners, then I'm sure plenty of folk would say that really isn't acceptable.

Also that would probably fall under making a public disturbance with I believe (I am in no way a lawyer so please correct me if I am wrong) is a criminal offense and thus police would probably get involved.

More likely since a church is private property, the duly empowered representative of the church would revoke your invitation - meaning you could leave or be arrested for trespassing.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
The British American Colonies
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 163
Founded: Nov 23, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The British American Colonies » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:24 am

I believe everyone, no matter how offensive their opinion may be, should be able to state their opinion. Period. Yes, even holocaust deniers, anti semites. That doesn’t mean I agree with them, not in the slightest, I just believe in free speech.
The Beatles, The Who, Yes, Pink Floyd, and RUSH.
Victoria 2, Hoi4, CK2, Stellaris

User avatar
The Sherpa Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 3222
Founded: Jan 15, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Sherpa Empire » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:27 am

An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:Having a right to express your opinion and exercising it are two different things. As a rule of thumb I would suggest only upsetting other people when you have a reason to do so, not just for the sake of expressing yourself.


^This.

Just because you have a right to do something doesn't mean it's not rude.
༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།
Following new legislation in The Sherpa Empire, life is short but human kindness is endless.
Alternate IC names: Sherpaland, Pharak

User avatar
Republican President Donald J Trump USA
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 144
Founded: Aug 09, 2019
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Republican President Donald J Trump USA » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:50 am

Should everyone have a right to express their own opinion ?

While many say bad things on NS and the Mods thank them for reporting it and they punish them, I will never take a fellow nation before the Mod Gods and our Almighty Goddess Violet for any reasons even if it is a negative statement against me.

Without mentioning names, How dare I try to get a fellow nation's General or RP thread locked, it feels spammy, it feels bloggy, as it has happed to me a few times, then after they lost the case they had the nerve to come on my thread they did not like and try to get locked for whatever reasons and post their views, lol that was a classic but I hold no grudges.

How dare I tell a fellow nation what to post, what not to post and how to post it especially on their own threads, like was done to me, on my anti Cuban government thread for obvious reasons my pet issue on NS, a few fellow nations demanded I change my posts and links, when I politely refused they posted back we fixed your post for you and now it is correct, and reported me as the bad guy for anything they could think of, used the F word against me and all Cubans, lol that was a classic, they are still on NS the last time I checked but I hold no grudges.

It makes me sick to see us reporting each other for anything we can think of, especially when the Mods say to them, not actionable, I don't see anything actionable, and many of them have very dirty records.

I respect everyone's right to their views and their rights to post them, I for one will never take a fellow nation before the Mod Gods and our Almighty Goddess Violet for any reasons, even if it is a negative statement against me, it is on my sigs.

I have a clean record that I am very proud of and wish to keep clean.
Last edited by Republican President Donald J Trump USA on Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Make America Great Again - Republican President Donald J Trump of the USA- America First, USA USA USA, Make America Great Again, with Pride and Honor, and Republican President Ronald Reagan, the original Make America Great President of the USA, with Pride and Honor. For the 2 Greatest American Presidents ever of the USA, with Pride and Honor.

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:53 am

Republican President Donald J Trump USA wrote:
Should everyone have a right to express their own opinion ?

While many say bad things on NS and the Mods thank them for reporting it and they punish them, I will never take a fellow nation before the Mod Gods and our Almighty Goddess Violet for any reasons even if it is a negative statement against me.

Without mentioning names, How dare I try to get a fellow nation's General or RP thread locked, it feels spammy, it feels bloggy, as it has happed to me a few times, then after they lost the case they had the nerve to come on my thread they did not like and try to get locked for whatever reasons and post their views, lol that was a classic but I hold no grudges.

How dare I tell a fellow nation what to post, what not to post and how to post it especially on their own threads, like was done to me, on my anti Cuban government thread for obvious reasons my pet issue on NS, a few fellow nations demanded I change my posts and links, when I politely refused they posted back we fixed your post for you and now it is correct, and reported me as the bad guy for anything they could think of, lol that was a classic, they are still on NS the last time I checked but I hold no grudges.

It makes me sick to see us reporting each other for anything we can think of, especially when the Mods say to them, not actionable, I don't see anything actionable, and many of them have very dirty records.

I respect everyone's right to their views and their rights to post them, I for one will never take a fellow nation before the Mod Gods and our Almighty Goddess Violet for any reasons, even if it is a negative statement against me, it is on my sigs.

I have a clean record that I am very proud of and wish to keep clean.

https://www.nationstates.net/page=faq#etiquette
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Antityranicals
Minister
 
Posts: 2470
Founded: May 18, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Antityranicals » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:55 am

Without a doubt, and with no exception, everyone should have a right to express their own opinion, no matter how evil, and also, without a doubt and with no exception, everyone should have a right to call out and denounce anyone's opinion. People do not have rights to "unhurt feelings", or "safe spaces", unless they want to buy their own soundproof room, and go sit alone in it.
Compass: Right: 9.94, Libertarian: -5.84
Catholic Libertarian. Gov't has no authority, all authority is from God. God grants us free will, gov't should not infringe upon it. Legislating morality is wrong. Only exception is protecting rights to life, liberty, and property. Abortion is killing an infant, one of the few things gov't should prevent. Pro-Trump, he's been an effective weapon against real enemies of freedom: The Left, but I wish he were more for free trade, more against deficits. Unrestrained capitalism is a great thing; it does wonders for standards of living of everyone, especially the poor.
HS student in the USA. Male. XC runner, 17:30 5k, 4:59 mile. I enjoy singing, sushi, eating large quantities of food, and eating large quantities of sushi.

User avatar
Pacomia
Senator
 
Posts: 4811
Founded: May 23, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Pacomia » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:56 am

Everyone has the right to express their opinion, but less so to carry it out.

Example: If you believe we should kill all the Jews, you have the right to express that opinion. You don’t have the right to kill Jews.
This nation is based on (a slightly more extreme version of) my IRL opinions, and I answer issues accordingly.
Current accidental policies: No Sex
Results of political various tests I took meme awesome
Progressive capitalism gang

GLORY TO CASCADIA, NUCLEAR ENERGY IS A GOOD THING!
This user is a male.

User avatar
Republican President Donald J Trump USA
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 144
Founded: Aug 09, 2019
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Republican President Donald J Trump USA » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:58 am

The New California Republic wrote:
Republican President Donald J Trump USA wrote:
Should everyone have a right to express their own opinion ?

While many say bad things on NS and the Mods thank them for reporting it and they punish them, I will never take a fellow nation before the Mod Gods and our Almighty Goddess Violet for any reasons even if it is a negative statement against me.

Without mentioning names, How dare I try to get a fellow nation's General or RP thread locked, it feels spammy, it feels bloggy, as it has happed to me a few times, then after they lost the case they had the nerve to come on my thread they did not like and try to get locked for whatever reasons and post their views, lol that was a classic but I hold no grudges.

How dare I tell a fellow nation what to post, what not to post and how to post it especially on their own threads, like was done to me, on my anti Cuban government thread for obvious reasons my pet issue on NS, a few fellow nations demanded I change my posts and links, when I politely refused they posted back we fixed your post for you and now it is correct, and reported me as the bad guy for anything they could think of, lol that was a classic, they are still on NS the last time I checked but I hold no grudges.

It makes me sick to see us reporting each other for anything we can think of, especially when the Mods say to them, not actionable, I don't see anything actionable, and many of them have very dirty records.

I respect everyone's right to their views and their rights to post them, I for one will never take a fellow nation before the Mod Gods and our Almighty Goddess Violet for any reasons, even if it is a negative statement against me, it is on my sigs.

I have a clean record that I am very proud of and wish to keep clean.

https://www.nationstates.net/page=faq#etiquette

To the New California Republic, Thank you for the Link, I know the rules, that is not my point as my post clearly states.
Make America Great Again - Republican President Donald J Trump of the USA- America First, USA USA USA, Make America Great Again, with Pride and Honor, and Republican President Ronald Reagan, the original Make America Great President of the USA, with Pride and Honor. For the 2 Greatest American Presidents ever of the USA, with Pride and Honor.

User avatar
Rost Dreadnorramus
Envoy
 
Posts: 328
Founded: Aug 28, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Rost Dreadnorramus » Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:02 am

Bluelight-R006 wrote:I saw this reply by a person to a comment that shared his/her experience of facing the ‘odd’ death of a close one. The person who replied thought it was quite funny—the ‘odd’ manner in which the close one of the commenter has died—that (s)he decided to fight off anyone who disagreed with him/her strongly, which obviously there were many who were quite upset.

The person who replied stated, “I have a right to express my opinion, don’t I?” This got me thinking, do we [have a right to express our opinion if it hurts others]? If we upset other people by saying something ‘extremely offensive’ to a person or a group, do we have a right to express our opinion?

I feel that if a certain statement has the potential of hurting some people deeply, then it’s better to withhold that opinion from the public rather than express it. We have the rights to hold our own opinion, and maybe even asserverate it, but not go and force it or ‘attack’ others with it. It’s probably not best if we continue to defend that statement, as we may hurt others with our ignorance.

Then again, if someone asks for people’s opinions on the matter, then they should probably get what they’re asking for—the opinions they seek to hear no matter how wrong they may be.

It’s a mixed up thinking from me, and I can’t weight it out properly, so I’d like to hear some solid opinions from the NSG community.

Based off the title, yes.
0=={]=====>

User avatar
Vivolkha
Diplomat
 
Posts: 836
Founded: Oct 15, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vivolkha » Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:02 am

Quoting from this article: https://freedomhouse.org/blog/terrorism ... sion-spain
The fact that something may be offensive should not be used as an excuse to ban it, as the most powerful elements of the state and society typically decide what constitutes offensive speech under such laws, and repressive regimes around the world have abused this power to silence their critics, persecute vulnerable minorities, and maintain their own positions. If any group can block speech they disagree with, democratic debate and diversity of thought become impossible.


"Safe spaces", "hate speech" laws and so on make no sense and are a threat to freedom of speech and to quality democracy.
Exclusively OOC nation | Prominent stat player as Aryax | Слава Україні! Героям слава!
Commentary about WA resolutions is posted on a personal capacity, and does not represent the opinion of 10000 Islands.

User avatar
Antityranicals
Minister
 
Posts: 2470
Founded: May 18, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Antityranicals » Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:03 am

Vivolkha wrote:Quoting from this article: https://freedomhouse.org/blog/terrorism ... sion-spain
The fact that something may be offensive should not be used as an excuse to ban it, as the most powerful elements of the state and society typically decide what constitutes offensive speech under such laws, and repressive regimes around the world have abused this power to silence their critics, persecute vulnerable minorities, and maintain their own positions. If any group can block speech they disagree with, democratic debate and diversity of thought become impossible.


"Safe spaces", "hate speech" laws and so on make no sense and are a threat to freedom of speech and to quality democracy.

I agree. Eventually "hate speech" will always be defined as "whatever authority disagrees with".
Compass: Right: 9.94, Libertarian: -5.84
Catholic Libertarian. Gov't has no authority, all authority is from God. God grants us free will, gov't should not infringe upon it. Legislating morality is wrong. Only exception is protecting rights to life, liberty, and property. Abortion is killing an infant, one of the few things gov't should prevent. Pro-Trump, he's been an effective weapon against real enemies of freedom: The Left, but I wish he were more for free trade, more against deficits. Unrestrained capitalism is a great thing; it does wonders for standards of living of everyone, especially the poor.
HS student in the USA. Male. XC runner, 17:30 5k, 4:59 mile. I enjoy singing, sushi, eating large quantities of food, and eating large quantities of sushi.

User avatar
Ginicun
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 100
Founded: Jan 23, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Ginicun » Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:15 am

Is that even a question? Yes, everybody should have a right to express their own opinion.
proud agender gay person. biologically male. they/them is preferred, or he/him if it makes your life easier, though i can get really mad over that.

i'm also a music fan, mainly into progressive/Avant/experimental type stuff.
right-libertarian bordering ancap whos into anarcho-individualism and free-market socialism.

User avatar
Valentine Z
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13005
Founded: Nov 08, 2015
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Valentine Z » Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:16 am

I personally believe that the freedom of expression should be there, but like others have said, it's not a surprise if something you said have offended someone somewhere in the future.

With that said, most of the opinions can also be said without the negative connotations, or sounding outright rude. Like, "exterminating a X race" is something that can't be spin in any way to make it inoffensive, but there's a difference between "You're a dumbass for thinking that way" versus "I personally disagree with your views...." Always be nice to whoever you are talking to, even if it is easier said than done at times.
Last edited by Valentine Z on Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:17 am, edited 2 times in total.
Val's Stuff. ♡ ^_^ ♡ For You
If you are reading my sig, I want you to have the best day ever ! You are worth it, do not let anyone get you down !
Glory to De Geweldige Sierlijke Katachtige Utopia en Zijne Autonome Machten ov Valentine Z !
(✿◠‿◠) ☆ \(^_^)/ ☆

Issues Thread Photography Stuff Project: Save F7. Stats Analysis

The Sixty! Valentian Stories! Gwen's Adventures!

• Never trouble trouble until trouble troubles you.
• World Map is a cat playing with Australia.
Let Fate sort it out.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Corrian, Google [Bot], Herador, Indian Empire, Magnoliids, Shrillland, Tillania

Advertisement

Remove ads