NATION

PASSWORD

Google discourages politics in the workplace

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Aureumterra
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8521
Founded: Oct 25, 2017
Ex-Nation

Google discourages politics in the workplace

Postby Aureumterra » Sat Aug 24, 2019 4:53 am

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.c ... lists.html

Google on Friday released a new set of community guidelines that are meant to crack down on what employees can say inside the company.
Employees are now barred from making statements that "insult, demean, or humiliate" other employees, the company's extended workforce, business partners or others. The rules also discourage Google employees from engaging in a "raging debate over politics or the latest news story" and to avoid conversations that are generally disruptive.
"Our primarily responsibility is to do the work we've each been hired to do, not to spend working time on debates about non-work topics," the policy states. The rules explicitly discourage workers from talking about politics on Google's internal mailing lists and forums.
"Community guidelines exist to support the healthy and open discussion that has always been a part of our culture. They help create an environment where we can come together as a community in pursuit of our shared mission and serve our users," a Google spokesperson said in a statement.
"Working at Google comes with tremendous responsibility. Billions of people rely on us every day for high-quality, reliable information. It's critical that we honor that trust and uphold the integrity of our products and services. The guidelines are official policy and apply when employees are communicating in the workplace."
As part of the move, Google is also making changes to how it moderates discourse and enforces the new community guidelines on internal forums and mailing lists.
It's rolling out a "central flagging tool" that lets employees report content that may violate Google's rules and putting in place a new team of community managers that can review those flagged posts, a Google spokesperson said. Moderators will first try to educate employees on why they may have violated the rules, but can also enforce disciplinary actions where they see fit.
The new policies are a stark diversion from the internal culture Google has become known for. The company has traditionally fostered a culture of free speech and debate inside the company, with employees often getting into heated conversations about political and social issues.
This has led to extensive turmoil inside the company over what the limits of employee free speech should be. Many current and former Google employees have spoken out publicly about the issue.
Earlier this month, former Google engineer Kevin Cernekee claimed he was fired for being an outspoken conservative and alleged that Google fosters a culture of politically biased bullying. In 2017, James Damore, a former Google engineer, also claimed the company discriminated against him and others for having conservative views.
Last year, a group of liberal employees organized walkout protests for policies against sexual harassment. One of the employees who led the movement and later left the company alleged continued retaliation from Google's top brass.
Google has also faced heightened scrutiny from President Donald Trump and some Republican lawmakers who have accused the company of anti-conservative bias.
Another section of the guidelines encourages Google employees to be careful when discussing company activities publicly, instructing workers to not make false or misleading statements about Google products or businesses that could "undermine trust" in the company.


So Google finally implemented new guidelines limiting politics from the workplace. What does NSG think of this?

I’m happy Google is finally taking action on its political problem instead of remaining in a state of denial, and hopefully this will be one of the first steps to solving the bias problem in the company. This is coming a week or so following the release of the Project Veritas video and a subsequent PragerU video on the topic of political bias.
NS Parliament: Aditya Sriraam - Unity and Consolidation Party
Latin American Political RP
RightValues
Icelandic Civic Nationalist and proud
I’m your average Íslandic NS player
I DO NOT USE NS STATS!
A 12 civilization, according to this index.
Scary Right Wing Capitalist who thinks the current state of the world (before the pandemic) is the best it had been

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Sat Aug 24, 2019 5:02 am

It just means that the political crisis is spreading yet to another institution (Google) and that they decided to resort to heavy headed measures to keep it out of their pretenses. Whether or not this works out remains yet to be seen.

Given that they had to take those measures in the first place isn't a good sign however. Also it shows that their Corporate identity isnt strong or independent enough (anymore?) to avoid getting drawn into this conflict.
Last edited by Nakena on Sat Aug 24, 2019 5:05 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163852
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sat Aug 24, 2019 5:17 am

Not particularly shocking that Google would prefer to have teams of drones working for them, not people.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26052
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Sat Aug 24, 2019 5:26 am

Ifreann wrote:Not particularly shocking that Google would prefer to have teams of drones working for them, not people.


Well here's some context as to the previous state of Google:

https://www.wired.com/story/inside-goog ... pany-tech/
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 129505
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:03 am

The company's vaunted freedom and conversation dies when its dirty laundry is aired and it costs them money. Quelle suprise
https://www.hvst.com/posts/the-clash-of ... s-wl2TQBpY

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
--S. Huntington

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 

--H. Kissenger

User avatar
Juristonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6435
Founded: Oct 30, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Juristonia » Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:08 am

This is coming a week or so following the release of the Project Veritas video and a subsequent PragerU video on the topic of political bias.


> Project Veritas
> Prager U
> Political bias

Fucking lol.

If there's anyone that should wonder whether or not they might be a wee bit biased.
From the river to the sea

Liriena wrote:Say what you will about fascists: they are remarkably consistent even after several decades of failing spectacularly elsewhere.

Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.

Cannot think of a name wrote:Anyway, I'm from gold country, we grow up knowing that when people jump up and down shouting "GOLD GOLD GOLD" the gold is gone and the only money to be made is in selling shovels.

And it seems to me that cryptocurrency and NFTs and such suddenly have a whooooole lot of shovel salespeople.

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:12 am

Allanea wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Not particularly shocking that Google would prefer to have teams of drones working for them, not people.


Well here's some context as to the previous state of Google:

https://www.wired.com/story/inside-goog ... pany-tech/


Thanks that was an very interesting article.

Actually it makes their new policy entirely understandable. Seems like their corporate cohesion totally broke down in the past years. Also really, really poor management.
Last edited by Nakena on Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:28 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
The Two Jerseys
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20971
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Two Jerseys » Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:13 am

Aureumterra wrote:https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/08/23/google-bans-political-discussion-on-internal-mailing-lists.html

Google on Friday released a new set of community guidelines that are meant to crack down on what employees can say inside the company.
Employees are now barred from making statements that "insult, demean, or humiliate" other employees, the company's extended workforce, business partners or others.

You meant to tell me that Google didn't have a "don't verbally abuse your coworkers" policy until now?

As for the rest of it, it sounds like the problem is less political conversations themselves and more ineffective supervisors not managing their subordinates properly.
"The Duke of Texas" is too formal for regular use. Just call me "Your Grace".
"If I would like to watch goodness, sanity, God and logic being fucked I would watch Japanese porn." -Nightkill the Emperor
"This thread makes me wish I was a moron so that I wouldn't have to comprehend how stupid the topic is." -The Empire of Pretantia
Head of State: HM King Louis
Head of Government: The Rt. Hon. James O'Dell MP, Prime Minister
Ambassador to the World Assembly: HE Sir John Ross "J.R." Ewing II, Bt.
Join Excalibur Squadron. We're Commandos who fly Spitfires. Chicks dig Commandos who fly Spitfires.

User avatar
The South Falls
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13353
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The South Falls » Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:13 am

Well yea, google doesn't like it when workers have complaints relating to their company/business partners, and will file them under insult/humiliate/demean

but don't go off on your coworkers, like really.
Last edited by The South Falls on Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
This is an MT nation that reflects some of my beliefs, trade deals and debate always welcome! Call me TeaSF. A level 8, according to This Index.


Political Compass Results:

Economic: -5.5
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51
I make dumb jokes. I'm really serious about that.

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:29 am

The Two Jerseys wrote:
Aureumterra wrote:https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/08/23/google-bans-political-discussion-on-internal-mailing-lists.html


You meant to tell me that Google didn't have a "don't verbally abuse your coworkers" policy until now?

As for the rest of it, it sounds like the problem is less political conversations themselves and more ineffective supervisors not managing their subordinates properly.


Read the wired article. What happened is that their internal structures imploded and the management had an exceedingly poor crisis management. Also they let too much outside drama flow into their own house.

User avatar
Vallermoore
Senator
 
Posts: 4790
Founded: Mar 27, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Vallermoore » Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:41 am

Maybe the workers should go on a one day strike and see how well Google does without them. On the other hand, if politics is causing serious trouble for Google, I suppose they have to do something about it.

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:47 am

Vallermoore wrote:Maybe the workers should go on a one day strike and see how well Google does without them. On the other hand, if politics is causing serious trouble for Google, I suppose they have to do something about it.


It absolutly does. It is damaging their internal corporate cohesion, which is made a dozen times worse by management having been poorly handled the rising tensions to begin with until they escalated to a point where damage has been done to irreparable extends.

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11859
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Capitalizt

Postby The Liberated Territories » Sat Aug 24, 2019 7:48 am

Probably for the best tbh
Left Wing Market Anarchism

Yes, I am back(ish)

User avatar
95X
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1418
Founded: Sep 30, 2004
Ex-Nation

Re: Google discourages politics in the workplace

Postby 95X » Sat Aug 24, 2019 8:31 am

Rather than clicking a Google link, I went to CNBC's website directly. Here's the direct link: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/23/google-bans-political-discussion-on-internal-mailing-lists.html

The article makes it clear this is company policy for employees communicating with other employees on official channels. There's nothing wrong with a corporation saying 'if you want to talk about politics, where you work isn't the place to do it.'

Those of us who have worked in an office environment understand this, you're assigned a workspace and expected to work.

Suppose the person assigned to the desk next to you makes comments that make you feel unwelcome or otherwise makes it difficult for you to do your job. Or, suppose someone is forwarding chain messages, pictures, etc., that make you feel unwelcome and makes it diffucult for you to do your job on an internal messaging system you must use to perform your job.

So, the company is losing out in three ways: the person making the comments should instead be working, the person affected by the comments should be working, and the company is spending additional money having their bandwidth, electricity, and server disk space wasted in the transmission of the non-work-related content.

Saying 'let's not do this while we're supposed to be working' therefore implies higher workplace output and happier employees.
Nation not my RL views, etc.
Poe's Law. Nonpartisan.
Is it sad that some I learned AO4LIFE from are no longer in Atlantian Oceania?
“An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a very narrow field.”—Niels Bohr
‘Everyone makes mistakes, that's why they put erasers at the end of pencils.’—Bob Monkhouse paraphrase
“If you want to read books, read books.”—Dennis James
AOCAF 22 & 47 Champions! • Volleyball World Expo 1, 2, 4, 7 & 9 Champions!

User avatar
Aureumterra
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8521
Founded: Oct 25, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Aureumterra » Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:13 am

95X wrote:Rather than clicking a Google link, I went to CNBC's website directly. Here's the direct link: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/23/google-bans-political-discussion-on-internal-mailing-lists.html

The article makes it clear this is company policy for employees communicating with other employees on official channels. There's nothing wrong with a corporation saying 'if you want to talk about politics, where you work isn't the place to do it.'

Those of us who have worked in an office environment understand this, you're assigned a workspace and expected to work.

Suppose the person assigned to the desk next to you makes comments that make you feel unwelcome or otherwise makes it difficult for you to do your job. Or, suppose someone is forwarding chain messages, pictures, etc., that make you feel unwelcome and makes it diffucult for you to do your job on an internal messaging system you must use to perform your job.

So, the company is losing out in three ways: the person making the comments should instead be working, the person affected by the comments should be working, and the company is spending additional money having their bandwidth, electricity, and server disk space wasted in the transmission of the non-work-related content.

Saying 'let's not do this while we're supposed to be working' therefore implies higher workplace output and happier employees.

It’s the same exact article
NS Parliament: Aditya Sriraam - Unity and Consolidation Party
Latin American Political RP
RightValues
Icelandic Civic Nationalist and proud
I’m your average Íslandic NS player
I DO NOT USE NS STATS!
A 12 civilization, according to this index.
Scary Right Wing Capitalist who thinks the current state of the world (before the pandemic) is the best it had been

User avatar
Aclion
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6249
Founded: Apr 12, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Aclion » Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:16 am

I think google is tired of their political bias being leaked to the press thanks to loose lipped employees.
A popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps both. - James Madison.

User avatar
Aureumterra
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8521
Founded: Oct 25, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Aureumterra » Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:16 am

Ifreann wrote:Not particularly shocking that Google would prefer to have teams of drones working for them, not people.

Are you mad google is taking steps to keep politics out of the workplace?
NS Parliament: Aditya Sriraam - Unity and Consolidation Party
Latin American Political RP
RightValues
Icelandic Civic Nationalist and proud
I’m your average Íslandic NS player
I DO NOT USE NS STATS!
A 12 civilization, according to this index.
Scary Right Wing Capitalist who thinks the current state of the world (before the pandemic) is the best it had been

User avatar
-Ocelot-
Minister
 
Posts: 2260
Founded: Jun 14, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby -Ocelot- » Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:23 am

Juristonia wrote:
This is coming a week or so following the release of the Project Veritas video and a subsequent PragerU video on the topic of political bias.


> Project Veritas
> Prager U
> Political bias

Fucking lol.

If there's anyone that should wonder whether or not they might be a wee bit biased.


Veritas videos are fake and PragerU is basically political crusading powered by Youtube. I doubt Google made changes within because of a fake video.

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:36 am

Nice try, Google, but you can't apoliticize a workplace. Everything is political, including the workplace. 8)
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:39 am

Juristonia wrote:
This is coming a week or so following the release of the Project Veritas video and a subsequent PragerU video on the topic of political bias.


> Project Veritas
> Prager U
> Political bias

Fucking lol.

If there's anyone that should wonder whether or not they might be a wee bit biased.

How dare you? PragerU is a totally real university that totally produces genuine academic content... like this incredible graph:

Image
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Aureumterra
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8521
Founded: Oct 25, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Aureumterra » Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:41 am

Liriena wrote:Nice try, Google, but you can't apoliticize a workplace. Everything is political, including the workplace. 8)

I’m happy they’re trying, it’s about time big tech stopped it’s censorship
NS Parliament: Aditya Sriraam - Unity and Consolidation Party
Latin American Political RP
RightValues
Icelandic Civic Nationalist and proud
I’m your average Íslandic NS player
I DO NOT USE NS STATS!
A 12 civilization, according to this index.
Scary Right Wing Capitalist who thinks the current state of the world (before the pandemic) is the best it had been

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:41 am

Also, OP, the fuck do you think you are doing, citing the Project Veritas thing in your opinion after we spent days telling you why it was an unreliable source???
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sat Aug 24, 2019 9:42 am

Aureumterra wrote:
Liriena wrote:Nice try, Google, but you can't apoliticize a workplace. Everything is political, including the workplace. 8)

I’m happy they’re trying, it’s about time big tech stopped it’s censorship

> "it's about time big tech stopped it's censorship"
> cheers for google censoring its own employees in the workplace
> k
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163852
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sat Aug 24, 2019 11:58 am

Aureumterra wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Not particularly shocking that Google would prefer to have teams of drones working for them, not people.

Are you mad google is taking steps to keep politics out of the workplace?

"Mad" would be an overstatement, but yes.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:06 pm

Liriena wrote:Nice try, Google, but you can't apoliticize a workplace. Everything is political, including the workplace. 8)


In this particular case that would means turning the current ongoing political conflict in the Western World (and beyond) into an even bigger one by expanding the battlefields, and opening new fronts. Totaler Krieg.

Eitherway the Wired article shows and and explains in detail that this already happened in and it was rather poorly handled by the management.

Detailed background article

Liriena wrote:Also, OP, the fuck do you think you are doing, citing the Project Veritas thing in your opinion after we spent days telling you why it was an unreliable source???


Yes thats not good road.
Last edited by Nakena on Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:08 pm, edited 4 times in total.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cerespasia, Cyptopir, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, Ethel mermania, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Ineva, Inferior, Ioudaia, Mergold-Aurlia, Pale Dawn, Port Carverton, The Hazar Amisnery, Three Galaxies, Tiami, Tungstan, Varsemia

Advertisement

Remove ads