Condemn Consular
A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.
Category: Condemnation
Nominee: Consular
Proposed by: Eripolis
Acknowledging that the current World Assembly Resolution, Condemn The Land of Kings and Emperors, has not yet been passed,
Noting that Consular makes unfounded accusations against LKE, including:
Accusations of the invasions of belgium, Soviet Union, and Slavia, among others that Consular names, none of which were invaded by the LKE, and some of which were never invaded at all;
Accusations of violations of recruitment rules, which are simply not true, and;
Accusations of an invasion of the Rejected Realms, which is not true due to LKE troops being ejected from Belgium by The New Inquisition (TNI) troops to TRR, along with the troops of several other regions, leading to the misconception that LKE was invading TRR.
Noting that Consular uses poor language throughout the proposed Resolution, which includes such examples as:
"Attempted invasion of the noble and tenacious region of Moldavia no less than four times, all of which were rebuked, much to the embarrassment of the LKE's surprisingly incompetent military forces."
"Various other assorted affronts, such as having a garbage motto that is obnoxiously written everywhere in entirely capital letters, and publishing documents with broken amateurish formatting."
"...and boring everyone to death with catastrophically uninteresting text".
Astonished at how such a poorly written condemnation has made it through the evaluation/draft stage and is being voted For by many nations and regions,
Concerned that this may damage the Security Council's credibility as a legitimate peacekeeping force,
Fearing that this may lead to further poorly written proposals based on personal grudges, which will lead to the Security Council's credibility being damaged further, which may spread to the General Assembly without action,
Hereby condemns Consular for passing a poorly written resolution based on personal grudges and half-baked conclusions.
Pretty sure the whole thing is a tit-for-tat violation, and that the red section is a Rule 4c violation.
I remembered the link this time