NATION

PASSWORD

Star Wars: The Force Shall Free Us All

A coffee shop for those who like to discuss art, music, books, movies, TV, each other's own works, and existential angst.

Advertisement

Remove ads

If you could have a legacy upon the Star Wars galaxy, how would you want to be remembered?

As the fearless Jedi Knight, first into the fight against evil
3
4%
As the peacemaking Jedi Master
11
13%
As the shadow that lurks in the dark, influencing the galaxy with subtlety
9
11%
As the Sith Master that reveals themselves and dominates all opposition
18
21%
As the rogue who finds their fortune
2
2%
As the crime boss who lavishes in luxury
1
1%
As the bounty hunter that lives long enough to retire
7
8%
As the veteran soldier who fights for their cause for a lifetime
10
12%
As the daredevil explorer, placing their lives on the line to map the galaxy and reshape its very structure
10
12%
Dude, this galaxy's frickin' crazy, just let me be a normal civilian
13
15%
 
Total votes : 84

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Sun Jul 21, 2019 12:01 pm

Fedel wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
>didn't respect the backgrounds of pre-established characters

wait what


Elaborate on your confusion.


I'm wondering in what way TLJ "didn't respect the backgrounds of pre-established characters".
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Fedel
Minister
 
Posts: 2059
Founded: Mar 08, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Fedel » Sun Jul 21, 2019 2:43 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Fedel wrote:
Elaborate on your confusion.


I'm wondering in what way TLJ "didn't respect the backgrounds of pre-established characters".


In regards to how they handled Luke's character. I thought that would be obvious.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Sun Jul 21, 2019 3:09 pm

Fedel wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
I'm wondering in what way TLJ "didn't respect the backgrounds of pre-established characters".


In regards to how they handled Luke's character. I thought that would be obvious.


I dunno, Mark seemed pretty on board with it, and I'd say he knows the character better than anyone.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Andsed
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13443
Founded: Aug 24, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Andsed » Sun Jul 21, 2019 3:14 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Fedel wrote:
In regards to how they handled Luke's character. I thought that would be obvious.


I dunno, Mark seemed pretty on board with it, and I'd say he knows the character better than anyone.

Just because Mark may have been on board with it is not a good argument for addressing Fedel's claim.

Personally I feel like the way the handled Luke major change from his OG trilogy version was very poorly handled. That Luke would not even hesitate to rush to save his friend while this Luke needed encouragement to do so. And while that change would be fine it needs to be shown or explained which TLJ kinda failed to do.
I do be tired


LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
Ism
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6152
Founded: Oct 14, 2011
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ism » Sun Jul 21, 2019 3:23 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Fedel wrote:
In regards to how they handled Luke's character. I thought that would be obvious.


I dunno, Mark seemed pretty on board with it, and I'd say he knows the character better than anyone.


Everything I've seen points toward's Mark's attitude being more "I disagree with this, but I'll do my job." He wouldn't have joked that he was actually playing "Jake" Skywalker if he had thought it perfectly fit Luke's character.

Andsed wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
I dunno, Mark seemed pretty on board with it, and I'd say he knows the character better than anyone.

Just because Mark may have been on board with it is not a good argument for addressing Fedel's claim.

Personally I feel like the way the handled Luke major change from his OG trilogy version was very poorly handled. That Luke would not even hesitate to rush to save his friend while this Luke needed encouragement to do so. And while that change would be fine it needs to be shown or explained which TLJ kinda failed to do.


I wouldn't say fine, at least not for me, but it would be tolerable at least.

User avatar
Fedel
Minister
 
Posts: 2059
Founded: Mar 08, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Fedel » Sun Jul 21, 2019 5:34 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Fedel wrote:
In regards to how they handled Luke's character. I thought that would be obvious.


I dunno, Mark seemed pretty on board with it, and I'd say he knows the character better than anyone.


There's multiple interviews prior to him taking back what he said ( likely as a result of being reprimanded by Disney ) that suggest otherwise.
Last edited by Fedel on Sun Jul 21, 2019 5:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Andsed
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13443
Founded: Aug 24, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Andsed » Sun Jul 21, 2019 5:38 pm

Ism wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
I dunno, Mark seemed pretty on board with it, and I'd say he knows the character better than anyone.


Everything I've seen points toward's Mark's attitude being more "I disagree with this, but I'll do my job." He wouldn't have joked that he was actually playing "Jake" Skywalker if he had thought it perfectly fit Luke's character.

Andsed wrote:Just because Mark may have been on board with it is not a good argument for addressing Fedel's claim.

Personally I feel like the way the handled Luke major change from his OG trilogy version was very poorly handled. That Luke would not even hesitate to rush to save his friend while this Luke needed encouragement to do so. And while that change would be fine it needs to be shown or explained which TLJ kinda failed to do.


I wouldn't say fine, at least not for me, but it would be tolerable at least.

I mean if they had thrown in a line or something about how like Snoke had been manipulating Luke over the years or how he had just gotten paranoid over the years than I would have been fine with it. But because we really got no explanation it honestly felt pretty jarring for Luke to refuse to help his friends and attempt to kill a kid for showing some dark side thoughts.
Last edited by Andsed on Sun Jul 21, 2019 5:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.
I do be tired


LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44080
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Sun Jul 21, 2019 6:13 pm

Impaled Nazarene wrote:
New haven america wrote:Their so screwed right now that JJ's been forced to revisit the treatment for Episode 7 that Lucas made in order to get a movie out. No one wanted to listen to Lucas about how the ST should be done, but now it seems like he's their last hope to save the trilogy.

Gotta love the Post Disney Revisionism.
Old EU: Here's Mara Jade, the Thrawn Trilogy, a massive series of events that most fans have accepted as canon.
The Prequels: Hated, contained many bad ideas and riddled with poor execution.
George Lucas: I don't consider any of that EU canon. My ideas for a sequel trilogy will have none of that.
Fans: Fuk u george you're holding the franchise back

Disney: SCREAMING IN CAPITALISM AND MASHING THE TAMPER BUTTON
Some fans: Huh, that was good I guess but it didn't live up to its potential.
Some fans: HEIL LUCAS DEATH TO DISNEY! THE PREQUELS WERE SECRETLY GENIUS!
Other fans: This whole thing was insane

Star Wars fans will never be happy. If Lucas made the sequel trilogy it would have had all the flaws of the prequels all over again.

Before Disney bought Lucasfilms they had an entire division dedicated to cataloguing EU works and making an official/unofficial canon timeline and catalogue.

Yes, Lucas did actually care about the EU, not as much as some uber-fanboys did, but he did care. Hell, his treatment for Episode 7 after Disney threw out the EU actually did use some EU ideas (Like how his female protag Kira was basically a younger version of Mara Jade, they had very similar looks and personalities).
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44080
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Sun Jul 21, 2019 6:14 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Fedel wrote:
In regards to how they handled Luke's character. I thought that would be obvious.


I dunno, Mark seemed pretty on board with it, and I'd say he knows the character better than anyone.

Yeah, let's just forget the fact that almost every interview he did before the movie got released was him bashing the movie. :roll:
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Jul 22, 2019 1:15 am

Andsed wrote:
Ism wrote:
Everything I've seen points toward's Mark's attitude being more "I disagree with this, but I'll do my job." He wouldn't have joked that he was actually playing "Jake" Skywalker if he had thought it perfectly fit Luke's character.



I wouldn't say fine, at least not for me, but it would be tolerable at least.

I mean if they had thrown in a line or something about how like Snoke had been manipulating Luke over the years or how he had just gotten paranoid over the years than I would have been fine with it. But because we really got no explanation it honestly felt pretty jarring for Luke to refuse to help his friends and attempt to kill a kid for showing some dark side thoughts.


Literally cut himself off from the galaxy out of shame for being prepared to do exactly that.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44080
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Mon Jul 22, 2019 2:27 am

Vassenor wrote:
Andsed wrote:I mean if they had thrown in a line or something about how like Snoke had been manipulating Luke over the years or how he had just gotten paranoid over the years than I would have been fine with it. But because we really got no explanation it honestly felt pretty jarring for Luke to refuse to help his friends and attempt to kill a kid for showing some dark side thoughts.


Literally cut himself off from the galaxy out of shame for being prepared to do exactly that.

Actually it was because he got all of his students killed.

It wasn't him trying to kill Kylo that he felt shame over, it was the events afterwards that he felt shame for.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Alvecia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20358
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Mon Jul 22, 2019 4:34 am

Fedel wrote:Let's be clear here:

Disney is a passionless corporation only out to make money. They bought Star Wars in order to make it the next MCU ( an attempt which failed for multiple reasons ).

TFA was a bad remake of ANH.

TLJ was not formulaic but it was bad as it; had some jarring tonal issues, didn't respect the backgrounds of pre-established characters, seemed to often contradict itself in the message it tried to get across, was inconsistent with elements of its own universe and story, neutered its villains for the sake of comedy and shock value and generally just favored style over substance.

HOWEVER

Bringing Lucas in to implement his own ideas would not necessarily have been an improvement. While I believe Lucas to be creatively gifted, I do not think he's all that great at executing his ideas.

I will say that I think if Lucas had done the sequels they would have been better then what we got ( if still not we would have wanted ).

I think if helmed by a good leader (for lack of a better word) then Disney's "influence" doesn't really matter that much.

If we take the MCU for example, led by Feige. They've managed to do a spectacular job, taking some huge risks along the way.

User avatar
Fedel
Minister
 
Posts: 2059
Founded: Mar 08, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Fedel » Mon Jul 22, 2019 8:45 am

Alvecia wrote:
Fedel wrote:Let's be clear here:

Disney is a passionless corporation only out to make money. They bought Star Wars in order to make it the next MCU ( an attempt which failed for multiple reasons ).

TFA was a bad remake of ANH.

TLJ was not formulaic but it was bad as it; had some jarring tonal issues, didn't respect the backgrounds of pre-established characters, seemed to often contradict itself in the message it tried to get across, was inconsistent with elements of its own universe and story, neutered its villains for the sake of comedy and shock value and generally just favored style over substance.

HOWEVER

Bringing Lucas in to implement his own ideas would not necessarily have been an improvement. While I believe Lucas to be creatively gifted, I do not think he's all that great at executing his ideas.

I will say that I think if Lucas had done the sequels they would have been better then what we got ( if still not we would have wanted ).

I think if helmed by a good leader (for lack of a better word) then Disney's "influence" doesn't really matter that much.

If we take the MCU for example, led by Feige. They've managed to do a spectacular job, taking some huge risks along the way.


I think, on average, the MCU ranges from mediocre to decent. That to the side, I don't think what Star Wars is meshes with the idea of releasing multiple movies every year.

User avatar
The Biggles Syndicate
Diplomat
 
Posts: 939
Founded: May 18, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Biggles Syndicate » Mon Jul 22, 2019 8:56 am

We all know that it'll be a Thanksgiving feast for RedLetterMedia when Episode 9 comes out. Maybe we'll get more Nerd Crew episodes. :)

My boi Filoni and his crew will probably just go to some beach for a week or two and just wait the whole shitstorm out.

Collider will have an Ace Attorney breakdown.

That's my two cents on what'll happen with Ep.9.

User avatar
Impaled Nazarene
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10311
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Impaled Nazarene » Mon Jul 22, 2019 10:38 am

The Biggles Syndicate wrote:We all know that it'll be a Thanksgiving feast for RedLetterMedia when Episode 9 comes out. Maybe we'll get more Nerd Crew episodes. :)

My boi Filoni and his crew will probably just go to some beach for a week or two and just wait the whole shitstorm out.

Collider will have an Ace Attorney breakdown.

That's my two cents on what'll happen with Ep.9.

They implied that they wouldn't do one for 9. It seems RLM is kinda done with the whole Plinkett thing. Which is sad because that character is the only reason they have so many subscribers.
Anarchist
Kiaculta wrote:Oh, Kar, you silly sack of shit.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Bickering ist krieg.
Infected Mushroom wrote:isn't this a bit extreme?
Finland SSR wrote:"Many dictatorships are oligarchies.
Many democracies are oligarchies.
Therefore, many dictatorships are democracies."

-said no one ever. I made these words up.
Genivaria wrote:"WHY!? Why do this!? Thousands of planets and trillions of innocent lives gone! For what!?"
"It seemed like fun at the time."

User avatar
Impaled Nazarene
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10311
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Impaled Nazarene » Mon Jul 22, 2019 4:25 pm

I like how virtually every planet having a single biome has become an occasionally referenced joke. Canderous mentions Mandalore having tropical forests on the equator for instance.
Anarchist
Kiaculta wrote:Oh, Kar, you silly sack of shit.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Bickering ist krieg.
Infected Mushroom wrote:isn't this a bit extreme?
Finland SSR wrote:"Many dictatorships are oligarchies.
Many democracies are oligarchies.
Therefore, many dictatorships are democracies."

-said no one ever. I made these words up.
Genivaria wrote:"WHY!? Why do this!? Thousands of planets and trillions of innocent lives gone! For what!?"
"It seemed like fun at the time."

User avatar
Idzequitch
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17033
Founded: Apr 22, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Idzequitch » Mon Jul 22, 2019 4:55 pm

Forsher wrote:
Idzequitch wrote:Not sure where that idea came from, except for the sake of being overly dramatic. If you liked VIII, say something positive about it. Let's talk about it. I'll most likely disagree with that viewpoint and say so, and that's okay. But let's not devolve into moaning about the popularity (or lack thereof) of our viewpoints. If you liked it that's great. If you have a point, you're welcome to make it. And then I'll argue with you till Mustafar freezes over because I'll very likely disagree :P


You literally just said you agreed that Star Wars is an inevitable plane crash:

Idzequitch wrote:This is very much my attitude towards IX as well.


This isn't Vass' being overly dramatic but instead a perfectly reasonable interpretation of "Star Wars is crashing and burning". Note that there are 0 posts between your agreement post and Vass' "no positive opinions allowed".

Be more careful in your use of language and perhaps this problem wouldn't exist?

I'm still searching for the part where my dislike of the movie disallows positive opinions of said movie. I don't think my language was the problem here.
Twenty-something, male, heterosexual, Protestant Christian. Politically unaffiliated libertarian-ish centrist.
Meyers-Briggs INFP.
Enneagram Type 9.
Political Compass Left/Right 0.13
Libertarian/Authoritarian -5.38
9Axes Results

I once believed in causes too, I had my pointless point of view, and life went on no matter who was wrong or right. - Billy Joel

User avatar
Ism
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6152
Founded: Oct 14, 2011
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ism » Mon Jul 22, 2019 5:03 pm

Impaled Nazarene wrote:I like how virtually every planet having a single biome has become an occasionally referenced joke. Canderous mentions Mandalore having tropical forests on the equator for instance.


1. That world was Ordo, Canderous's homeworld, not Mandalore.
2. *screams in Naboo*

User avatar
Lord Dominator
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8900
Founded: Dec 22, 2016
Right-wing Utopia

Postby Lord Dominator » Mon Jul 22, 2019 5:35 pm

Alvecia wrote:
Fedel wrote:Let's be clear here:

Disney is a passionless corporation only out to make money. They bought Star Wars in order to make it the next MCU ( an attempt which failed for multiple reasons ).

TFA was a bad remake of ANH.

TLJ was not formulaic but it was bad as it; had some jarring tonal issues, didn't respect the backgrounds of pre-established characters, seemed to often contradict itself in the message it tried to get across, was inconsistent with elements of its own universe and story, neutered its villains for the sake of comedy and shock value and generally just favored style over substance.

HOWEVER

Bringing Lucas in to implement his own ideas would not necessarily have been an improvement. While I believe Lucas to be creatively gifted, I do not think he's all that great at executing his ideas.

I will say that I think if Lucas had done the sequels they would have been better then what we got ( if still not we would have wanted ).

I think if helmed by a good leader (for lack of a better word) then Disney's "influence" doesn't really matter that much.

If we take the MCU for example, led by Feige. They've managed to do a spectacular job, taking some huge risks along the way.

Not sure if Disney actually exerts a whole ton of influence, aside from their maintenance of their brand identity being relatively family friendly.

Open to being wrong of course, but my understanding is that Disney generally lets whoever is in charge of the respective studios do their things (Feige for Marvel, Lasseter for Disney & Pixar, whoever is actually in charge of the studio for Star Wars),

User avatar
Dylar
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7116
Founded: Jan 07, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Dylar » Mon Jul 22, 2019 10:07 pm

Ism wrote:
Impaled Nazarene wrote:I like how virtually every planet having a single biome has become an occasionally referenced joke. Canderous mentions Mandalore having tropical forests on the equator for instance.


1. That world was Ordo, Canderous's homeworld, not Mandalore.
2. *screams in Naboo*

Are you sure? I thought that Ordo was Canderous' clan name and that he was from Mandalore
St. Albert the Great wrote:"Natural science does not consist in ratifying what others have said, but in seeking the causes of phenomena."
Franko Tildon wrote:Fire washes the skin off the bone and the sin off the soul. It cleans away the dirt. And my momma didn't raise herself no dirty boy.

Pro: Life, Catholic, religious freedom, guns
Against: gun control, abortion, militant atheism
Interests: Video Games, Military History, Catholic theology, Sci-Fi, and Table-Top Miniatures games
Favorite music genres: Metal, Drinking songs, Polka, Military Marches, Hardbass, and Movie/Video Game soundtracks

User avatar
Ism
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6152
Founded: Oct 14, 2011
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ism » Mon Jul 22, 2019 10:13 pm

Dylar wrote:
Ism wrote:
1. That world was Ordo, Canderous's homeworld, not Mandalore.
2. *screams in Naboo*

Are you sure? I thought that Ordo was Canderous' clan name and that he was from Mandalore


The world and the clan have the same name.

User avatar
The Biggles Syndicate
Diplomat
 
Posts: 939
Founded: May 18, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Biggles Syndicate » Tue Jul 23, 2019 8:55 am

Impaled Nazarene wrote:
The Biggles Syndicate wrote:We all know that it'll be a Thanksgiving feast for RedLetterMedia when Episode 9 comes out. Maybe we'll get more Nerd Crew episodes. :)

My boi Filoni and his crew will probably just go to some beach for a week or two and just wait the whole shitstorm out.

Collider will have an Ace Attorney breakdown.

That's my two cents on what'll happen with Ep.9.

They implied that they wouldn't do one for 9. It seems RLM is kinda done with the whole Plinkett thing. Which is sad because that character is the only reason they have so many subscribers.

I was sort of thinking more like a big regular review, like Half in the Bag but most likely longer.

User avatar
Impaled Nazarene
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10311
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Impaled Nazarene » Wed Jul 24, 2019 10:12 pm

Just learned that Grand Admirals outrank Grand Moffs (at least in the old canon).
So this means that had Thrawn been a Grand Admiral earlier he would have outranked Tarkin. I would have loved to see Tarkin's face had he learned of an alien holding a higher rank than him.
Anarchist
Kiaculta wrote:Oh, Kar, you silly sack of shit.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Bickering ist krieg.
Infected Mushroom wrote:isn't this a bit extreme?
Finland SSR wrote:"Many dictatorships are oligarchies.
Many democracies are oligarchies.
Therefore, many dictatorships are democracies."

-said no one ever. I made these words up.
Genivaria wrote:"WHY!? Why do this!? Thousands of planets and trillions of innocent lives gone! For what!?"
"It seemed like fun at the time."

User avatar
Fedel
Minister
 
Posts: 2059
Founded: Mar 08, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Fedel » Wed Jul 24, 2019 10:22 pm

Impaled Nazarene wrote:Just learned that Grand Admirals outrank Grand Moffs (at least in the old canon).
So this means that had Thrawn been a Grand Admiral earlier he would have outranked Tarkin. I would have loved to see Tarkin's face had he learned of an alien holding a higher rank than him.


Out of curiosity, where'd you learn that little tidbit? Even I was unaware of that.

User avatar
Impaled Nazarene
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10311
Founded: Aug 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Impaled Nazarene » Wed Jul 24, 2019 10:31 pm

Fedel wrote:
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Just learned that Grand Admirals outrank Grand Moffs (at least in the old canon).
So this means that had Thrawn been a Grand Admiral earlier he would have outranked Tarkin. I would have loved to see Tarkin's face had he learned of an alien holding a higher rank than him.


Out of curiosity, where'd you learn that little tidbit? Even I was unaware of that.

https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Grand_Admiral/Legends
https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Grand_Moff/Legends

There isn't a direct citation so I wouldn't confirm it as outright canon but unless wookiepedia is THAT plagued with misinformation it seems to check out.

Speaking of ranks I'm still a bit annoyed that canon still hasn't realized how messed up rank badges have been since the early 2000s.

Kyle Katarn and Carth Onasi are Storm Troopers.
Last edited by Impaled Nazarene on Wed Jul 24, 2019 10:44 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Anarchist
Kiaculta wrote:Oh, Kar, you silly sack of shit.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Bickering ist krieg.
Infected Mushroom wrote:isn't this a bit extreme?
Finland SSR wrote:"Many dictatorships are oligarchies.
Many democracies are oligarchies.
Therefore, many dictatorships are democracies."

-said no one ever. I made these words up.
Genivaria wrote:"WHY!? Why do this!? Thousands of planets and trillions of innocent lives gone! For what!?"
"It seemed like fun at the time."

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Arts & Fiction

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Tarsonis

Advertisement

Remove ads