by Friday Freshman » Tue Jul 16, 2019 1:26 pm
by Araraukar » Tue Jul 16, 2019 1:33 pm
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Friday Freshman » Tue Jul 16, 2019 1:38 pm
Araraukar wrote:OOC: Not awake enough to go through this in detail, but just pointing out that GA #298, Reducing Spills and Leaks is still extant.
by Separatist Peoples » Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:08 pm
Friday Freshman wrote:Araraukar wrote:OOC: Not awake enough to go through this in detail, but just pointing out that GA #298, Reducing Spills and Leaks is still extant.
Araraukar,
I am aware of this but thank you for reminding me. One point that I believe this resolution addresses that GA #298 doesn't is the environmental side of things.
by Friday Freshman » Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:19 pm
by Grays Harbor » Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:41 pm
by Separatist Peoples » Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:41 pm
Friday Freshman wrote:Separatist Peoples wrote:OOC: It does. Don't submit.
I would argue that it doesn't specifically in terms of the fact that it doesn't address wildlife. Additionally 298, does not apply during the extraction process of any material, only spills or leaks during material transport and storage.
by Friday Freshman » Tue Jul 16, 2019 3:08 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:The entirety of your section 5 is excessive micromanagement. You may as well put when the cleanup crews are allowed potty breaks, and delineate appropriate mealtimes, in order to maximize the cleanup crew effort.
by Friday Freshman » Tue Jul 16, 2019 3:08 pm
Separatist Peoples wrote:Friday Freshman wrote:
I would argue that it doesn't specifically in terms of the fact that it doesn't address wildlife. Additionally 298, does not apply during the extraction process of any material, only spills or leaks during material transport and storage.
OOC: You haven't so specified that you only apply to extraction. So long as your proposal overlaps, it contradicts.
by Separatist Peoples » Tue Jul 16, 2019 3:53 pm
by Grays Harbor » Wed Jul 17, 2019 12:25 pm
Friday Freshman wrote:Grays Harbor wrote:The entirety of your section 5 is excessive micromanagement. You may as well put when the cleanup crews are allowed potty breaks, and delineate appropriate mealtimes, in order to maximize the cleanup crew effort.
Would you say that section 6 falls into the same problem?
by Ransium » Wed Jul 17, 2019 6:33 pm
by Imperium Anglorum » Wed Jul 17, 2019 9:01 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement