by United Civil Republic » Tue Jul 16, 2019 12:51 pm
by Araraukar » Tue Jul 16, 2019 12:59 pm
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Morover » Tue Jul 16, 2019 1:05 pm
Araraukar wrote:OOC: If this is a "redraft", where's the previous draft? Also, I can't see how this would be a good idea to implement WA-wide. Especially given the terminal vagueness and giving a committee the freedom to randomly mandate government spending.
Have you looked at the existing educational resolutions? What are you adding that is not already done by them and any reasonable nation to begin with? I mean, what good are you adding?
by Araraukar » Tue Jul 16, 2019 1:17 pm
Morover wrote:OOC: He had a draft he posted on the proposals spot that got marked illegal.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Morover » Tue Jul 16, 2019 1:21 pm
by Kenmoria » Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:10 pm
by United Civil Republic » Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:38 pm
by United Civil Republic » Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:39 pm
Kenmoria wrote:(OOC: Welcome to the General Assembly. Unfortunately, this topic seems to be one unsuited to the GA’s style of legislation. World schools aren’t necessarily needed given existing resolutions. Also, you have a few illegalities. However, your style of writing is good, so I encourage you to stay around here.)
by United Civil Republic » Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:39 pm
Morover wrote:Araraukar wrote:OOC: But none on the forums? Or was it saved in the Illegals thread?
OOC: I do not believe so, but it was marked illegal for duplication of GAR#80 and #159, as you mentioned, as well as an additional metagaming illegality it had (it mentioned regional delegates, I believe). If GenSec has something to add that I missed, let me know.
That being said, I gotta agree with Araraukar here. This seems to be unnecessary with the prior education resolutions currently in place.
by United Civil Republic » Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:40 pm
by Grays Harbor » Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:43 pm
by United Civil Republic » Tue Jul 16, 2019 2:46 pm
Grays Harbor wrote:Quotas of students? Seriously?
by Kenmoria » Tue Jul 16, 2019 3:00 pm
by United Civil Republic » Tue Jul 16, 2019 3:10 pm
Kenmoria wrote: Also, quotas are very hard to manage. Suppose the WSC made a quota of 1000 students, which the school filled, but then twenty of them suddenly moved abroad. Without much warning, the government will receive fines for noncompliance, and be unable to fix this if all other students are already in school.)
by Araraukar » Tue Jul 16, 2019 3:53 pm
United Civil Republic wrote:It is not the place of a resolution to decide how the committee operates
United Civil Republic wrote:I ask that you look at the 2nd redraft I have prepared.
United Civil Republic wrote:I ask that you look at the 2nd redraft I have prepared.
United Civil Republic wrote:I ask that you look at the 2nd redraft I have prepared.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by United Civil Republic » Tue Jul 16, 2019 4:01 pm
Araraukar wrote:United Civil Republic wrote:It is not the place of a resolution to decide how the committee operates
OOC: That is literally what this resolution should do.
Also...United Civil Republic wrote:I ask that you look at the 2nd redraft I have prepared.United Civil Republic wrote:I ask that you look at the 2nd redraft I have prepared.United Civil Republic wrote:I ask that you look at the 2nd redraft I have prepared.
Triple posting the exact same thing is spamming. It doesn't matter that you're the OP, it's still spamming.
by Araraukar » Tue Jul 16, 2019 4:09 pm
United Civil Republic wrote:OOC: Legally it can't. I can suggest the formation of a committee to oversee certain topics, but it can not dictate anything about the committee.
See Committees under Proposal Basics here: viewtopic.php?f=9&t=159348
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by United Civil Republic » Tue Jul 16, 2019 4:12 pm
Araraukar wrote:United Civil Republic wrote:OOC: Legally it can't. I can suggest the formation of a committee to oversee certain topics, but it can not dictate anything about the committee.
See Committees under Proposal Basics here: viewtopic.php?f=9&t=159348
OOC: That is not what that rule means. You just can't say who sits at the committee or how long they sit there.
by Grays Harbor » Tue Jul 16, 2019 4:13 pm
by Kyoki Chudoku » Tue Jul 16, 2019 4:19 pm
by United Civil Republic » Tue Jul 16, 2019 4:55 pm
Kyoki Chudoku wrote:The Chudokuren ambassador- Tokiko Suou- sat down, a new aide also beside her. Tokiko was a tall woman covered in tally-mark scars, an eyepatch covering her left eye- war wounds. In stark contrast, her aide was a cheerful young woman named Eimu Tanifuji, a smile plastered on her face.
“So, let me get this straight,” said Tokiko. “This proposal is about government funded schools which the government can choose not to fund- says its funded they see fit, see, Now, much as my government would love not to have to fund these things, wouldn’t that mean that, bear with me...they would not be funded? Or is that what the quota is for? Also, is this curriculum gonna be universal? ‘Cause that means that history classes would be all about things that might not have relevance to the nation the school is in, and that won’t do. Also, wouldn’t making the year periods of these “World Schools” different to local schools be an issue? And having to enrol a certain number of people in these things isn’t always a government decision. That comes down to parents in a lot of places. Even here it does.”
by Kenmoria » Tue Jul 16, 2019 11:41 pm
by United Civil Republic » Tue Jul 16, 2019 11:45 pm
Kenmoria wrote:“What exactly is the difference between a normal school and a world school? What is this proposal trying to accomplish by separating the two?”
by Grays Harbor » Wed Jul 17, 2019 12:06 am
United Civil Republic wrote:Kenmoria wrote:“What exactly is the difference between a normal school and a world school? What is this proposal trying to accomplish by separating the two?”
"A World School is different because it encourage students of all ages to think critically and challenge assumptions, develop independently of government and national systems, incorporates quality practice from research and the global community of schools, encourage students of all ages to consider both local and global contexts, and helps develop multilingual students."
by United Civil Republic » Wed Jul 17, 2019 12:14 am
Grays Harbor wrote:United Civil Republic wrote:
"A World School is different because it encourage students of all ages to think critically and challenge assumptions, develop independently of government and national systems, incorporates quality practice from research and the global community of schools, encourage students of all ages to consider both local and global contexts, and helps develop multilingual students."
So, an indoctrination center instead of an educational facility.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement