LGBT health issues and society

[Realm of Coffeecakes]

June is LGBT pride month and among the many things being discussed regarding the LGBT community is health. As I myself engaged in research at my college campus about metal and physical health issues facing the LGBT community, I came to the conclusion that the evidence that homosexuality and lesbianism are dangerous to society is overwhelming. HIV/AIDS rates and other STD rates are much higher among the LGBT community than the straight community and LGBT people are much more likely to sexual promiscuous. I also found that the rate of domestic violence is much higher among same-sex couples and that when it comes to violence, LGBT perpetrators tend to be even more brutal than their straight counterparts. After these findings, I just don't understand why we should consider homosexuality okay and normal or okay. Instead of being blindly politically correct for the sake of an ideology, I think it is better that we stand up for the truth and fight against homosexuality and find a cure for it to help the people struggling with it. What do you think? Please read the sources first.

Here are a few of my sources.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-aids ... H220100923

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/291357

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entre ... d_RVDocSum

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8838474

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?Db= ... d_RVDocSum

[Vassenor]

June is LGBT pride month and among the many things being discussed regarding the LGBT community is health. As I myself engaged in research at my college campus about metal and physical health issues facing the LGBT community, I came to the conclusion that the evidence that homosexuality and lesbianism are dangerous to society is overwhelming. HIV/AIDS rates and other STD rates are much higher among the LGBT community than the straight community and LGBT people are much more likely to sexual promiscuous. I also found that the rate of domestic violence is much higher among same-sex couples and that when it comes to violence, LGBT perpetrators tend to be even more brutal than their straight counterparts. After these findings, I just don't understand why we should consider homosexuality okay and normal or okay. Instead of being blindly politically correct for the sake of an ideology, I think it is better that we stand up for the truth and fight against homosexuality and find a cure for it to help the people struggling with it. What do you think? Please read the sources first.

Here are a few of my sources.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-aids ... H220100923

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/291357

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entre ... d_RVDocSum

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8838474

I consider your literature review to be lacking. The conspicuous lack of any attempts to challenge your own hypothesis in particular, along with its apparent basis in a correlative relationship with no attempt to establish a causal one.

[Realm of Coffeecakes]

June is LGBT pride month and among the many things being discussed regarding the LGBT community is health. As I myself engaged in research at my college campus about metal and physical health issues facing the LGBT community, I came to the conclusion that the evidence that homosexuality and lesbianism are dangerous to society is overwhelming. HIV/AIDS rates and other STD rates are much higher among the LGBT community than the straight community and LGBT people are much more likely to sexual promiscuous. I also found that the rate of domestic violence is much higher among same-sex couples and that when it comes to violence, LGBT perpetrators tend to be even more brutal than their straight counterparts. After these findings, I just don't understand why we should consider homosexuality okay and normal or okay. Instead of being blindly politically correct for the sake of an ideology, I think it is better that we stand up for the truth and fight against homosexuality and find a cure for it to help the people struggling with it. What do you think? Please read the sources first.

Here are a few of my sources.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-aids ... H220100923

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/291357

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entre ... d_RVDocSum

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8838474

I consider your literature review to be lacking. The conspicuous lack of any attempts to challenge your own hypothesis in particular.

I wasn't unable to find anything to go against my arguments. Even some of the LGBT people I interviewed in campus agreed and admitted that their condition felt like an illness.

[Vassenor]

I consider your literature review to be lacking. The conspicuous lack of any attempts to challenge your own hypothesis in particular.

I wasn't unable to find anything to go against my arguments. Even some of the LGBT people I interviewed in campus agreed and admitted that their condition felt like an illness.

That's a very telling double-negative.

Tell me, was this a theory-building or a theory-testing study? What was your sampling method?

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

TIL that despite overwhelming evidence that homosexuality is not a mental disorder, explicitly stated so by mental health care professionals, and that heterosexuals can be super promiscuous and spread HIV at alarming rates, I have to take a mere student’s biased “research” as gospel and fight the rainbow brigade. Totes. Totes.

I have been schooled... in bullshit.

[Realm of Coffeecakes]

I wasn't unable to find anything to go against my arguments. Even some of the LGBT people I interviewed in campus agreed and admitted that their condition felt like an illness.

That's a very telling double-negative.

Tell me, was this a theory-building or a theory-challenging study? What was your sampling method?

It started off as a simply undergraduate study to determine that types of mental and physical health issues that the LGBT community faced compared to society at large. Personally, I did not go in with any biases as it wasn't until after the research that I came to the conclusion that non-traditional sexual orientations and gender identities were bad for the society. The subjects were interviewed in private in empty classrooms. Some were alone, others weren't. It all depended on their class schedules and when they could be interviewed.

And as you can see I provided multiple unbiased sources.

[Highever]

That's a very telling double-negative.

Tell me, was this a theory-building or a theory-challenging study? What was your sampling method?

It started off as a simply undergraduate study to determine that types of mental and physical health issues that the LGBT community faced compared to society at large. Personally, I did not go in with any biases as it wasn't until after the research that I came to the conclusion that non-traditional sexual orientations and gender identities were bad for the society. The subjects were interviewed in private in empty classrooms. Some were alone, others weren't. It all depended on their class schedules and when they could be interviewed.

And as you can see I provided multiple unbiased sources.

Forgive me if I dont think you went into a study on homosexuality which you call a mental illness and wrong and say should be eliminated without any sort of bias.

[Realm of Coffeecakes]

TIL that despite overwhelming evidence that homosexuality is not a mental disorder, explicitly stated so by mental health care professionals, and that heterosexuals can be super promiscuous and spread HIV at alarming rates, I have to take a mere student’s biased “research” as gospel and fight the rainbow brigade. Totes. Totes.

I have been schooled... in bullshit.

My group's study was not funded by any political organizations nor were we bound by political correctness. Also, I provided multiple unbiased sources to back up my statements.

[Celritannia]

Homosexuality is not a disease, it does not need curing.
People need to stop using pseudoscience to hide their homophobia

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

TIL that despite overwhelming evidence that homosexuality is not a mental disorder, explicitly stated so by mental health care professionals, and that heterosexuals can be super promiscuous and spread HIV at alarming rates, I have to take a mere student’s biased “research” as gospel and fight the rainbow brigade. Totes. Totes.

I have been schooled... in bullshit.

My group's study was not funded by any political organizations nor were we bound by political correctness. Also, I provided multiple unbiased sources to back up my statements.

None of your sources are unbiased. Just saying.

[The New California Republic]

As I myself engaged in research at my college campus about metal [...]

A metallurgist. I can respect that.

I came to the conclusion that the evidence that homosexuality and lesbianism are dangerous to society is overwhelming. HIV/AIDS rates and other STD rates are much higher among the LGBT community than the straight community

Lesbians have lower STD rates than straight people, so methinks your conclusion is flawed.

LGBT people are much more likely to sexual promiscuous.

Perhaps because they have been forced underground for so long that they need to get sex as and when they can? So in that case it is the fault of society, rather than LGBT people themselves...

I also found that the rate of domestic violence is much higher among same-sex couples and that when it comes to violence, LGBT perpetrators tend to be even more brutal than their straight counterparts.

It's still a minority, and it is quite frankly a complete farce that you are using it as a weapon against the entire LGBT community at large.

I think it is better that we stand up for the truth and fight against homosexuality and find a cure for it to help the people struggling with it.

Truth? What truth? That you have added 1 and 1 and arrived at 5?

[Realm of Coffeecakes]

It started off as a simply undergraduate study to determine that types of mental and physical health issues that the LGBT community faced compared to society at large. Personally, I did not go in with any biases as it wasn't until after the research that I came to the conclusion that non-traditional sexual orientations and gender identities were bad for the society. The subjects were interviewed in private in empty classrooms. Some were alone, others weren't. It all depended on their class schedules and when they could be interviewed.

And as you can see I provided multiple unbiased sources.

Forgive me if I dont think you went into a study on homosexuality which you call a mental illness and wrong and say should be eliminated without any sort of bias.

It wasn't until after the study and research that I found it to be a mental health issue in of itself.

[Vassenor]

I think you misinterpreted one of them. Badly. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8838474 doesn't deal with homosexual perpetrators. It deals with homosexual victims.

[Great Minarchistan]

My group's study was not funded by any political organizations nor were we bound by political correctness. Also, I provided multiple unbiased sources to back up my statements.

None of your sources are unbiased. Just saying.

NCBI isn't unbiased? Sorry, what?

[Celritannia]

Forgive me if I dont think you went into a study on homosexuality which you call a mental illness and wrong and say should be eliminated without any sort of bias.

It wasn't until after the study and research that I found it to be a mental health issue in of itself.

Have you ever considered the fact that LGBT people have mental health issues because they are still targeted by society, or that people are still saying homosexuality is a disease?

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

Forgive me if I dont think you went into a study on homosexuality which you call a mental illness and wrong and say should be eliminated without any sort of bias.

It wasn't until after the study and research that I found it to be a mental health issue in of itself.

Again. It. Is. Not. A. Mental. Health. Issue. Homosexuals aren’t mentally ill.

I happen to find having black hair a curse on me. Almost a disease. Does it mean that factually and medically I have a mental disorder? No. It means I just don’t fucking like my black hair. There’s no need pathologize that.

[The Columbia-Republic]

June is LGBT pride month and among the many things being discussed regarding the LGBT community is health. As I myself engaged in research at my college campus about metal and physical health issues facing the LGBT community, I came to the conclusion that the evidence that homosexuality and lesbianism are dangerous to society is overwhelming. HIV/AIDS rates and other STD rates are much higher among the LGBT community than the straight community and LGBT people are much more likely to sexual promiscuous. I also found that the rate of domestic violence is much higher among same-sex couples and that when it comes to violence, LGBT perpetrators tend to be even more brutal than their straight counterparts. After these findings, I just don't understand why we should consider homosexuality okay and normal or okay. Instead of being blindly politically correct for the sake of an ideology, I think it is better that we stand up for the truth and fight against homosexuality and find a cure for it to help the people struggling with it. What do you think? Please read the sources first.

Here are a few of my sources.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-aids ... H220100923

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/291357

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entre ... d_RVDocSum

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8838474

June is LGBTQ Month. Not LGBT. LGBTQ stands for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transsexual, Queer. L.G.B.T.Q. Get it now?

[Geneviev]

Being LGBT isn't a disease that needs to be cured. Most of these problems are a result of discrimination in society.

[Realm of Coffeecakes]

Being LGBT isn't a disease that needs to be cured. Most of these problems are a result of discrimination in society.

How so?

[Highever]

Forgive me if I dont think you went into a study on homosexuality which you call a mental illness and wrong and say should be eliminated without any sort of bias.

It wasn't until after the study and research that I found it to be a mental health issue in of itself.

Oh yes, clearly your amateur study is more reputable and should be taken more seriously than the conclusion reached by medical professionals that it is not at all a mental disorder

[Celritannia]

Being LGBT isn't a disease that needs to be cured. Most of these problems are a result of discrimination in society.

How so?

There is not a table hard enough for me to whack my head against it.

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

Being LGBT isn't a disease that needs to be cured. Most of these problems are a result of discrimination in society.

How so?

You’re doing it right now. You are stating they’re a threat that needs to be fought.

[Great Minarchistan]

Being LGBT isn't a disease that needs to be cured. Most of these problems are a result of discrimination in society.

It's not like you can cure sexual/gender deviance anyways since it's apparently modeled in fetal development

[Realm of Coffeecakes]

My group's study was not funded by any political organizations nor were we bound by political correctness. Also, I provided multiple unbiased sources to back up my statements.

None of your sources are unbiased. Just saying.

Seriously? Aside from government sources, I even cited Reuters which it is the king of being unbiased. Just because a source doesn't fall in line with liberal ideology doesn't mean that it is biased.

[Celritannia]

None of your sources are unbiased. Just saying.

Seriously? Aside from government sources, I even cited Reuters which it is the king of being unbiased. Just because a source doesn't fall in line with liberal ideology doesn't mean that it is biased.

No credible medical journals, psychological studies, or even studies by LGBTQ individuals.