Qwertyuioplkjhgfd wrote:Bluelight-R006 wrote:Your whole argument against moderation is what I wouldn’t consider flaming. You have reasons and you don’t question their intelligence nor sanity. Also, I think if the moderators thought this was not legal, they’d have shut it down already.
And intention to offend is anything that shoves opinions down any players’ throat, or questioning their right to exist... sort of things that are out of topic and just questions the person itself and not his/her opinion.
Don’t forget, the rules protect you. If I called you a contemptuous noun, i’d be warned or punished.
That's the whole thing: I'm being ultra concerned with my language. Debate should be free thought, not so excessive to cause cyberbullying, but not so that I'm thinking so much about how to be polite and kind and just. And that is you, maybe if I argued for slavery with reasons and not questions intelligence, if I argued for killing Jews with reasons and not questioning neither the Jews nor the Nazis' intelligence nor sanity, I would still get shut down (the Jews example was in the rules). Talking about killing Jews is certainly pg-13 I would think if it was just a philosophical discussion (in my school we recreated the Nuremberg trials as a project, some people in that will say offensive things about jews).
Well yes, advocating for the friggin holocaust is messed up, people should be banned for that