Right-Wing Discussion Thread XVI: Making Things Right Again

[Hanafuridake]

As a side note, the term “totalitarian” implies the morally corrupt abuse of power, which I seek to avoid.

Your views seem heavily totalitarian, cartoonishly so. I don't know of any other authoritarian, outside of comic book villains, who want to abolish sex and replace families with state-run “hatcheries.”

[Nova Cyberia]

If you don't have this blasting from your computer speakers 24/7 then you aren't a real rightist. Change my mind.

What if you're a rightist but you don't like Monarchist Germany?

bad

[Cappuccina]

As a side note, the term “totalitarian” implies the morally corrupt abuse of power, which I seek to avoid.

Your views seem heavily totalitarian, cartoonishly so. I don't know of any other authoritarian, outside of comic book villains, who want to abolish sex and replace families with state-run “hatcheries.”

He seriously said that?

[El-Amin Caliphate]

Your views seem heavily totalitarian, cartoonishly so. I don't know of any other authoritarian, outside of comic book villains, who want to abolish sex and replace families with state-run “hatcheries.”

He seriously said that?

He doesn't see how sex is appealing and yes, he did say the hatchery stuff.

[Nova Cyberia]

As a side note, the term “totalitarian” implies the morally corrupt abuse of power, which I seek to avoid.

Your views seem heavily totalitarian, cartoonishly so. I don't know of any other authoritarian, outside of comic book villains, who want to abolish sex and replace families with state-run “hatcheries.”

Reminds me of Brave New World.

Shit, man. People don't understand 1984 and Brave New World were warnings, not advice.

[Hanafuridake]

Your views seem heavily totalitarian, cartoonishly so. I don't know of any other authoritarian, outside of comic book villains, who want to abolish sex and replace families with state-run “hatcheries.”

Reminds me of Brave New World.

Shit, man. People don't understand 1984 and Brave New World were warnings, not advice.

The only difference being that Brave New World had the government using drugs and sex to control people, while this state would try to block those things.

[Bienenhalde]

He seriously said that?

He doesn't see how sex is appealing and yes, he did say the hatchery stuff.

What matters is not one's subjective opinion as to whether or not sex is "appealing", but rather the objective issue of what effect it has on society.

[Hanafuridake]

He doesn't see how sex is appealing and yes, he did say the hatchery stuff.

What matters is not one's subjective opinion as to whether or not sex is "appealing", but rather the objective issue of what effect it has on society.

What is this even supposed to mean?

The state would be overthrown within a week if it seriously tried to make such a breach on human rights. Or face an exodus that would require a super-sized Berlin Wall.

[Nova Cyberia]

Reminds me of Brave New World.

Shit, man. People don't understand 1984 and Brave New World were warnings, not advice.

The only difference being that Brave New World had the government using drugs and sex to control people, while this state would try to block those things.

Yeah, I remember. The book literally ended with a giant orgie lol

[The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord]

As a side note, the term “totalitarian” implies the morally corrupt abuse of power, which I seek to avoid.

Your views seem heavily totalitarian, cartoonishly so. I don't know of any other authoritarian, outside of comic book villains, who want to abolish sex and replace families with state-run “hatcheries.”

My apologies, Hanafuridake; I can assure you that I had no intent to cause offense or be impolite. And the hatchery system is more intended as speculation than serious policy proposal, at least nowadays (since there was a time when I sincerely and wholeheartedly advocated for such a system; gosh, I was an embarrassment back then).

[Cappuccina]

He doesn't see how sex is appealing and yes, he did say the hatchery stuff.

What matters is not one's subjective opinion as to whether or not sex is "appealing", but rather the objective issue of what effect it has on society.

I agree. Sex has a role in creation and maintenance of the family stucture... therefore, it should not be abolished by the state in favor of detached birthing of man through "hatcheries". The State's role is not to replace the family.

[The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord]

My apologies; hopefully I haven’t inadvertently alienated myself from y’all via impropriety...

[Cappuccina]

My apologies; hopefully I haven’t inadvertently alienated myself from y’all via impropriety...

You're views are your views, I'm simply stating my opinion on them, don't take it personally.

[The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord]

My apologies; hopefully I haven’t inadvertently alienated myself from y’all via impropriety...

You're views are your views, I'm simply stating my opinion on them, don't take it personally.

You make a valid point, but I’m morally obligated to apologize and seek to make amends if I even suspect that I’ve done something improper and unbecoming of me, y’know?

[Hanafuridake]

My apologies, Hanafuridake; I can assure you that I had no intent to cause offense or be impolite.

Stop saying that. It's more annoying that you keep insisting on apologizing (and no, you don't need to apologize for this).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2k0SmqbBIpQ

[Cappuccina]

You're views are your views, I'm simply stating my opinion on them, don't take it personally.

You make a valid point, but I’m morally obligated to apologize and seek to make amends if I even suspect that I’ve done something improper and unbecoming of me, y’know?

Why are you morally obligated to apologise for your views? I'm just a person on the internet. Having opinions isn't improper.

[Kowani]

What matters is not one's subjective opinion as to whether or not sex is "appealing", but rather the objective issue of what effect it has on society.

I agree. Sex has a role in creation and maintenance of the family stucture... therefore, it should not be abolished by the state in favor of detached birthing of man through "hatcheries". The State's role is not to replace the family.

More importantly than that, it’s good for one’s mental health. We’re built for sex, evolutionarily.

The State’s role is completely subjective.

[Diopolis]

He doesn't see how sex is appealing and yes, he did say the hatchery stuff.

What matters is not one's subjective opinion as to whether or not sex is "appealing", but rather the objective issue of what effect it has on society.

And the family being more fundamental to social stability than the state, tinkering with it is a much worse idea than with changing the accidents of the state. Sex being rather fundamental to the establishment of the families, the role of the state is mostly to direct it towards the worthwhile end of building and procreating strong families as opposed to recreation or individualist liberation.

[Diopolis]

You're views are your views, I'm simply stating my opinion on them, don't take it personally.

You make a valid point, but I’m morally obligated to apologize and seek to make amends if I even suspect that I’ve done something improper and unbecoming of me, y’know?

Constant apologizing for things that don't need to be apologized for is improper and unbecoming.

[Cappuccina]

I agree. Sex has a role in creation and maintenance of the family stucture... therefore, it should not be abolished by the state in favor of detached birthing of man through "hatcheries". The State's role is not to replace the family.

More importantly than that, it’s good for one’s mental health. We’re built for sex, evolutionarily.

The State’s role is completely subjective.

Yes, sex is healthy, in the right context.

The State's role is maintenance of social order, and enforcement of policy to that end.

[The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord]

My apologies, Hanafuridake; I can assure you that I had no intent to cause offense or be impolite.

Stop saying that. It's more annoying that you keep insisting on apologizing (and no, you don't need to apologize for this).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2k0SmqbBIpQ

You make a valid point, but I’m morally obligated to apologize and seek to make amends if I even suspect that I’ve done something improper and unbecoming of me, y’know?

Why are you morally obligated to apologise for your views? I'm just a person on the internet. Having opinions isn't improper.

But what will I do when I cause offense, or do something morally wrong? Should I pay penance via mortification of the flesh?

[Diopolis]

Stop saying that. It's more annoying that you keep insisting on apologizing (and no, you don't need to apologize for this).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2k0SmqbBIpQ

Why are you morally obligated to apologise for your views? I'm just a person on the internet. Having opinions isn't improper.

But what will I do when I cause offense, or do something morally wrong? Should I pay penance via mortification of the flesh?

Mortification of the flesh brings discipline to the flesh; mortification to the ego brings discipline to the spirit.

[Washington Resistance Army]

Stop saying that. It's more annoying that you keep insisting on apologizing (and no, you don't need to apologize for this).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2k0SmqbBIpQ

Why are you morally obligated to apologise for your views? I'm just a person on the internet. Having opinions isn't improper.

But what will I do when I cause offense, or do something morally wrong? Should I pay penance via mortification of the flesh?

Pro tip: don't give a shit if you offend anybody, it's what I do

[Cappuccina]

Stop saying that. It's more annoying that you keep insisting on apologizing (and no, you don't need to apologize for this).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2k0SmqbBIpQ

Why are you morally obligated to apologise for your views? I'm just a person on the internet. Having opinions isn't improper.

But what will I do when I cause offense, or do something morally wrong? Should I pay penance via mortification of the flesh?

Causing offense and being morally wrong aren't the same thing, they can coincide, but one isn't necessarily the other in a given context.

If you're morally wrong make penance, surely. But if one simply happens to offend only by stating one's beliefs, that's the other person's problem, not yours.

[Totally Not OEP]

But what will I do when I cause offense, or do something morally wrong? Should I pay penance via mortification of the flesh?

Pro tip: don't give a shit if you offend anybody, it's what I do

Exactly this.