NATION

PASSWORD

Was German Reunification a Mistake?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Was German reunification, as it happened, a mistake?

Yes, Germany should never have been reunified
30
17%
Sort of, because it was done wrong and/or too quickly
47
26%
No
103
57%
 
Total votes : 180

User avatar
Neu Leonstein
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5748
Founded: Oct 23, 2005
Ex-Nation

Was German Reunification a Mistake?

Postby Neu Leonstein » Tue Jun 11, 2019 2:53 am

Simple enough question that I thought might be fun to discuss. To get this going, I'm going to go with a bit of a controversial language... but the underlying questions are real ones.

Germany was reunified in 1990, following the first gradual and then very quick collapse of the communist GDR's state authority. The two Germany's, and four victors of WW2 (France, UK, Russia and the US) agreed in the '2+4 Treaty' what the future of a unified Germany in Europe would look like (e.g. settling any outstanding border issues and so on).

And so West Germany found itself with a bit more than 16 million new arrivals. Poorer, used to and expecting generous welfare, with little to no appreciation for democratic values but a huge sense of entitlement. Which, if modern day critics of Angela Merkel are to be believed, is a recipe for disaster.

Since then, West Germany has spent literal trillions on supporting infrastructure and business investment in the east, and who knows how much more in welfare payments. Geopolitically, many might argue that the unified Germany is too big for Europe - meaning that the EU doesn't work as well for having one country in it that holds a disproportionate share of the economic activity and population.

So... was reunification a mistake? Or should it just have been done more slowly, and without an insistence that an East German Mark was worth the same as a West German one?

The latter is my own position. Pegging the currencies effectively pulled the rug out from under the East German economy, and was a big factor in the depression that followed and still hasn't been fully overcome. Going more slowly would also have given East Germans time to decide what sort of country they really wanted. The way it was handled, they rushed into reunification in the belief that they'd get freedom and wealth - but as their subsequent electoral choices tend to demonstrate, they've never been as open to a liberal society as those in the west are. In many ways, their preferences seem more similar to those in eastern European countries than they are to those in West Germany. It's probably too late to split things up again (at least until the EU unifies enough to allow these sorts of splits to be done easily and without causing particular disruption), but if there was a chance for a do-over, I would have given things a few years before reunification would be seriously considered.

But what say you?
“Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself in all cases as the age and generations which preceded it. The vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies. Man has no property in man; neither has any generation a property in the generations which are to follow.”
~ Thomas Paine

Link
Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33
Time zone: GMT+10 (Melbourne), working full time.

User avatar
Great Mojave
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 170
Founded: Aug 02, 2017
Anarchy

Postby Great Mojave » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:03 am

This does not bode well for the Korean peninsula. Similar conditions are present, but more extreme. I fear something identical could happen if they ever do put aside their differences.
_[' ]_
(-_Q)

Pro: 1st and 2nd wave feminism, Libertarian Party, Cryptocurrency, Capitalism, USA, Christianity, Space Travel, Civic Nationalism, 1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment

NEIN: Monarchy, Socialism, Mutualism, Communism, Syndicalism, Fascism, Wahabism, Islam (the idea, not its supporters.), Islamism, Theocracy, Authoritarianism, Corporatism
(Almost) not based on fallout! Also, we don't use NS stats.
Libertarian Republic of
Great Mojave
Now with 50% more sapient deathclaws!

The Year is 2050. The cities are big, the streets are bathed in neon, the desert is hot, and the wave is synth.

User avatar
Nakena
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5565
Founded: May 06, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nakena » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:06 am

I agree on the economic part.

However, East Germans keep being looked down upon by their West German brethen. It was more like an annexation rather than an unificaton, with some similarities to the reconstruction.

I find it very questionable that they are now being blamed for their voting preferences. Much like west europeans like to attack other east europeans over the matter. For many years people have been worked to bring the divided continent together again, it is very arrogant by how their opinions, views and legitimate concerns are being dismissed as evil and backwards.
Last edited by Nakena on Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
【Your friendly neighbourhood barista and genderqueer degenerate bohemian】
【Female or they/them pronoun preferred but not required】

₴Ø₦₳₭ Ø₴

User avatar
Neu Leonstein
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5748
Founded: Oct 23, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Neu Leonstein » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:14 am

Nakena wrote:I find it very questionable that they are now being blamed for their voting preferences. Much like west europeans like to attack other east europeans over the matter. For many years people have been worked to bring the divided continent together again, it is very arrogant by how their opinions, views and legitimate concerns are being dismissed as evil and backwards.

Blaming someone for their voting preferences is an extremely ok thing to do though. I mean, who else is responsible for one's voting other than oneself? So the judging part is fine - question is just whether you (or they) agree with my judgement. Which is largely a question of whether or not you share my politics.

So that's the general point. In this specific circumstance, when I look at PDS, NPD or AfD votes in the east, the comparison that comes to mind is the classic Eurabia meme that part of the internet loves to trot out: a whole bunch of people who aren't terribly into liberal and open societies voting for various forms of Sharia law. Like, if you didn't want to be part of this society, why move there in the first place?
“Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself in all cases as the age and generations which preceded it. The vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies. Man has no property in man; neither has any generation a property in the generations which are to follow.”
~ Thomas Paine

Link
Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33
Time zone: GMT+10 (Melbourne), working full time.

User avatar
East Angria
Envoy
 
Posts: 214
Founded: May 15, 2017
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby East Angria » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:18 am

Neu Leonstein wrote:And so West Germany found itself with a bit more than 16 million new arrivals. Poorer, used to and expecting generous welfare, with little to no appreciation for democratic values but a huge sense of entitlement. Which, if modern day critics of Angela Merkel are to be believed, is a recipe for disaster.

Since then, West Germany has spent literal trillions on supporting infrastructure and business investment in the east, and who knows how much more in welfare payments. Geopolitically, many might argue that the unified Germany is too big for Europe - meaning that the EU doesn't work as well for having one country in it that holds a disproportionate share of the economic activity and population.

So... was reunification a mistake?

How exactly did the East Germans have a "huge sense of entitlement"? They lived under an authoritarian government-industrial complex with little regard for economic efficiency or political and civil freedoms. Especially the rural population of the Ex-GDR was never integrated into the liberal democracy and the social market economy of the Federal Republic. All important decisions were made without hearing them. History basically skipped over most of rural East Germany. It is no wonder these people are getting so frustrated that they keep voting for neonazi parties and CDU.

It is important to keep in mind that even before the fall of the Berlin Wall, West Germany poured tons of money into the East. Compared to the other countries in the Eastern Bloc, the GDR was doing extremely well. One of the main reasons was the financial support they received from the west. Still, it would be absurd to expect the two halves of the country to integrate with each other seamlessly after reunification. Whole states were depleted of their population simply because there were no opportunities to work anymore in the East.

Germany didn't simple reunite. The FRG simply annexed the GDR. There was no founding of a new state, no new constitution, no attempt to combine the best aspects of both systems. This, of course, would have been impossible within the context of the Cold War ending etc. etc. But still, a lot of opportunities were ignored. The same power structures are still in place. Germany as a whole didn't become any more free, equal, and prosperous through reunification.

Neu Leonstein wrote:Blaming someone for their voting preferences is an extremely ok thing to do though. I mean, who else is responsible for one's voting other than oneself? So the judging part is fine - question is just whether you (or they) agree with my judgement. Which is largely a question of whether or not you share my politics.

I agree. There are systemic reasons forcing all those people to vote for fascists, though, not just individual ones.
Neu Leonstein wrote:So that's the general point. In this specific circumstance, when I look at PDS, NPD or AfD votes in the east, the comparison that comes to mind is the classic Eurabia meme that part of the internet loves to trot out: a whole bunch of people who aren't terribly into liberal and open societies voting for various forms of Sharia law. Like, if you didn't want to be part of this society, why move there in the first place?

A significant portion of the GDR's population didn't want reunification, and as stated above, they weren't asked. Some people still say that everything used to be better under the GDR. Some want the Berlin Wall back. They didn't have a choice once the majority voted Yes on reunification.
Last edited by East Angria on Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
the People of East Angria, a.k.a. the Anarchist Commune of Sassony a free territory covering most of the Low Countries, northern and western Germany, and continental Denmark, with a distinct social anarchist, pacifist, and solarpunk vibe.
This nation uses all Nation States stats except where it doesn't make sense. See our Factbook for more information.

Free Ubiased News:
| Vulfsborc first city with solar panels installed on 100% of houses | Conductor rail falls off of Vopadāl Suspension Monorail, strikes tramcar, bringing transport in the city to a screeching halt | Journalists bring to light fascist conspiracy within paramilitary forces and "prepper" scene |

User avatar
Neu Leonstein
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5748
Founded: Oct 23, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Neu Leonstein » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:28 am

East Angria wrote:How exactly did the East Germans have a "huge sense of entitlement"?

The most immediate thing that comes to mind is the expectation that their wealth, denominated in East German marks, should be exchanged into West German marks at a 1:1 rate. Which was nuts by any reasonable standard of value. Now granted, the expectation was due in no small part to the West German government doing nothing to help those in the east gain some perspective. Instead they caved in order to ensure that the CDU could win government in the east and bring about reunification.
“Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself in all cases as the age and generations which preceded it. The vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies. Man has no property in man; neither has any generation a property in the generations which are to follow.”
~ Thomas Paine

Link
Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33
Time zone: GMT+10 (Melbourne), working full time.

User avatar
-Ocelot-
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1683
Founded: Jun 14, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby -Ocelot- » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:43 am

You speak of West Germany as if it's the only real Germany and was forced to absorb some foreign poor land. Why should Germany split in half arbitrarily post USSR collapse? And why shouldn't the German state help poorer Germans? It's not like West Germany forcefully absorbed Swaziland or something.
Post Τenebras Lux

█████████
██████████
██████████

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 54019
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:50 am

I live in West Berlin and work in East Berlin. When I still had my bicycle, I passed Checkpoint Charlie everyday from/to work and yelled at tourists.

German reunification was not a mistake.

Though mistakes in the process were made. Like the 1:1 conversion.

But imagine, without reunification, we'd never have the BER airport.
Forumer mod, now a rocker mocker. Thank you Ringo
Heaven is other people
Behind the invisible hand of the market hides the iron fist of the state.
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect - Mark Twain
Silent is an anagram of listen.
Proud adopter of a lamb called violet: http://imgur.com/a/pxnSf
Male. Please address me as 'he'.
This is the 8th line. If your sig is longer than mine, it is too long.

User avatar
Neu Leonstein
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5748
Founded: Oct 23, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Neu Leonstein » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:51 am

-Ocelot- wrote:You speak of West Germany as if it's the only real Germany and was forced to absorb some foreign poor land. Why should Germany split in half arbitrarily post USSR collapse? And why shouldn't the German state help poorer Germans? It's not like West Germany forcefully absorbed Swaziland or something.

I suppose one could ask a question about what Germany constitutes the real thing. I mean, there are at least two candidates, if you're talking political entities and philosophies. One is the 1848 Frankfurt parliament, and all that stood for... which, to be fair, is where the Federal Republic took a lot of its inspiration. The other was the authoritarian, agrarian Prussia. The latter ended up taking political control once the Frankfurt parliament was violently ended, with known results. One way to read the break-up of the German Empire in 1945 would be as the freeing of liberal Germany from autocratic rule.

https://www.newstatesman.com/world/euro ... ns-germany
[...]

Why did Adenauer dislike the eastern Germans, think Berlin was expendable and consider the River Elbe to be the natural frontier? Simple: he knew that the Elbe was Germany’s Mason-Dixon line. Beyond it lay the flat, grim Prussian heartlands, which until 1945 stretched into present-day Russia. This vast region was known to Germans as “Ostelbien” – East Elbia. Adenauer viewed the “unification” of Germany in 1871 as East Elbia’s annexation of the west. That’s why in 1919, as mayor of Cologne, and again in 1923, he tried to get Britain and France to back a breakaway western German state. Having failed, he is said to have muttered, “Here we go, Asia again,” and closed the blinds every time his train crossed east over the Elbe.

Prussia was a different country. The victorious Allies agreed. On 25 February 1947, they declared: “The Prussian state, which from early days has been a bearer of militarism and reaction in Germany… together with its central government and all its agencies are abolished.” The name Prussia was eradicated. The Prussian hegemony of 1871-1945, an anomaly in the two millennia of German history, was over.

[...]
“Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself in all cases as the age and generations which preceded it. The vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies. Man has no property in man; neither has any generation a property in the generations which are to follow.”
~ Thomas Paine

Link
Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33
Time zone: GMT+10 (Melbourne), working full time.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 54019
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:55 am

Neu Leonstein wrote:
-Ocelot- wrote:You speak of West Germany as if it's the only real Germany and was forced to absorb some foreign poor land. Why should Germany split in half arbitrarily post USSR collapse? And why shouldn't the German state help poorer Germans? It's not like West Germany forcefully absorbed Swaziland or something.

I suppose one could ask a question about what Germany constitutes the real thing. I mean, there are at least two candidates, if you're talking political entities and philosophies. One is the 1848 Frankfurt parliament, and all that stood for... which, to be fair, is where the Federal Republic took a lot of its inspiration. The other was the authoritarian, agrarian Prussia. The latter ended up taking political control once the Frankfurt parliament was violently ended, with known results. One way to read the break-up of the German Empire in 1945 would be as the freeing of liberal Germany from autocratic rule.

https://www.newstatesman.com/world/euro ... ns-germany
[...]

Why did Adenauer dislike the eastern Germans, think Berlin was expendable and consider the River Elbe to be the natural frontier? Simple: he knew that the Elbe was Germany’s Mason-Dixon line. Beyond it lay the flat, grim Prussian heartlands, which until 1945 stretched into present-day Russia. This vast region was known to Germans as “Ostelbien” – East Elbia. Adenauer viewed the “unification” of Germany in 1871 as East Elbia’s annexation of the west. That’s why in 1919, as mayor of Cologne, and again in 1923, he tried to get Britain and France to back a breakaway western German state. Having failed, he is said to have muttered, “Here we go, Asia again,” and closed the blinds every time his train crossed east over the Elbe.

Prussia was a different country. The victorious Allies agreed. On 25 February 1947, they declared: “The Prussian state, which from early days has been a bearer of militarism and reaction in Germany… together with its central government and all its agencies are abolished.” The name Prussia was eradicated. The Prussian hegemony of 1871-1945, an anomaly in the two millennia of German history, was over.

[...]


In its Ostsiedlung the German settlers, that later formed the Prussian heartland, abSorbed quite some Slavs :blush:

And, if the Elbe is supposed to be a border. Keep in mind the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_ann ... Schut_Plan . An enemy from the West :p
Forumer mod, now a rocker mocker. Thank you Ringo
Heaven is other people
Behind the invisible hand of the market hides the iron fist of the state.
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect - Mark Twain
Silent is an anagram of listen.
Proud adopter of a lamb called violet: http://imgur.com/a/pxnSf
Male. Please address me as 'he'.
This is the 8th line. If your sig is longer than mine, it is too long.

User avatar
Neu Leonstein
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5748
Founded: Oct 23, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Neu Leonstein » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:57 am

The Blaatschapen wrote:And, if the Elbe is supposed to be a border. Keep in mind the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_ann ... Schut_Plan . An enemy from the West :p

Imagine the 1974 football team tho.
“Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself in all cases as the age and generations which preceded it. The vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies. Man has no property in man; neither has any generation a property in the generations which are to follow.”
~ Thomas Paine

Link
Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33
Time zone: GMT+10 (Melbourne), working full time.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 54019
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:58 am

Neu Leonstein wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:And, if the Elbe is supposed to be a border. Keep in mind the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_ann ... Schut_Plan . An enemy from the West :p

Imagine the 1974 football team tho.


Or any team thereafter. :blush:
Forumer mod, now a rocker mocker. Thank you Ringo
Heaven is other people
Behind the invisible hand of the market hides the iron fist of the state.
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect - Mark Twain
Silent is an anagram of listen.
Proud adopter of a lamb called violet: http://imgur.com/a/pxnSf
Male. Please address me as 'he'.
This is the 8th line. If your sig is longer than mine, it is too long.

User avatar
Duhon
Senator
 
Posts: 3933
Founded: Nov 21, 2018
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Duhon » Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:02 am

No. I would rather much have Germans not living in fear and poverty, thanks.

User avatar
Zrhajan
Diplomat
 
Posts: 952
Founded: Nov 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Zrhajan » Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:05 am

The Blaatschapen wrote:I live in West Berlin and work in East Berlin. When I still had my bicycle, I passed Checkpoint Charlie everyday from/to work and yelled at tourists.

German reunification was not a mistake.

Though mistakes in the process were made. Like the 1:1 conversion.

But imagine, without reunification, we'd never have the BER airport.

To be fair, we'll never actually get BER, just an endless construction site.
5D Political Test: Communist Pro-Government World-Federalist Bleeding-Heart Libertine
Collectivism score: 83%
Authoritarianism score: 33%
Internationalism score: 83%
Tribalism score: -100%

User avatar
Walkerfort
Envoy
 
Posts: 290
Founded: Mar 21, 2019
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Walkerfort » Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:13 am

I think I rather have a messy unified germany that is free rather than a robotic east germany under the soviet's thumb
leader: "i thought life was a tragedy... know i realize... it's a godamn comedy.."

DON'T CALL US HONG KONG OR CHINA! WE ARE INDEPENDENT

I think it's in the best intrests of those going through forums at sonic speed to be given a TL;DR
walkerfort stands alone against china

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 31877
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:38 am

Allowing Russia to grab East Germany in the first place was the mistake. You can't blame people who were born under the communist regime there and lived their entire lives that way to magically become prosperous and loving of democracy. It'll be generations before the damage is healed.

User avatar
Nakena
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5565
Founded: May 06, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nakena » Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:40 am

Neu Leonstein wrote:So that's the general point. In this specific circumstance, when I look at PDS, NPD or AfD votes in the east, the comparison that comes to mind is the classic Eurabia meme that part of the internet loves to trot out: a whole bunch of people who aren't terribly into liberal and open societies voting for various forms of Sharia law. Like, if you didn't want to be part of this society, why move there in the first place?


So you want to get rid of east germany because they aren't liberal enough for your tastes? Maybe you may want to go into another country then that suits more your tastes. Oh wait, arent you in the UK already?

Well they gone brexiting so, mhm, maybe that leaves Sweden or Canada under glorious Trudeau.
【Your friendly neighbourhood barista and genderqueer degenerate bohemian】
【Female or they/them pronoun preferred but not required】

₴Ø₦₳₭ Ø₴

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19054
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:58 am

The Treuhand being allowed to close much of East German industry following reunification was a big mistake that is still having economic repercussions today.
Last edited by Friedrich Nietzsche on Thu Jan 03, 1889 13:05 pm, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the complete victory over Caesar's Legion, and the pacification and annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.
Current President of The NCR: Aaron Kimball.
Current NCR Ambassador to The World Assembly: Colonel James Hsu, NCR Army (Ret.)
.

||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Blue Embassy
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 20
Founded: Sep 04, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blue Embassy » Tue Jun 11, 2019 5:11 am

Neu Leonstein wrote:And so West Germany found itself with a bit more than 16 million new arrivals. Poorer, used to and expecting generous welfare, with little to no appreciation for democratic values but a huge sense of entitlement.


I'm not sure what you mean by "expecting generous welfare" - is it because West Germany had it and they were expecting it since they were joining? Or they were supposedly used to generous welfare because they were living in a "socialist state"?

I will wait with my answer until then, I just want to make sure we're talking about the same thing.

User avatar
Bombadil
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10966
Founded: Oct 13, 2011
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Bombadil » Tue Jun 11, 2019 5:31 am

Neu Leonstein wrote:Simple enough question that I thought might be fun to discuss. To get this going, I'm going to go with a bit of a controversial language... but the underlying questions are real ones.


Oof.. 'fun' might not be the word..

So I'll go out on a limb with a bit of hyperbole perhaps to frame somewhat..

I think this is the central question and issue of the world today. I think the victory of Germanicus is possibly overplayed but also central to discussions of the world we want to live in. What have the Romans ever done for us?

One might point to the differing philosophies of Athens and Sparta and throw in Persia to the equation to address another fundamental issue, the divide between European and Eurasian, democratic and militaristic philosophy, but while important it's also more easily resolved as a question. One might argue that, in terms of cultural effects, China has longer cultural significance but the Chinese primarily view themselves as Chinese, regardless of North, South or provincial concerns.

Yet the issue of Germany combines all these. The propaganda derived from Germanicus through Prussian rule and export of that to America creates the split between a world of integration and disintegration. As much as America is subject to British Empire propaganda it is also subject to Prussian propaganda.

Integration or disintegration is the question, and its philosophy may be central to humanity anyway but I'm not sure there's a boundary equivalent to the Elbe that so closely defines the issue between a people of language and a people of philosophy.

It a floppy post but I'm okay with it in form of idea over exactness of detail.

To answer the question I equate the unification as a plaster being ripped off, the idea is you get over the pain quicker but it's up for debate over whether it's the best solution.

To the OP.. how much do you agree with the New Statesman article?
Eldest, that's what I am...Tom remembers the first raindrop and the first acorn...he knew the dark under the stars when it was fearless — before the Dark Lord came from Outside..

User avatar
Hammer Britannia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5167
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Father Knows Best State

Postby Hammer Britannia » Tue Jun 11, 2019 5:34 am

German Unification was a mistake in general tbh. Germany should have remained a fragmented mess like in the HRE.

As for the Reunification, I think it could have been given a couple of years to get the East used to Capitalism.
The FN FAL fetishist, Bisexual Libertarian Pagan, 27-year-old Boomer your mom warned you about
Supreme Dictator WA delegate of The Labyrinth. Please join, we have memes
Ifreann wrote:Having coined the name, I offer NSG this wisdom.

If you meet Witch Hitler, kill her.

Credit to this glorious flag go to Yegla Islands

User avatar
North German Realm
Minister
 
Posts: 2738
Founded: Jan 27, 2019
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby North German Realm » Tue Jun 11, 2019 5:34 am

The partitioning of Germany was a mistake in and of itself first of all. Occupation zones were necessary (especially for denazification), but allowing two German States with claims to being the only German State is a bad idea. It happened simply because each side didn't expect the other to leave the "honeymoon phase" that early.
Reunification was a good thing in and of itself, but it could (and probably should) have gone better. For one thing, Brandenburg should have been rebuilt and allowed to prosper rather than leaving it in the dust, but it was never a mistake. Unless DDR was willing to give up its claim to being "Germany", it should have not been reunified, but been annexed by BRD, just as it happened in real life.

-Ocelot- wrote:You speak of West Germany as if it's the only real Germany and was forced to absorb some foreign poor land. Why should Germany split in half arbitrarily post USSR collapse? And why shouldn't the German state help poorer Germans? It's not like West Germany forcefully absorbed Swaziland or something.

In all honesty, the two countries were pretty much as far from each other as Austria and Swaziland at that point in time, both in culture (rural East German against industrial West German or South German) and in the state of living and development. But it should have been helped back on its feet after annexation. Maybe then we wouldn't see it become a hub for fucking AfD of all things.
------------------
------------------
------------------
North Germany
Norddeutschland

North German Realm will go through a massive overhaul in the next few months. Please stand by.
Homepage || Overview | Sovereign | Chancellor | Legislature || The World
18 Apr, 1912
Norddeutsche Morgenpost: RMS Titanic completes maiden voyage, drops anchor in New York City! A glorious day for naval tradition. || Home Rule bill fails to find support from the House of Lords after success in House of Commons. || 100 Jewish residents in Fez brutally massacred by rebelling Moroccan soldiers. Britain threatens intervention. || Argentina introduces Secret Ballot.

User avatar
Neu Leonstein
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5748
Founded: Oct 23, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Neu Leonstein » Tue Jun 11, 2019 5:39 am

Nakena wrote:So you want to get rid of east germany because they aren't liberal enough for your tastes? Maybe you may want to go into another country then that suits more your tastes. Oh wait, arent you in the UK already?

Well they gone brexiting so, mhm, maybe that leaves Sweden or Canada under glorious Trudeau.

I'm not in any of the countries you mention. Nor, in truth, does it matter a great deal because as you well know, one addresses the message rather than the messenger. And the message is that east Germany by itself would be a less liberal country, and arguably west Germany a more liberal country, than the unified one. So if east Germans preferred to build a little Hungary, they'd have been better off doing that as an independent nation.

The New California Republic wrote:The Treuhand being allowed to close much of East German industry following reunification was a big mistake that is still having economic repercussions today.

All sorts of dodgy shit happened there, no doubt. But the fundamental issue was that at a 1:1 exchange rate east German companies were not competitive and many barely worth the scrap value of the machinery they had. Even that scrap was sold below value in many cases, but it's more of a social justice issue than a macroeconomic one.

Blue Embassy wrote:I'm not sure what you mean by "expecting generous welfare" - is it because West Germany had it and they were expecting it since they were joining? Or they were supposedly used to generous welfare because they were living in a "socialist state"?

I will wait with my answer until then, I just want to make sure we're talking about the same thing.

It's a bit of both. There wasn't really substantial economic risk in East Germany. Officially there was full employment, and the state was in charge of distributing what was being produced (for money, of course, but the problem with getting your Trabi was where in the queue you were, not if you could afford it). Living expenses were subsidised hugely. The risk was political, more so than economic.

For a lot of people in east Germany, it seems, they were happy to have the political risk removed, but the economic risk became (and still is) a massive sticking point for a lot of voters in the east. It's almost as though reunification in the east meant bringing western goods to them at western prices, and not much else. The condition for achieving that was the conversion of their salaries, benefits and pensions at a 1:1 rate, except it backfired.
“Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself in all cases as the age and generations which preceded it. The vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies. Man has no property in man; neither has any generation a property in the generations which are to follow.”
~ Thomas Paine

Link
Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33
Time zone: GMT+10 (Melbourne), working full time.

User avatar
Pasong Tirad
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9215
Founded: May 31, 2007
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Pasong Tirad » Tue Jun 11, 2019 5:40 am

Yes, and quite frankly they weren't divided enough. They should have been divided into several hundred states nominally united under one head of state elected not by the general populace but by several specially-designated electors.

This all seems familiar somehow, but I can't quite place it.

User avatar
District H
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Feb 15, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby District H » Tue Jun 11, 2019 5:41 am

No, not at all. But, the 2 Koreas are in a worse situation than Germany

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: An Alan Smithee Nation, Caleonia, Cannot think of a name, Duhon, Fartsniffage, Gormwood, Gravlen, Grinning Dragon, Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, Infected Mushroom, Miami Shores, Mzeusia, Nakena, Num Vent, SD_Film Artists, Serconas, Souseiseki, The Blaatschapen, The Republic of Fore, Vassenor, Washington Resistance Army, Xuloqoia, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads