It's Jocospor, their understanding of anything about NS is...finite.
Advertisement
by Wallenburg » Sun Jun 02, 2019 3:13 pm
by Catsfern » Sun Jun 02, 2019 3:35 pm
by Lord Dominator » Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:50 pm
Catsfern wrote:Am I the only one noticing that consular hasn’t said anything in a while, I wonder why hmmmmmm
by Consular » Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:36 pm
Catsfern wrote:Consular wrote:Should add -- I'm not saying this was my plan all along or anything like that. I'm not that machiavellian. It would have been great if this passed. But frankly I thought that was always fairly unlikely -- and I wanted to push the limits of what we could get away with. Pushed too hard. GG gents. I hope this was an interesting drama for everyone involved and the spectators.
I don’t really think you should be using a serious institution like the W.A. For “fun”
RiderSyl wrote:Own up to it, maybe.
by Isaris » Sun Jun 02, 2019 6:07 pm
Consular wrote:Catsfern wrote:
I don’t really think you should be using a serious institution like the W.A. For “fun”
This is a game. I feel like some of you forget that. The only reason I do anything here is for fun.
I'd probably do it again.RiderSyl wrote:Own up to it, maybe.
Have I not?
I wanted to see just how much bullshit we could get away with. The answer was "not that much" -- which was unfortunate but also very interesting.
You'd be surprised by the amount of individual nations who, far from getting swept up in the tide of upset feelings, don't care at all and still voted for.
The faux outrage over one faked image is fascinating. I've faked entire logs before with less fallout.
Already congratulated the other side on winning. Some rather salty winners, gotta say.
Some of you need to detach yourselves a little and relax.
by Eumaeus » Sun Jun 02, 2019 6:50 pm
Isaris wrote:This whole shpeel here is exactly why you should be condemned and why mods blocking such proposals because of "tit for tat" rule should be ashamed of themselves. It's not tit for tat when your condemnation of LKE failed. It's not tit for tat when you falsified evidence to frame a region. You are a criminal as far as I'm concerned.
Proposals which are solely 'tit-for-tat' proposals (ie Condemns Nation X for Condemning Nation Y) will be deleted. However, if they have other substance to them besides the 'tit-for-tat' argument, they are unlikely to be deleted...
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by Lord Dominator » Sun Jun 02, 2019 6:51 pm
Isaris wrote:why mods blocking such proposals because of "tit for tat" rule should be ashamed of themselves.
by Catsfern » Sun Jun 02, 2019 6:58 pm
by RiderSyl » Sun Jun 02, 2019 8:10 pm
Consular wrote:I wanted to see just how much bullshit we could get away with. The answer was "not that much" -- which was unfortunate but also very interesting.
Consular wrote:You'd be surprised by the amount of individual nations who, far from getting swept up in the tide of upset feelings, don't care at all and still voted for.
Consular wrote:The faux outrage over one faked image is fascinating. I've faked entire logs before with less fallout.
Consular wrote:Some of you need to detach yourselves a little and relax.
by Land of the Nobles » Sun Jun 02, 2019 11:18 pm
by Isaris » Sun Jun 02, 2019 11:52 pm
Eumaeus wrote:Isaris wrote:This whole shpeel here is exactly why you should be condemned and why mods blocking such proposals because of "tit for tat" rule should be ashamed of themselves. It's not tit for tat when your condemnation of LKE failed. It's not tit for tat when you falsified evidence to frame a region. You are a criminal as far as I'm concerned.
From the Compendium of Mod Rulings:Proposals which are solely 'tit-for-tat' proposals (ie Condemns Nation X for Condemning Nation Y) will be deleted. However, if they have other substance to them besides the 'tit-for-tat' argument, they are unlikely to be deleted...
All anyone has to do is find something else to add to their Condemnation. So far there are three authors drafting proposals on the forum, and three authors who submitted proposals without drafting, and only one of them has indicated that they are willing to research additional arguments. All any of them needs to do is find an additional substantive reason to condemn him and the tit-for-tat rule no longer applies.
by Jocospor » Mon Jun 03, 2019 1:02 am
RiderSyl wrote:Consular wrote:Have I not?
Nope, you haven't. This "just a prank bro" bullshit is a guide on how not to take responsibility for a mistake.Consular wrote:I wanted to see just how much bullshit we could get away with. The answer was "not that much" -- which was unfortunate but also very interesting.
Right. Looking forward to your essay.Consular wrote:You'd be surprised by the amount of individual nations who, far from getting swept up in the tide of upset feelings, don't care at all and still voted for.
No, I wouldn't be surprised, because The Lemming Effect is a well-known, time-tested phenomena. Using The Lemming Effect to act like the people that paid attention are just displaying "upset feelings" is very disingenuous. But hey, maybe you making that disingenuous argument is just another social experiment!Consular wrote:The faux outrage over one faked image is fascinating. I've faked entire logs before with less fallout.
...you did it in a mass WA telegram this time. Of course there's more fallout. D'oh.Consular wrote:Some of you need to detach yourselves a little and relax.
"Just a prank, bro, chillllll"
by Satuga » Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:04 am
Blueflarst wrote:
As a monarchy i have less corruption than other nations like my friend republic Furbish islands
by Eumaeus » Mon Jun 03, 2019 6:15 am
Isaris wrote:Eumaeus wrote:From the Compendium of Mod Rulings:
All anyone has to do is find something else to add to their Condemnation. So far there are three authors drafting proposals on the forum, and three authors who submitted proposals without drafting, and only one of them has indicated that they are willing to research additional arguments. All any of them needs to do is find an additional substantive reason to condemn him and the tit-for-tat rule no longer applies.
Except Rowan's proposal is not about the attempt to condemn LKE itself, it is about the manner in which that was done and that's clear to anyone with basic reading comprehension? If lying to the world in order to use this institution as a tool of personal grievance isn't condemnable, then what is?
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by Lord Dominator » Mon Jun 03, 2019 7:40 am
Land of the Nobles wrote:Consular has poisoned the well so to speak. We have Direct proof of collusion, direct proof of his lies And direct proof he is abusing his powers. In real life this is an invitation to war.
by Lord Dominator » Mon Jun 03, 2019 7:51 am
Isaris wrote:Eumaeus wrote:From the Compendium of Mod Rulings:
All anyone has to do is find something else to add to their Condemnation. So far there are three authors drafting proposals on the forum, and three authors who submitted proposals without drafting, and only one of them has indicated that they are willing to research additional arguments. All any of them needs to do is find an additional substantive reason to condemn him and the tit-for-tat rule no longer applies.
Except Rowan's proposal is not about the attempt to condemn LKE itself, it is about the manner in which that was done and that's clear to anyone with basic reading comprehension? If lying to the world in order to use this institution as a tool of personal grievance isn't condemnable, then what is?
by Catsfern » Mon Jun 03, 2019 8:11 am
by Unibot III » Mon Jun 03, 2019 11:24 am
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Old Hope » Mon Jun 03, 2019 12:32 pm
Unibot III wrote:Time for another author to make a legitimate case for LKE’s condemnation.
Imperium Anglorum wrote:The format wars are a waste of time.
by Lord Dominator » Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:43 pm
by Consular » Mon Jun 03, 2019 8:24 pm
by Wallenburg » Mon Jun 03, 2019 10:52 pm
by Catsfern » Tue Jun 04, 2019 6:41 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement