You ain't about that life, sit down.
Advertisement
by Chernoslavia » Fri May 17, 2019 8:00 pm
by Chernoslavia » Fri May 17, 2019 8:01 pm
by Andsed » Fri May 17, 2019 8:03 pm
by Chernoslavia » Fri May 17, 2019 8:09 pm
by Chernoslavia » Fri May 17, 2019 8:09 pm
Andsed wrote:Chernoslavia wrote:
Wrong.
Yes it is. Anyone who has a brain and understands anything about vaccines know that they are easily one of the greatest medical inventions of all time. They are the reason that measles cases dropped so much and why these outbreaks caused by people not getting vaccinated don't spread further.
by Inkopolitia » Fri May 17, 2019 8:11 pm
by Kowani » Fri May 17, 2019 8:16 pm
Chernoslavia wrote:Andsed wrote:Yes it is. Anyone who has a brain and understands anything about vaccines know that they are easily one of the greatest medical inventions of all time. They are the reason that measles cases dropped so much and why these outbreaks caused by people not getting vaccinated don't spread further.
Read above.
by Duhon » Fri May 17, 2019 8:21 pm
by The Greater Ohio Valley » Fri May 17, 2019 9:02 pm
by The Free Joy State » Fri May 17, 2019 11:18 pm
by Hurtful Thoughts » Fri May 17, 2019 11:58 pm
Mokostana wrote:See, Hurty cared not if the mission succeeded or not, as long as it was spectacular trainwreck. Sometimes that was the host Nation firing a SCUD into a hospital to destroy a foreign infection and accidentally sparking a rebellion... or accidentally starting the Mokan Drug War
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:If there was only a "like" button for NS posts....
by Duhon » Sat May 18, 2019 12:46 am
Hurtful Thoughts wrote:... and is usuallly a best-case scenario since anti-vaxxers tend to flock together it seems in yet another effort to remove themselves from the gene-pool.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Sat May 18, 2019 12:57 am
Hurtful Thoughts wrote:I'm a bit late to the Health-Impact-News bashing.... but it irk'd me that they got the definition of herd-immunity completely backwards.
It isn't to keep those vaccinated from getting sick off the unvaccinated... it's to keep the unvaccinated from coming into contact with a sick person, and thus effectively insulating them from the disease because there's nobody for them to get sick from unless they start licking random lightswitches.
If the vaccinated kid is getting sick off an unvaccinated one... herd immunity has already failed because the unvacinated kid somehow managed to get sick despite being surrounded by vaccinated kids as a buffer.
The 97% mark is a probability on how many people need to be vaccinated in order to make it unlikely for a disease to spread in a self-sustaining manner, and is usuallly a best-case scenario since anti-vaxxers tend to flock together it seems in yet another effort to remove themselves from the gene-pool.
...
When your uncle is a catttle-broker, you learn how to herd-immunity and how not to herd-immunity.
-If the measels-infected anti-vaxxing community were a dairy farm... we'd have to put down the entire stock and burn the remains to prevent the encephalitis from spreading.
--This often must be done without hesitation.
by The Free Joy State » Sat May 18, 2019 1:02 am
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Hurtful Thoughts wrote:I'm a bit late to the Health-Impact-News bashing.... but it irk'd me that they got the definition of herd-immunity completely backwards.
It isn't to keep those vaccinated from getting sick off the unvaccinated... it's to keep the unvaccinated from coming into contact with a sick person, and thus effectively insulating them from the disease because there's nobody for them to get sick from unless they start licking random lightswitches.
If the vaccinated kid is getting sick off an unvaccinated one... herd immunity has already failed because the unvacinated kid somehow managed to get sick despite being surrounded by vaccinated kids as a buffer.
The 97% mark is a probability on how many people need to be vaccinated in order to make it unlikely for a disease to spread in a self-sustaining manner, and is usuallly a best-case scenario since anti-vaxxers tend to flock together it seems in yet another effort to remove themselves from the gene-pool.
...
When your uncle is a catttle-broker, you learn how to herd-immunity and how not to herd-immunity.
-If the measels-infected anti-vaxxing community were a dairy farm... we'd have to put down the entire stock and burn the remains to prevent the encephalitis from spreading.
--This often must be done without hesitation.
You seem to assume disease is a bad thing.
by The Greater Ohio Valley » Sat May 18, 2019 1:23 am
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Hurtful Thoughts wrote:I'm a bit late to the Health-Impact-News bashing.... but it irk'd me that they got the definition of herd-immunity completely backwards.
It isn't to keep those vaccinated from getting sick off the unvaccinated... it's to keep the unvaccinated from coming into contact with a sick person, and thus effectively insulating them from the disease because there's nobody for them to get sick from unless they start licking random lightswitches.
If the vaccinated kid is getting sick off an unvaccinated one... herd immunity has already failed because the unvacinated kid somehow managed to get sick despite being surrounded by vaccinated kids as a buffer.
The 97% mark is a probability on how many people need to be vaccinated in order to make it unlikely for a disease to spread in a self-sustaining manner, and is usuallly a best-case scenario since anti-vaxxers tend to flock together it seems in yet another effort to remove themselves from the gene-pool.
...
When your uncle is a catttle-broker, you learn how to herd-immunity and how not to herd-immunity.
-If the measels-infected anti-vaxxing community were a dairy farm... we'd have to put down the entire stock and burn the remains to prevent the encephalitis from spreading.
--This often must be done without hesitation.
You seem to assume disease is a bad thing.
by Duhon » Sat May 18, 2019 1:24 am
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Hurtful Thoughts wrote:I'm a bit late to the Health-Impact-News bashing.... but it irk'd me that they got the definition of herd-immunity completely backwards.
It isn't to keep those vaccinated from getting sick off the unvaccinated... it's to keep the unvaccinated from coming into contact with a sick person, and thus effectively insulating them from the disease because there's nobody for them to get sick from unless they start licking random lightswitches.
If the vaccinated kid is getting sick off an unvaccinated one... herd immunity has already failed because the unvacinated kid somehow managed to get sick despite being surrounded by vaccinated kids as a buffer.
The 97% mark is a probability on how many people need to be vaccinated in order to make it unlikely for a disease to spread in a self-sustaining manner, and is usuallly a best-case scenario since anti-vaxxers tend to flock together it seems in yet another effort to remove themselves from the gene-pool.
...
When your uncle is a catttle-broker, you learn how to herd-immunity and how not to herd-immunity.
-If the measels-infected anti-vaxxing community were a dairy farm... we'd have to put down the entire stock and burn the remains to prevent the encephalitis from spreading.
--This often must be done without hesitation.
You seem to assume disease is a bad thing.
by Neanderthaland » Sat May 18, 2019 1:56 am
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Hurtful Thoughts wrote:I'm a bit late to the Health-Impact-News bashing.... but it irk'd me that they got the definition of herd-immunity completely backwards.
It isn't to keep those vaccinated from getting sick off the unvaccinated... it's to keep the unvaccinated from coming into contact with a sick person, and thus effectively insulating them from the disease because there's nobody for them to get sick from unless they start licking random lightswitches.
If the vaccinated kid is getting sick off an unvaccinated one... herd immunity has already failed because the unvacinated kid somehow managed to get sick despite being surrounded by vaccinated kids as a buffer.
The 97% mark is a probability on how many people need to be vaccinated in order to make it unlikely for a disease to spread in a self-sustaining manner, and is usuallly a best-case scenario since anti-vaxxers tend to flock together it seems in yet another effort to remove themselves from the gene-pool.
...
When your uncle is a catttle-broker, you learn how to herd-immunity and how not to herd-immunity.
-If the measels-infected anti-vaxxing community were a dairy farm... we'd have to put down the entire stock and burn the remains to prevent the encephalitis from spreading.
--This often must be done without hesitation.
You seem to assume disease is a bad thing.
by Thermodolia » Sat May 18, 2019 3:05 am
by Thermodolia » Sat May 18, 2019 3:17 am
Duhon wrote:Hurtful Thoughts wrote:... and is usuallly a best-case scenario since anti-vaxxers tend to flock together it seems in yet another effort to remove themselves from the gene-pool.
Aren't you an optimist.
Have antivaxxers gone so far as to call quarantine -- that other way of containing the spread of especially virulent pathogens -- some form of fake news, and so demand that they be allowed to do their daily chores unhampered even if they might be vectors?
by Duhon » Sat May 18, 2019 3:20 am
Thermodolia wrote:Duhon wrote:
Aren't you an optimist.
Have antivaxxers gone so far as to call quarantine -- that other way of containing the spread of especially virulent pathogens -- some form of fake news, and so demand that they be allowed to do their daily chores unhampered even if they might be vectors?
That’s not what they are saying. He’s basically saying that Anti-vaxxers and those who support them should be separated from society permanently
by Kinectia » Sat May 18, 2019 4:59 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Ferelith, Foxyshire, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Ifreann, Inferior, Kannap, Magical Hypnosis Border Collie of Doom, Oceasia, Ors Might, Pale Dawn, Philjia, Port Carverton
Advertisement