The Premise:
After a string of mysterious car crashes and carjackings in @@Your nation@@, investigators have discovered that they were all caused by remote devices hacking into aftermarket “smart” car alarms installed on every automobile in question. These car alarms were easy to hack and gave hackers the ability to unlock doors, apply the brakes, and even stall the engine of the car they were installed in. Now a mob of angry soccer moms, car alarm CEOs, and random but equally opinionated bystanders have swarmed your office.
Option #1
“Imagine,” begins mini-van owning soccer mom,@@random female name@@, in what you just know will be a long winded speech by the way she sets her purse on your desk and adjusts her sweater. “I was dooped! Deceived. They told me the “smart alarm” would make my life easier and safer! I don’t know how I can drive now knowing that some nefarious creep might be plotting my demise at every turn, literally. You must make the businesses that manufacture these alarms pay for what they have done. They must recall their maniacal products and pay the poor saps who bought these life ending devices monetary compensation.”
Outcome: Buisnesses set more money aside for monetary compensation for their products than for the actual development of their products.
Option #2
Just as @@same random female name@@ is about to launch into the “think of the children” section of her monologue, she is dragged out by what seems to be the private security force of a smart dressed man. “@@random male name@@ here,” he begins after taking a seat in front of you and sitting a briefcase on your desk. “I work for Dodgeson & Ford attorneys at law. We represent the manufacturer of these remote automotive alarm system devices. To put it in layman’s terms, the company I represent isn’t, shouldn’t, and cannot be held responsible for the exploitation of this system flaw. My client’s only intention was to build a quality smart alarm system. The fact that it was easily hacked is not a liability on our end. For the sake of the continual promotion of capitalism we emplore you not to hold our client accountable.
Outcome: Anyone can do just about anything so long as they say it is “for the promotion of capitalism”
Option #3
“I have a solution!” wails @@random female name@@, a noteworthy communist, as she bounds into the room and lands atop your desk. ““This event, among many others, show that companies can’t be trusted to have the consumer’s best interest in mind. Instead they are greedy and do not take the time to test the security of their product. Therefore you must acquire this whole industry as the government’s property to punish the manufacturer's avarice.”
Outcome: “We didn’t need that industry anyway” say many CEOs
Option #4
As the situation in the room, as was expected, devolves into a total brawl, you are approached by a masked guy in a black hooded sweater. “Consider the crashes and jackings a portfolio of mine” the figure mumbles in a voice that is somehow artificially distorted. “I go by the name of Neon and am proud to have proved that any car with that system can be remotely hacked and disabled. Now, picture the possibilities for my talents. Distribute enough of those alarm systems and I can “deal” with any problem you might have. Political opponent? I stop their car and lock them inside over railroad tracks. So... whadda ya say?”
Outcome: The new Government cyber “security” force calls black hoodies and a mask their uniform
After a string of mysterious car crashes and carjackings in @@Your nation@@, investigators have discovered that they were all caused by remote devices hacking into aftermarket “smart” car alarms installed on every automobile in question. These car alarms were easy to hack and gave hackers the ability to unlock doors, apply the brakes, and even stall the engine of the car they were installed in. Now a mob of angry soccer moms, car alarm CEOs, and random but equally opinionated bystanders have swarmed your office.
Option #1
“Imagine,” begins mini-van owning soccer mom,@@random female name@@, in what you just know will be a long winded speech by the way she sets her purse on your desk and adjusts her sweater. “I was dooped! Deceived. They told me the “smart alarm” would make my life easier and safer! I don’t know how I can drive now knowing that some nefarious creep might be plotting my demise at every turn, literally. You must make the businesses that manufacture these alarms pay for what they have done. They must recall their maniacal products and pay the poor saps who bought these life ending devices monetary compensation.”
Outcome: Buisnesses set more money aside for monetary compensation for their products than for the actual development of their products.
Option #2
Just as @@same random female name@@ is about to launch into the “think of the children” section of her monologue, she is dragged out by what seems to be the private security force of a smart dressed man. “@@random male name@@ here,” he begins after taking a seat in front of you and sitting a briefcase on your desk. “I work for Dodgeson & Ford attorneys at law. We represent the manufacturer of these remote automotive alarm system devices. To put it in layman’s terms, the company I represent isn’t, shouldn’t, and cannot be held responsible for the exploitation of this system flaw. My client’s only intention was to build a quality smart alarm system. The fact that it was easily hacked is not a liability on our end. For the sake of the continual promotion of capitalism we emplore you not to hold our client accountable.
Outcome: Anyone can do just about anything so long as they say it is “for the promotion of capitalism”
Option #3
“I have a solution!” wails @@random female name@@, a noteworthy communist, as she bounds into the room and lands atop your desk. ““This event, among many others, show that companies can’t be trusted to have the consumer’s best interest in mind. Instead they are greedy and do not take the time to test the security of their product. Therefore you must acquire this whole industry as the government’s property to punish the manufacturer's avarice.”
Outcome: “We didn’t need that industry anyway” say many CEOs
Option #4
As the situation in the room, as was expected, devolves into a total brawl, you are approached by a masked guy in a black hooded sweater. “Consider the crashes and jackings a portfolio of mine” the figure mumbles in a voice that is somehow artificially distorted. “I go by the name of Neon and am proud to have proved that any car with that system can be remotely hacked and disabled. Now, picture the possibilities for my talents. Distribute enough of those alarm systems and I can “deal” with any problem you might have. Political opponent? I stop their car and lock them inside over railroad tracks. So... whadda ya say?”
Outcome: The new Government cyber “security” force calls black hoodies and a mask their uniform
I am open to any and all feedback. Thanks!
The Premise:
Investigators have discovered that a series or motoring accidents and incidents were caused by remote devices hacking wireless car systems linked to the owners' phones. Hackers found they could unlock doors, apply brakes, and even stall engines.
Option #1
"Imagine," begins mini-van owning soccer mom,@@RANDOMFEMALE@@, as she adjusts her sweater. "I was dooped! Now I don’t know how I can feel safe driving with the knowledge that some nefarious creep might be plotting my demise at every turn. You must make the businesses that manufacture these alarms pay for what they have done by recalling their products and paying those who bought these devices monetary compensation."
Outcome: Businesses set more funds aside for monetary compensation than for the development of their products.
Option #2
"I have a better solution!" wails @@RANDOMFEMALE@@, a self proclaimed, "anti-capitalist", as she bounds into the room and lands atop your desk. "Regulations! This event shows that companies can’t be trusted to have their consumer’s safety in mind. Therfore we must impose strict cyber security regulations on this industry to insure that a horrible slip up like this never happens again. It will teach them that they can’t skip the safety tests."
Outcome: “We didn’t need that industry anyway” say CEOs after having their company bankrupted by safety regulations
Option #3
Just as she launches into a full on tirade, she is dragged out by the private security force of a smartly dressed man. After sitting a filled-to-burst briefcase on your desk he begins his own monologue. "I'll make this quick, my client, the creator of these fine aftermarket systems, shouldn’t be held responsible for a system flaw. My client’s only intention was to build a reliable and quality product. What are the actual odds of being hacked? My client has thousands of systems in public use and they don't all end up in a ditch."
Outcome: It can be hard to tell if the car's driver is the one on the wheel
Option #4
As the situation in the room, as was expected, devolves into a total brawl, you are approached by a hooded figure, whose face is shrouded in darkness. "Consider the crashes a portfolio of mine. I and am proud to have proved that any car with that system can be remotely hacked and disabled. Now, picture the possibilities for my talents. Distribute enough of those alarm systems and I can “deal” with any problem you might have."
Outcome: @@DEMONYM@@ "cyber security" force calls black hoodies their uniform
Requirements: You must have Capitalism in place. You can’t have banned automobiles
Investigators have discovered that a series or motoring accidents and incidents were caused by remote devices hacking wireless car systems linked to the owners' phones. Hackers found they could unlock doors, apply brakes, and even stall engines.
Option #1
"Imagine," begins mini-van owning soccer mom,@@RANDOMFEMALE@@, as she adjusts her sweater. "I was dooped! Now I don’t know how I can feel safe driving with the knowledge that some nefarious creep might be plotting my demise at every turn. You must make the businesses that manufacture these alarms pay for what they have done by recalling their products and paying those who bought these devices monetary compensation."
Outcome: Businesses set more funds aside for monetary compensation than for the development of their products.
Option #2
"I have a better solution!" wails @@RANDOMFEMALE@@, a self proclaimed, "anti-capitalist", as she bounds into the room and lands atop your desk. "Regulations! This event shows that companies can’t be trusted to have their consumer’s safety in mind. Therfore we must impose strict cyber security regulations on this industry to insure that a horrible slip up like this never happens again. It will teach them that they can’t skip the safety tests."
Outcome: “We didn’t need that industry anyway” say CEOs after having their company bankrupted by safety regulations
Option #3
Just as she launches into a full on tirade, she is dragged out by the private security force of a smartly dressed man. After sitting a filled-to-burst briefcase on your desk he begins his own monologue. "I'll make this quick, my client, the creator of these fine aftermarket systems, shouldn’t be held responsible for a system flaw. My client’s only intention was to build a reliable and quality product. What are the actual odds of being hacked? My client has thousands of systems in public use and they don't all end up in a ditch."
Outcome: It can be hard to tell if the car's driver is the one on the wheel
Option #4
As the situation in the room, as was expected, devolves into a total brawl, you are approached by a hooded figure, whose face is shrouded in darkness. "Consider the crashes a portfolio of mine. I and am proud to have proved that any car with that system can be remotely hacked and disabled. Now, picture the possibilities for my talents. Distribute enough of those alarm systems and I can “deal” with any problem you might have."
Outcome: @@DEMONYM@@ "cyber security" force calls black hoodies their uniform
Requirements: You must have Capitalism in place. You can’t have banned automobiles