by Republica de Los Grandes » Mon May 06, 2019 6:00 pm
by Separatist Peoples » Mon May 06, 2019 6:02 pm
by Israeli Commonwealth » Mon May 06, 2019 6:04 pm
Republica de Los Grandes wrote:I have been granted the ability to modify and publish Repeal: "Reproductive Freedoms" by the original author. I would appreciate any advice on the legality of the draft. The following is the draft:
The General Assembly,
Mindful of the sensitive, controversial, and wide-reaching issue of reproductive rights,
Deeply disturbed that GAR#286 prohibits member nations to make provisions disallowing the discriminatory and unethical practice of sex-selective abortion- a procedure which undermines gender equality and contributes to detrimental demographic disparities,
Deploring that the ad rem resolution proscribes the enactment of critical legislation aimed to outlaw the egregious practice of eugenic abortion- a practice defined as the purification of a population from undesirable characteristics- as it exacerbates social inequality, undermines the legitimacy of disabled persons, poses a direct threat to diversity, and constitutes a serious ethical dilemma among many member nations,
Cognizant that GAR#286 permits the termination of a pregnancy at any moment until birthing, regardless of fetus viability, which propounds consequential, bona fide ethical concerns to member states,
Concerned that GAR#286 fails to account for a fetus’s capacity to feel pain, and fails to address, even remotely, such a grave ethical quandary whilst allowing the termination of pregnancy without limitation,
Recalling, but not relying upon, the extant resolution, GAR #128, which in the event of GAR#286 nullification and at the time of writing, would continue to license termination of pregnancy to the most vulnerable of pregnant persons undergoing gestation, such as victims of involuntary sexual activity, incest, and pregnant persons with “risk of a life-threatening physical or mental condition which would result in death or life-long severe disability” as a result of undergoing pregnancy and/or birthing,
Hoping for a more refined and sensible approach to reproductive rights,
Hereby repeals GAR#286, "Reproductive Freedoms”.
by Gebietersland » Mon May 06, 2019 6:07 pm
by Separatist Peoples » Mon May 06, 2019 6:08 pm
Israeli Commonwealth wrote:Republica de Los Grandes wrote:I have been granted the ability to modify and publish Repeal: "Reproductive Freedoms" by the original author. I would appreciate any advice on the legality of the draft. The following is the draft:
The General Assembly,
Mindful of the sensitive, controversial, and wide-reaching issue of reproductive rights,
Deeply disturbed that GAR#286 prohibits member nations to make provisions disallowing the discriminatory and unethical practice of sex-selective abortion- a procedure which undermines gender equality and contributes to detrimental demographic disparities,
Deploring that the ad rem resolution proscribes the enactment of critical legislation aimed to outlaw the egregious practice of eugenic abortion- a practice defined as the purification of a population from undesirable characteristics- as it exacerbates social inequality, undermines the legitimacy of disabled persons, poses a direct threat to diversity, and constitutes a serious ethical dilemma among many member nations,
Cognizant that GAR#286 permits the termination of a pregnancy at any moment until birthing, regardless of fetus viability, which propounds consequential, bona fide ethical concerns to member states,
Concerned that GAR#286 fails to account for a fetus’s capacity to feel pain, and fails to address, even remotely, such a grave ethical quandary whilst allowing the termination of pregnancy without limitation,
Recalling, but not relying upon, the extant resolution, GAR #128, which in the event of GAR#286 nullification and at the time of writing, would continue to license termination of pregnancy to the most vulnerable of pregnant persons undergoing gestation, such as victims of involuntary sexual activity, incest, and pregnant persons with “risk of a life-threatening physical or mental condition which would result in death or life-long severe disability” as a result of undergoing pregnancy and/or birthing,
Hoping for a more refined and sensible approach to reproductive rights,
Hereby repeals GAR#286, "Reproductive Freedoms”.
I would support this
by Dontriptia » Mon May 06, 2019 6:17 pm
by Arentium » Mon May 06, 2019 6:19 pm
Israeli Commonwealth wrote:Republica de Los Grandes wrote:I have been granted the ability to modify and publish Repeal: "Reproductive Freedoms" by the original author. I would appreciate any advice on the legality of the draft. The following is the draft:
The General Assembly,
Mindful of the sensitive, controversial, and wide-reaching issue of reproductive rights,
Deeply disturbed that GAR#286 prohibits member nations to make provisions disallowing the discriminatory and unethical practice of sex-selective abortion- a procedure which undermines gender equality and contributes to detrimental demographic disparities,
Deploring that the ad rem resolution proscribes the enactment of critical legislation aimed to outlaw the egregious practice of eugenic abortion- a practice defined as the purification of a population from undesirable characteristics- as it exacerbates social inequality, undermines the legitimacy of disabled persons, poses a direct threat to diversity, and constitutes a serious ethical dilemma among many member nations,
Cognizant that GAR#286 permits the termination of a pregnancy at any moment until birthing, regardless of fetus viability, which propounds consequential, bona fide ethical concerns to member states,
Concerned that GAR#286 fails to account for a fetus’s capacity to feel pain, and fails to address, even remotely, such a grave ethical quandary whilst allowing the termination of pregnancy without limitation,
Recalling, but not relying upon, the extant resolution, GAR #128, which in the event of GAR#286 nullification and at the time of writing, would continue to license termination of pregnancy to the most vulnerable of pregnant persons undergoing gestation, such as victims of involuntary sexual activity, incest, and pregnant persons with “risk of a life-threatening physical or mental condition which would result in death or life-long severe disability” as a result of undergoing pregnancy and/or birthing,
Hoping for a more refined and sensible approach to reproductive rights,
Hereby repeals GAR#286, "Reproductive Freedoms”.
I would support this
by Israeli Commonwealth » Mon May 06, 2019 6:22 pm
Dontriptia wrote:Republica de Los Grandes wrote:I have been granted the ability to modify and publish Repeal: "Reproductive Freedoms" by the original author. I would appreciate any advice on the legality of the draft. The following is the draft:
The General Assembly,
Mindful of the sensitive, controversial, and wide-reaching issue of reproductive rights,
Deeply disturbed that GAR#286 prohibits member nations to make provisions disallowing the discriminatory and unethical practice of sex-selective abortion- a procedure which undermines gender equality and contributes to detrimental demographic disparities,
Deploring that the ad rem resolution proscribes the enactment of critical legislation aimed to outlaw the egregious practice of eugenic abortion- a practice defined as the purification of a population from undesirable characteristics- as it exacerbates social inequality, undermines the legitimacy of disabled persons, poses a direct threat to diversity, and constitutes a serious ethical dilemma among many member nations,
Cognizant that GAR#286 permits the termination of a pregnancy at any moment until birthing, regardless of fetus viability, which propounds consequential, bona fide ethical concerns to member states,
Concerned that GAR#286 fails to account for a fetus’s capacity to feel pain, and fails to address, even remotely, such a grave ethical quandary whilst allowing the termination of pregnancy without limitation,
Recalling, but not relying upon, the extant resolution, GAR #128, which in the event of GAR#286 nullification and at the time of writing, would continue to license termination of pregnancy to the most vulnerable of pregnant persons undergoing gestation, such as victims of involuntary sexual activity, incest, and pregnant persons with “risk of a life-threatening physical or mental condition which would result in death or life-long severe disability” as a result of undergoing pregnancy and/or birthing,
Hoping for a more refined and sensible approach to reproductive rights,
Hereby repeals GAR#286, "Reproductive Freedoms”.
We strongly support this proposal.
OOC: Independently, without knowing that another proposal had been filed, I submitted my own repeal. While we touched on most of the same subjects, another important issue is the requirement in "Reproductive Freedoms" for nations to protect abortionists from "targeted animosity." This language is extremely broad and violates freedom of speech. Would you be open to including a clause mentioning that issue as well?
by The Unfounded » Mon May 06, 2019 6:28 pm
by The Candy Of Bottles » Mon May 06, 2019 6:35 pm
by Gebietersland » Mon May 06, 2019 6:43 pm
The Candy Of Bottles wrote:Repeal attempt #945...
by Dontriptia » Mon May 06, 2019 7:09 pm
by Sierra Lyricalia » Mon May 06, 2019 7:40 pm
The Candy Of Bottles wrote:Repeal attempt #945...
...Cannon to right of them,
Cannon to left of them,
Cannon behind them
Volleyed and thundered;
Stormed at with shot and shell,
While horse and hero fell.
They that had fought so well
Came through the jaws of Death,
Back from the mouth of hell,
All that was left of them,
Left of six hundred...
by The Candy Of Bottles » Mon May 06, 2019 7:45 pm
Sierra Lyricalia wrote:The Candy Of Bottles wrote:Repeal attempt #945...
OOC: I think the correct count is a bit less than that....Cannon to right of them,
Cannon to left of them,
Cannon behind them
Volleyed and thundered;
Stormed at with shot and shell,
While horse and hero fell.
They that had fought so well
Came through the jaws of Death,
Back from the mouth of hell,
All that was left of them,
Left of six hundred...
by Grug Island » Mon May 06, 2019 8:51 pm
by BlackLight Covenant » Mon May 06, 2019 10:47 pm
by Kenmoria » Mon May 06, 2019 11:29 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement