What do you have against her
Advertisement
by Telconi » Mon Apr 29, 2019 4:34 pm
by Major-Tom » Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:48 pm
by San Lumen » Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:29 pm
Shrillland wrote:The plaza expands again with another initiative in Washington.
Washington: Also on the ballot is Initiative 976. It was an initiative to the legislature drafted by Tim Eyman, an anti-tax conservative who's well known for referenda in Washington and in trouble for taking initiative campaign money and using it for himself, but the state legislature has adjourned for the season, so it's going to the voters. This proposal, if approved, will limit annual licence fees for all vehicles under the weight of 10,000 pounds to $30 unless approved by the voters, base all vehicle taxes on Kelley Blue Book values rather than MSRPs like now, repeal motorhome weight fees, repeal a 0.3% tax on new vehicles, get rid of some fees on electric vehicles, and repeal parts of SB 5987, passed in 2015, that allow Sound Transit(Seattle and Tacoma's transit authority) the right to levy motor vehicle excise taxes. Given this is an off-year and those tend to favour the more conservatively minded, I'll say this has a moderate chance of passing.
by Shrillland » Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:34 pm
San Lumen wrote:Shrillland wrote:The plaza expands again with another initiative in Washington.
Washington: Also on the ballot is Initiative 976. It was an initiative to the legislature drafted by Tim Eyman, an anti-tax conservative who's well known for referenda in Washington and in trouble for taking initiative campaign money and using it for himself, but the state legislature has adjourned for the season, so it's going to the voters. This proposal, if approved, will limit annual licence fees for all vehicles under the weight of 10,000 pounds to $30 unless approved by the voters, base all vehicle taxes on Kelley Blue Book values rather than MSRPs like now, repeal motorhome weight fees, repeal a 0.3% tax on new vehicles, get rid of some fees on electric vehicles, and repeal parts of SB 5987, passed in 2015, that allow Sound Transit(Seattle and Tacoma's transit authority) the right to levy motor vehicle excise taxes. Given this is an off-year and those tend to favour the more conservatively minded, I'll say this has a moderate chance of passing.
This doesn't sound like a good thing if I'm reading it correctly
by San Lumen » Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:40 pm
Shrillland wrote:San Lumen wrote:
This doesn't sound like a good thing if I'm reading it correctly
Oh, you're reading it correctly. Sound Transit's excise tax funds expanded ferry service across the islands of Puget Sound and to the mainland. It would also effectively kill ST3, a major project that was approved in 2015 to expand light rail, increase park n' ride spots, and increase bus routes. I didn't put that in the description for obvious reasons.
by Telconi » Tue Apr 30, 2019 11:35 am
Major-Tom wrote:Telconi wrote:
Her beliefs.
Oh c'mon, someone can be intellectual and have opposing beliefs. William F Buckley was a noted conservative figure, also recognized as an intellectual by all, including liberals such as myself.
Pressley is arguably a fairly smart, quick and thoughtful woman. I'd call her intellectual, or if not that, fairly smart and competent.
by Shrillland » Tue Apr 30, 2019 2:25 pm
by Myrensis » Tue Apr 30, 2019 6:27 pm
Outer Sparta wrote:Hakons wrote:
That would be horribly undemocratic. Electors vote how their state votes. I understand, say, wanting to have electors vote proportionally to the vote in the state, but having electors vote on how OTHER states vote is an undemocratic farse and maybe even unconstitutional.
States can allocate electoral votes however they want. Joining a pact to allocate electoral votes to the winner of the populate vote is constitutional. Even if they aren't gonna wait for the compact, they still are allocating electoral votes however they please.
by San Lumen » Tue Apr 30, 2019 6:42 pm
by Outer Sparta » Tue Apr 30, 2019 6:46 pm
Shrillland wrote:San Lumen wrote:
This doesn't sound like a good thing if I'm reading it correctly
Oh, you're reading it correctly. Sound Transit's excise tax funds expanded ferry service across the islands of Puget Sound and to the mainland. The proposal would also effectively kill ST3, a major project that was approved in 2015 to expand light rail, increase park n' ride spots, and increase bus routes. I didn't put that in the description for obvious reasons. As I mentioned Tim Eyman's as much of a big name in Washington state as Tom Steyer is in California, but Eyman's in a lot of trouble.
by San Lumen » Tue Apr 30, 2019 7:33 pm
by Outer Sparta » Tue Apr 30, 2019 8:01 pm
by Shrillland » Tue Apr 30, 2019 9:24 pm
by San Lumen » Tue Apr 30, 2019 10:05 pm
Shrillland wrote:As for the big race of the night in Jacksonville-Outer Banks, it went as expected. Allan Thomas won the Democratic primary with 50% of the vote, while the Republican primary was No Overall Plurality. Greg Murphy will go against Joan Perry on July 9. Lumen's covered Saturday fairly well, so here's my take on Tuesday.
State legislatures: Only one byelection this week, Connecticut's HD-130(Bridgeport Central). This is a fairly safe Democratic district who's Representative, Ezequiel Santiago, died of a heart attack back in March. I expect no change here.
Cities: We start off in Indianapolis, where mayoral primaries are taking place on the GOP side. Current Democratic Mayor Joe Hogsett is unopposed, and on the Republican side, I think that State Senator and Marion County GOP Chair Jim Merritt will take it.
Our next stop is Denver, with a mayoral vote and two fairly interesting referenda that are being monitored on the national level. Denver has a nonpartisan vote, but incumbent and likely winner Michael Hancock is a well-known Democrat.
But it's the ballot initiatives that are more important in Denver. I don't usually mention initiatives on the local level, but as I said, they are being monitored nationwide as a potential sign of the times. First, we've got Initiated Ordinance 300. This will add a 'Right to Survive in Public Places" section to the municipal code, which would legalise resting, sheltering oneself, eating or exchanging food, and occupying one's legally parked vehicle without any penalty. Effectively, it would allow homeless people to do these things without fear of being removed. Knowing Denver, this one could pass.
Next, we have Initiated Ordinance 301. This is seen by some as the next step in the normalisation of drugs since it would decriminalise psilocybin mushrooms(magic mushrooms) in the city and county of Denver. I think this one could pass as well.
by Shrillland » Wed May 01, 2019 3:04 pm
by Telconi » Wed May 01, 2019 6:04 pm
Shrillland wrote:The plaza expands again, this time to Texas.
Texas: This proposal would amend the constitution to allow law enforcement animals, upon their retirement, to be given to their handlers or other qualified caretakers if it's in the animals best interest. Currently, police dogs and horses and the like are classified as salvage and have to be either auctioned, donated to a charity, or put down. This would add giving them to their handlers as an option. A reasonable proposal, and one I think will pass.
by Myrensis » Wed May 01, 2019 6:16 pm
Shrillland wrote:The plaza expands again, this time to Texas.
Texas: This proposal would amend the constitution to allow law enforcement animals, upon their retirement, to be given to their handlers or other qualified caretakers if it's in the animals best interest. Currently, police dogs and horses and the like are classified as salvage and have to be either auctioned, donated to a charity, or put down. This would add giving them to their handlers as an option. A reasonable proposal, and one I think will pass.
by Shrillland » Wed May 01, 2019 6:21 pm
Myrensis wrote:Shrillland wrote:The plaza expands again, this time to Texas.
Texas: This proposal would amend the constitution to allow law enforcement animals, upon their retirement, to be given to their handlers or other qualified caretakers if it's in the animals best interest. Currently, police dogs and horses and the like are classified as salvage and have to be either auctioned, donated to a charity, or put down. This would add giving them to their handlers as an option. A reasonable proposal, and one I think will pass.
While it seems odd that this wasn't an option to begin with, I'm more confused about why it would require a Constitutional amendment as opposed to just a policy change.
by San Lumen » Wed May 01, 2019 9:02 pm
Shrillland wrote:Myrensis wrote:
While it seems odd that this wasn't an option to begin with, I'm more confused about why it would require a Constitutional amendment as opposed to just a policy change.
Because, technically speaking, it requires amending the state's Local Governments Code, and the Texas Constitution has very strict requirements on what the legislature can do to that code. This amendment would let the legislature authorize cities and counties to let animals go to their handlers. Texas has one of the largest constitutions among the states, only the infamous Alabama Constitution and Micromanaging Clusterfuck is larger.
by Shrillland » Thu May 02, 2019 11:13 am
San Lumen wrote:Shrillland wrote:
Because, technically speaking, it requires amending the state's Local Governments Code, and the Texas Constitution has very strict requirements on what the legislature can do to that code. This amendment would let the legislature authorize cities and counties to let animals go to their handlers. Texas has one of the largest constitutions among the states, only the infamous Alabama Constitution and Micromanaging Clusterfuck is larger.
The Alabama Constitution is the longest governing document in the world. Many amendments deal with local matters as Alabama counties have very little self governing power.
Why they dont have a constitutional convention to rewrite the constitution is beyond me.
by San Lumen » Thu May 02, 2019 1:28 pm
Shrillland wrote:San Lumen wrote:The Alabama Constitution is the longest governing document in the world. Many amendments deal with local matters as Alabama counties have very little self governing power.
Why they dont have a constitutional convention to rewrite the constitution is beyond me.
Too many Conservative groups are opposed to it because it would mean streamlining and potentially raising taxation.
by Shrillland » Thu May 02, 2019 1:31 pm
by Telconi » Thu May 02, 2019 1:32 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Bormiar, Cyptopir, Eahland, Elejamie, Kostane, Plan Neonie, Sarduri, Tungstan
Advertisement