Risottia wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:Pretty simple way to start would be setting a close deadline for compliance, any corporations or elites found to be non-compliant after that stage get on the shitlist and are told their wealth is ephemeral and will be totally and completely confiscated so they are left with nothing but their debts when the people who take environmentalism seriously take over. Use that policy as a litmus test for environmentalism, and don't support those who don't have it.
And these policies make "environmentalists" so much more likely to get elected to a position of any power.
I think you underestimate outgrouping dynamics. They can't ignore you and your demands if you're actively rallying society to consider them the outgroup and hold their rights in contempt, and for environmentalsim they can't cry and claim you're being hateful and mean to polluters. It's also a matter of shifting the overton window and the centrist position.
There's "Let's do nothing" "Let's do enough." and the result is "Let's do not enough.".
Shifting that to;
"Let's do nothing" and "Let's fix it and get vengeance against those who broke it." and the result will be "How about we fix it."
The republican party strategy.
610 MPs didn't turn up because they see no reason to.
If doing that cedes time to a group using parliament to call for asset forfeiture and the civil death penalty for traitors to the species and this is framed as the mainstream environmental position, they'll turn up to oppose that.