*** Warned for trolling ***
Advertisement
by Farnhamia » Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:18 pm
by Kingdom Of Hungaria » Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:19 pm
The Mercurians of Hermes wrote:Kingdom Of Hungaria wrote:
Any kind of mental disorder can be fixed. You just need to put aside morality, besides a lobotomy can cure them just as good.
Stop trying to get hot takes, what's wrong with accepting people. Does it hurt you? There are two BIOLOGICAL sexes. gender=/=sex. being in between, nonbinary, isn't biological, like a sex, it's mental, like a gender.
by Kingdom Of Hungaria » Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:19 pm
by Farnhamia » Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:26 pm
Kingdom Of Hungaria wrote:The Mercurians of Hermes wrote:Stop trying to get hot takes, what's wrong with accepting people. Does it hurt you? There are two BIOLOGICAL sexes. gender=/=sex. being in between, nonbinary, isn't biological, like a sex, it's mental, like a gender.
Mental Retardation, possibly. Those genders are completely made up by lunatics who wish to stand out just a little bit.
by Kingdom Of Hungaria » Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:28 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Kingdom Of Hungaria wrote:
Mental Retardation, possibly. Those genders are completely made up by lunatics who wish to stand out just a little bit.
*** Warned for trolling. ***
And please don't try the "It's my opinion" defense. You're entitled to your opinion as long as you express it in a civil manner. Calling transgender people mentally retarded (a term not much used these days) and lunatics and recommending they be lobotomized, is not civil discourse.
by The Mercurians of Hermes » Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:28 pm
by Kingdom Of Hungaria » Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:29 pm
by The Mercurians of Hermes » Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:30 pm
That's actually not an opinion. that's a lie. Truth isn't a democracy. stop using the card says moops strategy.Kingdom Of Hungaria wrote:Farnhamia wrote:*** Warned for trolling. ***
And please don't try the "It's my opinion" defense. You're entitled to your opinion as long as you express it in a civil manner. Calling transgender people mentally retarded (a term not much used these days) and lunatics and recommending they be lobotomized, is not civil discourse.
Sorry.....*subhuman would be more appropriate
by The Mercurians of Hermes » Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:37 pm
Germanyt wrote:The Mercurians of Hermes wrote:Why would they fucking wanna stand out??? Do you think gender dysphoria is a joke? People can be driven to commit suicide from bullies like you. Go turn that hate into love, or you're not welcome here.
Yelling isnt going to help people think you are rational or stable.
by West Leas Oros 2 » Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:40 pm
Kingdom Of Hungaria wrote:Pogo booga
WLO Public News: Outdated Factbooks and other documents in process of major redesign! ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: <error:not found>
by Neutraligon » Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:44 pm
Kingdom Of Hungaria wrote:Farnhamia wrote:*** Warned for trolling. ***
And please don't try the "It's my opinion" defense. You're entitled to your opinion as long as you express it in a civil manner. Calling transgender people mentally retarded (a term not much used these days) and lunatics and recommending they be lobotomized, is not civil discourse.
Sorry.....*subhuman would be more appropriate
by Nilrahrarfan » Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:51 pm
by Reichsstaaten von Germania » Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:52 pm
Nilrahrarfan wrote:There are hundreds of "genders" that are just there to clog up the gender system, and may actually cause harm to actual transgenders. We need to help the transgenders by recognizing that fake genders will just hurt the real trans people, just as much as the Soviets hurt trans people.
by Farnhamia » Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:55 pm
Reichsstaaten von Germania wrote:Nilrahrarfan wrote:There are hundreds of "genders" that are just there to clog up the gender system, and may actually cause harm to actual transgenders. We need to help the transgenders by recognizing that fake genders will just hurt the real trans people, just as much as the Soviets hurt trans people.
True
by Khasinkonia » Tue Feb 12, 2019 1:31 pm
by Threlizdun » Tue Feb 12, 2019 3:11 pm
Nilrahrarfan wrote:There are hundreds of "genders" that are just there to clog up the gender system, and may actually cause harm to actual transgenders. We need to help the transgenders by recognizing that fake genders will just hurt the real trans people, just as much as the Soviets hurt trans people.
Years ago I sometimes got sad that I would never have periods because it made me feel like "less of a woman", but I've since recognized that having a menstrual cycle is not some vital component of femininity, and that not having them doesn't make me any less of a woman.Khasinkonia wrote:Well, that was quick. Now, shall we move from that blood-boiling topic to one that’s more plain bloody?
Fellow trans girls, what do y’all think about periods? Do y’all experience period envy, and, if so, it genuinely the period itself or more the implications of having a period(womb, fertility, etc)?
by Dumb Ideologies » Tue Feb 12, 2019 3:25 pm
Hediacrana wrote:Dumb Ideologies wrote:There's a categorical difference and differences of experience between people who transition due to a pressing and extended struggle of bodily discomfort and those who do so for purely lifestyle reasons. There's a difference again between people who wish to transition from one of the binary identities to another and those who wish to manufacture a third category.
Honestly this "truscum" and "transtrenders" vocab is a natural consequence of both society and "the movement" trying to lump together all "gender variant" people into one category, which is bound to be contentious because different experiences breed different priorities and worldviews.
I'm not sure you're responding to my post or to what came before, but I did not mean to say that all experiences are the same. I'd defend the claim that things are interlinked, that they share similarities, but not that they are identical.
And if the "the movement" thing in your post meant to refer to what I was just saying, it honestly feels a little like a bit of a strawman rebuttal, subsuming what I just said to a more generalizing argument that I did not make.
by Hanafuridake » Tue Feb 12, 2019 3:41 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:My experience of gender identity has been very much related to dysphoria and the body. The idea of "gender as drag" and performance isn't only literally the worst language they could possibly choose, but it's entirely alien to me. When people start talking about this being "the community's" theory of gender I feel like a faction of people who have very different life experiences to me are pushing a theory that's both wrong and politically functions to erode support for state-funded treatment. Queer theorists and moral crusaders of the religious or TERF flavour are, to me, uncomfortably close on a gender theory horseshoe.
Suriyanakhon's alt, finally found my old account's password李贽 wrote:There is nothing difficult about becoming a sage, and nothing false about transcending the world of appearances.
by Threlizdun » Tue Feb 12, 2019 3:56 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Hediacrana wrote:
I'm not sure you're responding to my post or to what came before, but I did not mean to say that all experiences are the same. I'd defend the claim that things are interlinked, that they share similarities, but not that they are identical.
And if the "the movement" thing in your post meant to refer to what I was just saying, it honestly feels a little like a bit of a strawman rebuttal, subsuming what I just said to a more generalizing argument that I did not make.
Not responding directly to you, but generally on the idea of "truscum".
My point is that when people talk about "truscum" or "trenders" it's usually a rhetorical move, putting forward a sockpuppet character that people are then challenged to disassociate themselves from. These groups are vanishingly small in actually-existing "pure" form, so talking about them is usually about trying to create a binary of "agree with my position" or "be one of THEM". In reality we all have a wide variety of opinions on what gender is, what the transition pathway should look like, what needs to change socially etc.
I'll give myself as an example - as a treat you can have my undiluted views, meme-free, for one night only
I'm binary. I think the people who waffle on online about a gender identity that's several lines long in description or that contains elements that having nothing to do with gender are a very small section of the community, and one that can be fairly disparaged without it becoming a slippery slope in which anyone who isn't binary gets chased by giant erasers.
I don't like queer theory and notions of performative gender. These ideas have largely been formulated and pushed by dysphoria-free and largely middle-class university-educated post-Foucaudlian libertarians who will never need to personally access a public healthcare system for treatment due to the nature of their identity. I think that this, as well as resentment towards the transsexuals who have historically dominated the "T" section of the community, is actually a big factor in why they argue what they do; to the point that it can't be analytically ignored without losing something in the analysis.
My experience of gender identity has been very much related to dysphoria and the body. The idea of "gender as drag" and performance isn't only literally the worst language they could possibly choose, but it's entirely alien to me. When people start talking about this being "the community's" theory of gender I feel like a faction of people who have very different life experiences to me are pushing a theory that's both wrong and politically functions to erode support for state-funded treatment. Queer theorists and moral crusaders of the religious or TERF flavour are, to me, uncomfortably close on a gender theory horseshoe. I actually mind these people a lot more than I mind outright transphobes to be honest, because at least those are simple and you can talk with everything on the table. With the queer theorists I'm unsure whether it's a case of them being so self-centred and smug that they genuinely think their club-handed bungle of an intervention into the debate is in our best interest and that we transitioners/SUBMITTERS TO BIOPOWER just don't understand ourselves, or they're slippery enough to tell a very very big lie with the active intention of fucking people over. At the same time, a lot of the people who don't have dysphoria either aren't political or don't hold to that view, and I'm fine with them. Queer theorists are generally non-dysphoric, but most non-dysphoric trans people aren't queer theorists.
Similarly, I would describe my politics as - though, yeah, it's problematic - somewhat conservative. My history has been one where I've transitioned partly to fit in better with wider society, and as a collectivist rather than an individualist I think society is about compromise and change is best achieved through wider societal dialogue and, yes, trying to be a respectable and respectful as possible. So while I have no problem whatsoever with non-binary people, I'm not going to use pronouns beyond "they" because creating a novel pronoun and trying to force it into the language when there's a perfectly serviceable neutral pronoun available feels to me like bordering on narcissistic in its extreme individualistic position on the relationship between individual and society. I can't honestly sign up to that.
This is a combination of views that has got the label thrown in my direction on occasion elsewhere, but it's pretty far from the straw "truscumite". I feel like a lot of the snarls, whether "truscum" or "trender", emanate from natural disagreements based on different experiences, high tensions on issues relating to fundamental identity, and the impossible pressure to ignore difference when subgroups are always going to be trying to grab the wheel to steer it towards their own personal interests and politics, as is life.
by Khasinkonia » Tue Feb 12, 2019 4:01 pm
Hanafuridake wrote:Dumb Ideologies wrote:My experience of gender identity has been very much related to dysphoria and the body. The idea of "gender as drag" and performance isn't only literally the worst language they could possibly choose, but it's entirely alien to me. When people start talking about this being "the community's" theory of gender I feel like a faction of people who have very different life experiences to me are pushing a theory that's both wrong and politically functions to erode support for state-funded treatment. Queer theorists and moral crusaders of the religious or TERF flavour are, to me, uncomfortably close on a gender theory horseshoe.
That's an extremely spot on analysis, from my experience. It's really frustrating trying to explain to someone demanding gender abolition that, no, transitioning would not become irrelevant to me were gender roles to be destroyed. It's made even more infuriating when these gender critical folks are cisgender people who conform perfectly to the masculinity/femininity spectrum, but we receive condemnation for trying to fit in.
by Cekoviu » Tue Feb 12, 2019 5:30 pm
Kingdom Of Hungaria wrote:Khasinkonia wrote:It is inefficient to debate people over things which will not change. It is more efficient to accept people for things that do no harm which will not change, as futile debate is inefficient. Further, happiness increases productivity. I rest my case.
They can helped to fix their ailment, accepting these “genders” is just further driving a wedge between people as everyone strives to stand out, to me there are only 2 genders male and female.
by Western Vale Confederacy » Tue Feb 12, 2019 6:13 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ifreann, Ineva, Likhinia, Nanatsu no Tsuki, Plan Neonie, Statesburg, Sutalia
Advertisement