Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the US; you can't go around it. That's blatantly illegal.
Which shows how much of an asshole these guy is
Advertisement
by Internationalist Bastard » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:40 pm
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the US; you can't go around it. That's blatantly illegal.
by El-Amin Caliphate » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:40 pm
San Lumen wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Idc
The constitution fotbids establishing a religion or restricting the free exercise therof. It’s in the first amendment
Riddle me this what do you think of same sex couples adopting? In some cases it’s the only family they have ever known. A friend of mine was raised by two men
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by Free Arabian Nation » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:40 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:Sigh
Amun’s ideal form of government is a form of theocracy for each religion. The idea is that religious freedom would be preserved while allowing theocracy to exist
For clarification to those who haven’t discussed this with him prior
For more info, please read this.
by Trollzyn the Infinite » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:40 pm
by New haven america » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:41 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:In spite of the many times we’ve explained the plethora of freedom problems that arise even in your brand of it?
Like?San Lumen wrote:Firstly clergy cannot be forced to be preform same sex marriages. They have a legal
Right to refuse.
I like that.San Lumen wrote:A county or city clerk is a government employee they do not have the right to impose their religious beliefs on others
They aren't. They are enforcing religious law on those whose religion or lack thereof forbids or allows it. They aren't enforcing their own religion on people.
by El-Amin Caliphate » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:41 pm
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by San Lumen » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:41 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:San Lumen wrote:The constitution fotbids establishing a religion or restricting the free exercise therof. It’s in the first amendment
Riddle me this what do you think of same sex couples adopting? In some cases it’s the only family they have ever known. A friend of mine was raised by two men
Same thing as I said about this.
by Trollzyn the Infinite » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:42 pm
by El-Amin Caliphate » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:43 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:I believe that if this should be passed, it should only apply to those whose religion forbids homosexual acts. Others whose religion or lack thereof doesn't forbid homosexuality can do it.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by New haven america » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:43 pm
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:Andsed wrote:You should. Your religion does not trump peoples rights to get married and the government should not be forcing people to follow any part of their religion if they don’t want to follow that part.
Ignore him, he's a theocrat. He doesn't care that we have our own secular laws and don't want Sharia Law ruining our country.
by Andsed » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:44 pm
[/quote]El-Amin Caliphate wrote:New haven america wrote:Yes they are.San Lumen wrote:Which is it shouldn’t be allowed?
Both of you please read this:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:What do you mean by somewhat agree? Do you mean you agree with the concept or what?
I believe that if this should be passed, it should only apply to those whose religion forbids homosexual acts. Others whose religion or lack thereof doesn't forbid homosexuality can do it.
by San Lumen » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:45 pm
[/quote]El-Amin Caliphate wrote:New haven america wrote:Yes they are.San Lumen wrote:Which is it shouldn’t be allowed?
Both of you please read this:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:What do you mean by somewhat agree? Do you mean you agree with the concept or what?
I believe that if this should be passed, it should only apply to those whose religion forbids homosexual acts. Others whose religion or lack thereof doesn't forbid homosexuality can do it.
by El-Amin Caliphate » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:47 pm
San Lumen wrote:I fail to see how you would enforce that.
San Lumen wrote:Religious beliefs was a argument used to justify bans on interracial marriage as well
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by Kannap » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:47 pm
San Lumen wrote:https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2019/02/08/tennessee-marriage-defense-act-would-ban-same-sex-marriage/2805983002/
A bill has been introduced into the Tennessee Legislature that would effectively ban same sex marriage.
The bill would prohibit government officials especially county clerks issuing marriage certificates from recognizing any court ruling that affirms same-sex unions, and specifies they cannot be arrested for failing to comply with court orders that do so.
The bills sponsor Rep Jerry Sexton(R) stated that the U.S. Supreme Court's 2015 decision to legalize same-sex marriage is void in Tennessee because the state has already passed its own law and constitutional amendment limiting marriage to one man and one woman. This is totally bogus argument as the decisions of the Supreme Court apply to every state.
The proposed law also requires the states Attorney General to defend the law in court. This same bill was introduced last session and failed to get any traction.
It appears this whole thing is attempt to get the issue back before the Supreme Court where the right hopes the court will rule there is no right for LGBT couples to marry or adopt. I don't see how this law would be upheld in court or by SCOTUS as the Obergefell decision which legalized same sex marriage and adoption nationwide was decided under the 14th amendment and you would have to somehow prove it doesnt apply to LGBT people.
Your thoughts NSG?
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
by Trollzyn the Infinite » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:48 pm
San Lumen wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:
Both of you please read this:
I believe that if this should be passed, it should only apply to those whose religion forbids homosexual acts. Others whose religion or lack thereof doesn't forbid homosexuality can do it.
I fail to see how you would enforce that. Religious beliefs was a argument used to justify bans on interracial marriage as well
by The Black Forrest » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:50 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:New haven america wrote:Yes they are.San Lumen wrote:Which is it shouldn’t be allowed?
Both of you please read this:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:I believe that if this should be passed, it should only apply to those whose religion forbids homosexual acts. Others whose religion or lack thereof doesn't forbid homosexuality can do it.
by El-Amin Caliphate » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:50 pm
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by El-Amin Caliphate » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:51 pm
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by Trollzyn the Infinite » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:51 pm
by The Black Forrest » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:52 pm
by Trollzyn the Infinite » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:52 pm
by El-Amin Caliphate » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:55 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:I guess asking. Or some kind of way to find someone's religious identification. I wanna say some kind of physical identification.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
by Andsed » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:57 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Andsed wrote:And how exactly do you plan on identifying peoples religion?El-Amin Caliphate wrote:I guess asking. Or some kind of way to find someone's religious identification. I wanna say some kind of physical identification.Andsed wrote:Also can you please address this:
What do you want me to say? It's an opinion.
by El-Amin Caliphate » Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:58 pm
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, Dauchh Palki, Statesburg, Zurkerx
Advertisement