Page wrote:There is nothing wrong with a Christian or a Muslim or a believer in whatever religion holding a position of power, but it is a real concern whether or not one is able to set aside their religious beliefs when legislating or ruling and base their decisions only on constitutional law.
I don't have a problem with believers, I have a problem with theocrats and dominionists.
Is it a "real concern" if someone with a strict philosophy can separate their views from their legislation or ruling, because it seems that you're suggesting the dirty religious people are always suspect while the proud, noble secularists are impartial and without and philosophical bias. If it is a "real question" if religious people can be neutral but not a a real question if secular people can be neutral, that is a textbook example of discrimination.