Proctopeo wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:Welcome to the world of President Rand Paul.
RON PAUL 2012
But the future refused to change.
Advertisement
by Northern Davincia » Thu Jan 03, 2019 5:33 pm
Proctopeo wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:Welcome to the world of President Rand Paul.
RON PAUL 2012
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by The South Falls » Thu Jan 03, 2019 5:35 pm
by Northern Davincia » Thu Jan 03, 2019 5:37 pm
The South Falls wrote:Yea, Gary Johnson is a complete idiot.
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Elwher » Fri Jan 04, 2019 7:20 am
by Phoenicaea » Fri Jan 04, 2019 8:15 am
by Northern Davincia » Sun Jan 06, 2019 2:47 pm
Phoenicaea wrote:..pardon, why would past candidate Johnson not be fine. this question is out of discussion, it is merely for historical scaffolds.
also, given the U.s.a features, shouldn t the libertarians seek, and manage, to rally other political fringes. the past election was the good election.
instead I saw other 'minors' and various radicals going nowhere, scattered, alone, without 'libertarian' candidacy making them a unite constituency.
that was the true occasion for libertarians, I wonder if there will be an other. In my country, different, still there is an historical party (which was namely center-left), has also ruined.
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by The Liberated Territories » Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:42 pm
Northern Davincia wrote:Phoenicaea wrote:..pardon, why would past candidate Johnson not be fine. this question is out of discussion, it is merely for historical scaffolds.
also, given the U.s.a features, shouldn t the libertarians seek, and manage, to rally other political fringes. the past election was the good election.
instead I saw other 'minors' and various radicals going nowhere, scattered, alone, without 'libertarian' candidacy making them a unite constituency.
that was the true occasion for libertarians, I wonder if there will be an other. In my country, different, still there is an historical party (which was namely center-left), has also ruined.
The Libertarian Party has no strong leadership, partly thanks to constant infighting about who is more libertarian than the next guy. The Reform Party had a better model for success because it didn't mandate ideological purity.
by Zurkerx » Thu Jan 10, 2019 9:25 am
The Liberated Territories wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:The Libertarian Party has no strong leadership, partly thanks to constant infighting about who is more libertarian than the next guy. The Reform Party had a better model for success because it didn't mandate ideological purity.
The Libertarian Party has been going strong for 50 years, while the Reform Party collapsed overnight after Perot, since it had no ideological consistency.
by The Isle of Beithe » Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:54 am
Zurkerx wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:
The Libertarian Party has been going strong for 50 years, while the Reform Party collapsed overnight after Perot, since it had no ideological consistency.
But would the LP then be at risk of never growing since there's constant infighting? Surely that's what happened to the Reform Party?
Head of State: President Ehrich W. Kemp | World Location: Australasia | Government Type: Constitutional democratic federation (official), meritocratic authoritarian democracy (unofficial)
by The Isle of Beithe » Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:58 am
Northern Davincia wrote:Phoenicaea wrote:..pardon, why would past candidate Johnson not be fine. this question is out of discussion, it is merely for historical scaffolds.
also, given the U.s.a features, shouldn t the libertarians seek, and manage, to rally other political fringes. the past election was the good election.
instead I saw other 'minors' and various radicals going nowhere, scattered, alone, without 'libertarian' candidacy making them a unite constituency.
that was the true occasion for libertarians, I wonder if there will be an other. In my country, different, still there is an historical party (which was namely center-left), has also ruined.
The Libertarian Party has no strong leadership, partly thanks to constant infighting about who is more libertarian than the next guy. The Reform Party had a better model for success because it didn't mandate ideological purity.
Head of State: President Ehrich W. Kemp | World Location: Australasia | Government Type: Constitutional democratic federation (official), meritocratic authoritarian democracy (unofficial)
by Free Arabian Nation » Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:20 am
Northern Davincia wrote:Phoenicaea wrote:..pardon, why would past candidate Johnson not be fine. this question is out of discussion, it is merely for historical scaffolds.
also, given the U.s.a features, shouldn t the libertarians seek, and manage, to rally other political fringes. the past election was the good election.
instead I saw other 'minors' and various radicals going nowhere, scattered, alone, without 'libertarian' candidacy making them a unite constituency.
that was the true occasion for libertarians, I wonder if there will be an other. In my country, different, still there is an historical party (which was namely center-left), has also ruined.
The Libertarian Party has no strong leadership
by Northern Davincia » Thu Jan 10, 2019 6:42 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:The Libertarian Party has no strong leadership, partly thanks to constant infighting about who is more libertarian than the next guy. The Reform Party had a better model for success because it didn't mandate ideological purity.
The Libertarian Party has been going strong for 50 years, while the Reform Party collapsed overnight after Perot, since it had no ideological consistency.
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Torrocca » Thu Jan 10, 2019 9:00 pm
Northern Davincia wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:
The Libertarian Party has been going strong for 50 years, while the Reform Party collapsed overnight after Perot, since it had no ideological consistency.
Since when have Libertarians posed an actual threat to the 2-party system? Perot did, we do not.Free Arabian Nation wrote:Of course there isn't, they're libertarians.
Our fate is an ironic one.
by Northern Davincia » Thu Jan 10, 2019 9:09 pm
Torrocca wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:Since when have Libertarians posed an actual threat to the 2-party system? Perot did, we do not.
Our fate is an ironic one.
It's even more hilariously ironic because half of you can't even unite against a common enemy (especially seeing as how some of you lean further left than others) and the other half of you are basically diet authoritarians. At least the libertarian left finds common ground in standing against the whole rest of the political compass depending on our moods lol
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."
by Nordengrund » Fri Jan 11, 2019 9:27 am
by West Leas Oros 2 » Fri Jan 11, 2019 9:36 am
Torrocca wrote:Northern Davincia wrote:Since when have Libertarians posed an actual threat to the 2-party system? Perot did, we do not.
Our fate is an ironic one.
It's even more hilariously ironic because half of you can't even unite against a common enemy (especially seeing as how some of you lean further left than others) and the other half of you are basically diet authoritarians. At least the libertarian left finds common ground in standing against the whole rest of the political compass depending on our moods lol
WLO Public News: Outdated Factbooks and other documents in process of major redesign! ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: <error:not found>
by Torrocca » Fri Jan 11, 2019 9:38 am
West Leas Oros 2 wrote:Torrocca wrote:
It's even more hilariously ironic because half of you can't even unite against a common enemy (especially seeing as how some of you lean further left than others) and the other half of you are basically diet authoritarians. At least the libertarian left finds common ground in standing against the whole rest of the political compass depending on our moods lol
That explains why lib leftist are always pretentious and yet never get anything done. :^)
by Frievolk » Fri Jan 11, 2019 9:41 am
♔ The Frievolker Empire || Frievolker Kaiserreik ♔
♔ The Realm in the Sun || De Reik in de Sonne ♔
♔ Led by Kaiser Johann, Part of the Erstwelt ♔
Never forget that the Muslims literally made up a new meaningless name for him when they forgot the name of Adam's Firstborn.
by Torrocca » Fri Jan 11, 2019 9:49 am
Frievolk wrote:Torrocca wrote:
Our camaraderie will be purer than your Trotskyist notions of revolution ever will be, at least. :^3
I'll be honest, the last time I took any High-Left rhetoric about revolution seriously was the day before a Marxist-Leninist unironically said "The only freedom is the freedom from choice."...
On this very platform.
by Autarkheia » Fri Jan 11, 2019 10:30 am
I admit that you used to get on my nerves a bit when I first joined, but now that I've interacted with the tankies here, I couldn't be happier you are here.Torrocca wrote:"Ours is a revolution for the people!" Cry the Leninist, the Stalinist, the Maoist, the Trotskyist, the Titoist, the Hoxhaist, and the Jucheist as they drive their daggers deeper into the hearts of the proletarians, again and again.
This forum, and Reddit, are infested with tankies. This is probably because tankies are losers with nothing better to do than post on the internet all day.Frievolk wrote:I'll be honest, the last time I took any High-Left rhetoric about revolution seriously was the day before a Marxist-Leninist unironically said "The only freedom is the freedom from choice."...
On this very platform.
by Torrocca » Fri Jan 11, 2019 10:32 am
Autarkheia wrote:I admit that you used to get on my nerves a bit when I first joined, but now that I've interacted with the tankies here, I couldn't be happier you are here.Torrocca wrote:"Ours is a revolution for the people!" Cry the Leninist, the Stalinist, the Maoist, the Trotskyist, the Titoist, the Hoxhaist, and the Jucheist as they drive their daggers deeper into the hearts of the proletarians, again and again.
by Autarkheia » Fri Jan 11, 2019 10:51 am
It's because if anarchists and liberals can agree on anything, it's that tankies are shit.Torrocca wrote:Either my charm or my shitposting wins everyone over eventually. And I'm all outta charm, so... :3
by Elwher » Fri Jan 11, 2019 10:54 am
by Torrocca » Fri Jan 11, 2019 10:58 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Cerespasia, Cerula, Cyptopir
Advertisement