Advertisement
by Wrapper » Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:12 pm
by Lord Dominator » Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:17 pm
Wrapper wrote:And yet, this is a World Assembly.
As always, it depends on context. For example, in the Siwale commendation that's been proposed, it's legal: "Recognizing the immense contributions Siwale has made to the world of NationStates." On the other hand, starting a proposal with "To the World Assembly" would be illegal.
by Wrapper » Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:19 pm
by Unibot III » Sun Nov 11, 2018 10:18 am
Wrapper wrote:On the other hand, starting a proposal with "To the World Assembly" would be illegal.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Wrapper » Sun Nov 11, 2018 10:27 am
Unibot III wrote:Wrapper wrote:On the other hand, starting a proposal with "To the World Assembly" would be illegal.
That’s a very strict interpretation of 4.D, no? I mean there’s a lot of variety in practice in the introduction clause, “to the WA,” or “The WA,” or Assembled Nations of the World (if you’re SP.)
by Unibot III » Sun Nov 11, 2018 1:30 pm
Wrapper wrote:Unibot III wrote:
That’s a very strict interpretation of 4.D, no? I mean there’s a lot of variety in practice in the introduction clause, “to the WA,” or “The WA,” or Assembled Nations of the World (if you’re SP.)
How can a proposal be from the point of view of the WA if it's addressed to the WA?
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Unibot III » Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:51 pm
Wrapper wrote:Forum and dispatch links are not allowed. Only links that are legal are the nation and region tags, and links to previous GA or SC resolutions, including repealed resolutions.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Bears Armed » Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:01 am
Unibot III wrote:Wrapper wrote:Forum and dispatch links are not allowed. Only links that are legal are the nation and region tags, and links to previous GA or SC resolutions, including repealed resolutions.
I'd just like to raise issue with this rules interpretation - not so much an issue so much as a request to reconsider it. Wrapper is completely right, of course, for years links have been found illegal except in cases where [nation], [region] tags or links to proposals. I do feel though this is a case where a narrow ruling has snowballed into a full-fledged, separate rule that lacks a justification.
by Lord Dominator » Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:12 am
by Unibot III » Fri Jan 11, 2019 4:52 pm
Bears Armed wrote:Unibot III wrote:
I'd just like to raise issue with this rules interpretation - not so much an issue so much as a request to reconsider it. Wrapper is completely right, of course, for years links have been found illegal except in cases where [nation], [region] tags or links to proposals. I do feel though this is a case where a narrow ruling has snowballed into a full-fledged, separate rule that lacks a justification.
Forum links could become useless gibberish in the event of another change of forums. Imagine if links to Jolt had been allowed...
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Oxes Republic » Mon Mar 25, 2019 5:48 pm
by Lord Dominator » Mon Mar 25, 2019 5:56 pm
Oxes Republic wrote:So can you mention in game activities like raiding in a Security Council Proposal?
by Third Asopia » Thu Mar 28, 2019 6:01 am
by Lenlyvit » Thu Mar 28, 2019 7:01 am
by Wrapper » Thu Mar 28, 2019 8:39 am
Third Asopia wrote:How long must a proposal be to be considered a proposal? And, is it okay if I base my commendation because of a particular topic only? (i.e. Contribution to SC ONLY)
by Wrapper » Thu Mar 28, 2019 8:48 am
Lenlyvit wrote:Is mention of region tags illegal under R4(c)?
by Third Asopia » Thu Mar 28, 2019 3:46 pm
Wrapper wrote:Third Asopia wrote:How long must a proposal be to be considered a proposal? And, is it okay if I base my commendation because of a particular topic only? (i.e. Contribution to SC ONLY)
There is no brevity limit from a legality standpoint but your proposal must be legal according to the proposal rules; e.g., it must have a unique and relevant argument, it must have an active clause, etc. That said, for commendations/condemnations, the less commend/condemn worthy material in your proposal, the less likely it will pass.
by Lenlyvit » Sun Mar 31, 2019 8:24 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Sun Mar 31, 2019 9:00 am
Lenlyvit wrote:In This Thread the op and Jocospor have admitted that the proposal is intended as an April Fools day joke proposal. I think that warrants an illegal ruling as a joke proposal right?
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Wrapper » Sun Mar 31, 2019 9:10 am
Bhang Bhang Duc wrote:Lenlyvit wrote:In This Thread the op and Jocospor have admitted that the proposal is intended as an April Fools day joke proposal. I think that warrants an illegal ruling as a joke proposal right?
Reading the appropriate section in the rules Compendium I think that only applies to Commendation/Condemnation proposals which are more likely to be flamey/trollish and therefore not acceptable.
Both Wrapper and Ransium have marked it legal so the content has been deemed acceptable, even if the intent is otherwise.
by United Massachusetts » Sun Mar 31, 2019 9:13 am
Lenlyvit wrote:In This Thread the op and Jocospor have admitted that the proposal is intended as an April Fools day joke proposal. I think that warrants an illegal ruling as a joke proposal right?
by Wrapper » Sun Mar 31, 2019 9:16 am
United Massachusetts wrote: I rule it fine.
by United Massachusetts » Sun Mar 31, 2019 9:24 am
by Wallenburg » Sun Mar 31, 2019 11:57 am
by Bormiar » Mon Dec 02, 2019 5:25 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: A Bloodred Moon, Muffinses
Advertisement