Advertisement
by Hippie Kiwis » Tue Nov 27, 2018 7:48 pm
by Teachian » Tue Nov 27, 2018 8:13 pm
Salus Maior wrote:Hitler and Kaiser Wilhelm hated each other, I think it's pretty clear by the fact that they did not restore the crown that they were not royalists.
by Anarcho-Fascist Japan » Tue Nov 27, 2018 9:22 pm
by Internationalist Bastard » Tue Nov 27, 2018 9:43 pm
by Bienenhalde » Tue Nov 27, 2018 10:01 pm
Anarcho-Fascist Japan wrote:Who would be the American monarch?
There is no one alive that would fit the job unless they descend from Lincoln or Washington
by Internationalist Bastard » Tue Nov 27, 2018 10:08 pm
Bienenhalde wrote:Anarcho-Fascist Japan wrote:Who would be the American monarch?
There is no one alive that would fit the job unless they descend from Lincoln or Washington
One idea would be to restore the United States to the British monarchy in a personal union, similar to the government of Canada. Alternately, after the revolution there was an unsuccessful plan to install a younger son of the King of Prussia as King of the USA.
by Salus Maior » Tue Nov 27, 2018 10:09 pm
Bienenhalde wrote:Anarcho-Fascist Japan wrote:Who would be the American monarch?
There is no one alive that would fit the job unless they descend from Lincoln or Washington
One idea would be to restore the United States to the British monarchy in a personal union, similar to the government of Canada. Alternately, after the revolution there was an unsuccessful plan to install a younger son of the King of Prussia as King of the USA.
Internationalist Bastard wrote:Wait really? I’d love a source for that for alt history reasons
by Autarkheia » Tue Nov 27, 2018 10:37 pm
Sure, but that was more for nationalistic reasons.Diopolis wrote:Autarkheia wrote:I'm confused how neo-Nazis could claim to be monarchists when Nazi Germany didn't have a monarchy, even a symbolic one. It would be easier to do what crypto-fascists always do and just claim to be a "nationalist", or even a "conservative".
Nazi Germany used many similar symbols to Imperial Germany, and protected seigneural rights.
by Internationalist Bastard » Tue Nov 27, 2018 10:39 pm
Salus Maior wrote:Bienenhalde wrote:
One idea would be to restore the United States to the British monarchy in a personal union, similar to the government of Canada. Alternately, after the revolution there was an unsuccessful plan to install a younger son of the King of Prussia as King of the USA.
There wasn't a plan, it was literally a suggestion that fell flat.Internationalist Bastard wrote:Wait really? I’d love a source for that for alt history reasons
This is probably the closest you'd get to any vision of it: https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/in ... r.1101469/
by Frievolk » Tue Nov 27, 2018 10:42 pm
Diopolis wrote:Autarkheia wrote:I'm confused how neo-Nazis could claim to be monarchists when Nazi Germany didn't have a monarchy, even a symbolic one. It would be easier to do what crypto-fascists always do and just claim to be a "nationalist", or even a "conservative".
Nazi Germany used many similar symbols to Imperial Germany, and protected seigneural rights.
♔ The Frievolker Empire || Frievolker Kaiserreik ♔
♔ The Realm in the Sun || De Reik in de Sonne ♔
♔ Led by Kaiser Johann, Part of the Erstwelt ♔
Never forget that the Muslims literally made up a new meaningless name for him when they forgot the name of Adam's Firstborn.
by Bienenhalde » Wed Nov 28, 2018 8:22 am
Internationalist Bastard wrote:Bienenhalde wrote:One idea would be to restore the United States to the British monarchy in a personal union, similar to the government of Canada. Alternately, after the revolution there was an unsuccessful plan to install a younger son of the King of Prussia as King of the USA.
Wait really? I’d love a source for that for alt history reasons
by Cursica » Wed Nov 28, 2018 8:26 am
by Hrythingia » Wed Nov 28, 2018 8:34 am
Cursica wrote:I am an Enlighten Absolutists. So It would've been nice if there was that distinction. I believe that, not just politically and ideologically am I oriented towards such belief but my religion as well. I believe that I always was one, never really agreed to democracy whatsoever.
by Cursica » Wed Nov 28, 2018 7:59 pm
Hrythingia wrote:Cursica wrote:I am an Enlighten Absolutists. So It would've been nice if there was that distinction. I believe that, not just politically and ideologically am I oriented towards such belief but my religion as well. I believe that I always was one, never really agreed to democracy whatsoever.
Nice grammar. Not really sure what you are trying to say here....
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Foxyshire, Ifreann, Inferior, Kannap, Oceasia, Ors Might, Pale Dawn, Port Carverton, Romanum et Britannia Minor, The Black Forrest
Advertisement