A tied resolution passes.
Advertisement
by Unibot III » Tue Nov 27, 2018 9:16 am
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Bears Armed » Tue Nov 27, 2018 10:59 am
by Unibot III » Tue Nov 27, 2018 11:06 am
Bears Armed wrote:Unibot III wrote:
Do we know this for sure?
Modly comment in the GA, some years ago, suggested that in the event of a tie a proposal would fail to pass, with "50% +1" being the required minimum of votes for passage -- as is common in RL voting on measures, after all. It seems likely that the GA and SC run on the same voting system.
Flibbleites wrote:Uh, you know, that's a good question.![]()
Flibbleites wrote:In this case, the latter, but considering how unlikely it would be for a vote to end up in a tie it could very well be that not even the admins would know what the outcome would be. I just might poke an admin and see what I can find out.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Eluvatar » Tue Nov 27, 2018 9:33 pm
by Unibot III » Tue Nov 27, 2018 9:36 pm
Eluvatar wrote:A wizened gnome emerges from under the Secretariat podium and leans toward a microphone. "A resolution with equal votes for and against fails," the gnome says, and disappears in a puff of logic.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement