I love it when we've done what we haven't done.
Advertisement
by Conserative Morality » Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:24 pm
by Tarsonis » Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:26 pm
by Conserative Morality » Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:27 pm
Tarsonis wrote:
The battle cry for this election was “shut down trumps agenda”. So when the democratic house refuses to pass any of Trumps agenda, and constantly floats the idea of impeaching him, how will the Democrats say they’re not doing exactly what the Republicans did?
by Petrasylvania » Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:27 pm
Tarsonis wrote:Valrifell wrote:
When Republicans do it, it's stopping the evil Socialists from getting control of government. When Democrats do it...
Well, shit, they haven't done it at all!
The battle cry for this election was “shut down trumps agenda”. So when the democratic house refuses to pass any of Trumps agenda, and constantly floats the idea of impeaching him, how will the Democrats say they’re not doing exactly what the Republicans did?
by Valrifell » Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:27 pm
Tarsonis wrote:Valrifell wrote:
When Republicans do it, it's stopping the evil Socialists from getting control of government. When Democrats do it...
Well, shit, they haven't done it at all!
The battle cry for this election was “shut down trumps agenda”. So when the democratic house refuses to pass any of Trumps agenda, and constantly floats the idea of impeaching him, how will the Democrats say they’re not doing exactly what the Republicans did?
by Len Hyet » Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:27 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
The battle cry for this election was “shut down trumps agenda”. So when the democratic house refuses to pass any of Trumps agenda, and constantly floats the idea of impeaching him, how will the Democrats say they’re not doing exactly what the Republicans did?
"When"
lol
by Tarsonis » Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:28 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
The battle cry for this election was “shut down trumps agenda”. So when the democratic house refuses to pass any of Trumps agenda, and constantly floats the idea of impeaching him, how will the Democrats say they’re not doing exactly what the Republicans did?
"When"
lol
by Tarsonis » Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:29 pm
Petrasylvania wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
The battle cry for this election was “shut down trumps agenda”. So when the democratic house refuses to pass any of Trumps agenda, and constantly floats the idea of impeaching him, how will the Democrats say they’re not doing exactly what the Republicans did?
Whatever works. :^]
by Petrasylvania » Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:31 pm
by Tarsonis » Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:31 pm
by Dahon » Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:38 pm
Tarsonis wrote:Valrifell wrote:
When Republicans do it, it's stopping the evil Socialists from getting control of government. When Democrats do it...
Well, shit, they haven't done it at all!
The battle cry for this election was “shut down trumps agenda”. So when the democratic house refuses to pass any of Trumps agenda, and constantly floats the idea of impeaching him, how will the Democrats say they’re not doing exactly what the Republicans did?
by Tarsonis » Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:40 pm
Dahon wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
The battle cry for this election was “shut down trumps agenda”. So when the democratic house refuses to pass any of Trumps agenda, and constantly floats the idea of impeaching him, how will the Democrats say they’re not doing exactly what the Republicans did?
If Trump were a reasonable man, if his cabinet weren't a vile collection of zealots and opportunists, working together with that White House would be feasible beyond military matters. But as it is? Fuck the dick.
by Conserative Morality » Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:40 pm
by Conserative Morality » Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:41 pm
Tarsonis wrote:Dahon wrote:
If Trump were a reasonable man, if his cabinet weren't a vile collection of zealots and opportunists, working together with that White House would be feasible beyond military matters. But as it is? Fuck the dick.
Remember kids obstructionism is only wrong when your political opponents do it. When you do it it’s justified.
by Pasong Tirad » Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:43 pm
by Petrasylvania » Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:44 pm
Tarsonis wrote:Dahon wrote:
If Trump were a reasonable man, if his cabinet weren't a vile collection of zealots and opportunists, working together with that White House would be feasible beyond military matters. But as it is? Fuck the dick.
Remember kids obstructionism is only wrong when your political opponents do it. When you do it it’s justified.
by Dahon » Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:47 pm
Tarsonis wrote:Dahon wrote:
If Trump were a reasonable man, if his cabinet weren't a vile collection of zealots and opportunists, working together with that White House would be feasible beyond military matters. But as it is? Fuck the dick.
Remember kids obstructionism is only wrong when your political opponents do it. When you do it it’s justified.
by Nouveau Yathrib » Thu Nov 08, 2018 9:08 pm
Are you a parent?
Yes (30%) 54% D 44% R 2% NA
No (70%) 55% D 43% R 2% NA
18778 Respondents
Children under 18
Only boys (11%) 59% D 39% R 2% NA
Only girls (8%) 54% D 45% R 1% NA
Both boys and girls (11%) 50% D 48% R 2% NA
No children under 18 (70%) 55% D 43% R 2% NA
18778 Respondents
In the U.S. today:
Whites are favored (41%) 87% D 11% R 2% NA
Minorities are favored (19%) 12% D 85% R 3% NA
No group is favored (33%) 29% D 69% R 2% NA
18778 Respondents
by NERVUN » Thu Nov 08, 2018 9:44 pm
Tarsonis wrote:Yeah I don’t actually give a shit about racial demographics. Shove your race baiting up your ass
by United Muscovite Nations » Thu Nov 08, 2018 9:59 pm
by United Muscovite Nations » Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:01 pm
Dahon wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
The battle cry for this election was “shut down trumps agenda”. So when the democratic house refuses to pass any of Trumps agenda, and constantly floats the idea of impeaching him, how will the Democrats say they’re not doing exactly what the Republicans did?
If Trump were a reasonable man, if his cabinet weren't a vile collection of zealots and opportunists, working together with that White House would be feasible beyond military matters. But as it is? Fuck the dick.
by Petrasylvania » Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:07 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Dahon wrote:
If Trump were a reasonable man, if his cabinet weren't a vile collection of zealots and opportunists, working together with that White House would be feasible beyond military matters. But as it is? Fuck the dick.
I find it odd you say you could work on them with military matters, but nothing else, as if military matters aren't the area where a President has the most ability to infringe on human rights.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Almighty Biden, Big Eyed Animation, Free Stalliongrad, Grinning Dragon, Hrstrovokia, Khardsland, Mutualist Chaos, Nu Elysium, The Two Jerseys, Valrifall
Advertisement