Ha! I don't have that problem.
Advertisement
by Oil exporting People » Mon Nov 05, 2018 9:12 pm
by Foryis » Mon Nov 05, 2018 9:16 pm
Internationalist Bastard wrote:Foryis wrote:
I"m willing to bet the female will abandon him.
My husband has one leg
I know an old couple married for years where the man was physically incapable of work for the majority of their marriage.
People are people, their ability to stick out for the people they love is not determined by gender
by Fartsniffage » Mon Nov 05, 2018 9:16 pm
Oil exporting People wrote:I'm still geeked at the fact we apparently need to send SWAT teams after Virgins and people unironically worship Eliot Rodgers.
by New haven america » Mon Nov 05, 2018 9:19 pm
by Oil exporting People » Mon Nov 05, 2018 9:20 pm
by Costa Fierro » Mon Nov 05, 2018 9:25 pm
by New haven america » Mon Nov 05, 2018 9:27 pm
by Foryis » Mon Nov 05, 2018 9:28 pm
New haven america wrote:Galloism wrote:I'll admit, that does surprise me.
Doesn't surprise me. (Especially on dating sites)
Younger women on those sites tend to be super judgmental/restrictive of who they date (Height requirements, salary requirements, etc...) and if you aren't able to pique their interest within the first few messages/sentences then you're most likely already out of their pool of options. Older women tend to not do that shit and are more open to different experiences/options.
by Oil exporting People » Mon Nov 05, 2018 9:29 pm
by Bombadil » Mon Nov 05, 2018 9:30 pm
Foryis wrote:New haven america wrote:Doesn't surprise me. (Especially on dating sites)
Younger women on those sites tend to be super judgmental/restrictive of who they date (Height requirements, salary requirements, etc...) and if you aren't able to pique their interest within the first few messages/sentences then you're most likely already out of their pool of options. Older women tend to not do that shit and are more open to different experiences/options.
So it would be better for men to aim for older women?
by Fartsniffage » Mon Nov 05, 2018 9:33 pm
by Fartsniffage » Mon Nov 05, 2018 9:42 pm
by United Muscovite Nations » Mon Nov 05, 2018 10:38 pm
Oil exporting People wrote:For some ideas on the overall issue, bring back arranged marriages.
by Costa Fierro » Mon Nov 05, 2018 10:39 pm
by Costa Fierro » Mon Nov 05, 2018 10:39 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Oil exporting People wrote:For some ideas on the overall issue, bring back arranged marriages.
This, but unironically.
by Thermodolia » Mon Nov 05, 2018 10:54 pm
by Petrasylvania » Mon Nov 05, 2018 11:00 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Kaggeceria wrote:I doubt that was Therm's intention. If you legitimately think Lindsay Graham is a closeted homosexual then fine.
But calling him gay is usually just used as a method to try and attack him.
He is gay. There’s nothing wrong with it and I like the guy a lot. Just wish he’d be a bit more open
by New haven america » Mon Nov 05, 2018 11:09 pm
by New haven america » Mon Nov 05, 2018 11:12 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Kaggeceria wrote:I doubt that was Therm's intention. If you legitimately think Lindsay Graham is a closeted homosexual then fine.
But calling him gay is usually just used as a method to try and attack him.
He is gay. There’s nothing wrong with it and I like the guy a lot. Just wish he’d be a bit more open
by Liriena » Mon Nov 05, 2018 11:13 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Liriena wrote:Ok, gotcha. You are just arguing for the possibility, and you are doing so purely in the interest of objectivity and science.
By the way, I'm still waiting on this:
https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcup ... ttractive/
Here's the 80%
For one, men on the site tend to be more generous than women when it comes to rating attractiveness, leading to a nice bell curve with the bulk of ratings falling around ‘average’. But despite their fair ratings, they tend to ignore many of the women they find reasonably attractive and primarily target the most attractive females.
And perhaps more telling: women don’t seem to be opposed to actually contacting these men that they’ve just deemed unattractive.
"As you can see from the gray line, women rate an incredible 80% of guys as worse-looking than medium. Very harsh. On the other hand, when it comes to actual messaging, women shift their expectations only just slightly ahead of the curve, which is a healthier pattern than guys’ pursuing the all-but-unattainable."
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Petrasylvania » Mon Nov 05, 2018 11:14 pm
New haven america wrote:Thermodolia wrote:He is gay. There’s nothing wrong with it and I like the guy a lot. Just wish he’d be a bit more open
He's an asshole though...
And yeah, he's part of a party that believes being gay is one of the main things destroying our society and is an abomination against nature, I'm sure admitting it will work out real well for him.
by Thermodolia » Mon Nov 05, 2018 11:15 pm
And yeah, he's part of a party that believes being gay is one of the main things destroying our society and is an abomination against nature, I'm sure admitting it will work out real well for him.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Aggicificicerous, Bienenhalde, Celritannia, Czechostan, Dimetrodon Empire, Google [Bot], Hurdergaryp, Kerwa, Kreushia, Lothria, Maximum Imperium Rex, Nu Elysium, Philjia, Port Carverton, Rodmenia, Tiami, Tungstan, Valyxias, Zwycistwo
Advertisement