NATION

PASSWORD

[DRAFT] Voting Opportunities for Prisoners

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
Calsolato
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Oct 17, 2018
Ex-Nation

[DRAFT] Voting Opportunities for Prisoners

Postby Calsolato » Sat Nov 03, 2018 9:37 am

Here is a General Assembly Proposition, tell me what you think of it.

The World Assembly,

The Opportunity and right to vote for a prisoner shall not be infringed upon and all current prisoners shall have the chance to vote.

The rights and restrictions to voting for prisoners shall be the same as any other citizen in regards to times and requirements such as age and citizenship status.

The definition and the qualifications to be considered a prisoner is:

a person legally held in a government or private facility/prison as a punishment for the crimes they have committed or while awaiting a trial.

Be it enacted by the world assembly as follows:

1. All prisoners rights to vote shall not be infringed upon while being detained in a government facility or private prison.

2. Each prisoner shall get to cast a ballot inside of a prison and all ballots shall be taken to an election center where the ballots shall be cast.

3. The time in which ballots are cast must be the same for prisoners as regular citizens.

4. A prisoner shall have the right to vote no matter what crime they have committed.
Last edited by Calsolato on Sat Nov 03, 2018 6:16 pm, edited 7 times in total.

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22870
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Sat Nov 03, 2018 10:04 am

"Very interesting. I must point out that clauses one and four seem to contradict one another. Also, definitions traditionally come before any active mandates."
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Kenmoria
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 7910
Founded: Jul 03, 2017
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Kenmoria » Sat Nov 03, 2018 10:39 am

“This doesn’t have any particular errors with regards to conforming with the rules of this assembly, but I find the content rather misguided. For example, with someone convicted of voting fraud or an extremely serious crime like mass murder, suffrage would most likely not be appropriate. There is also the fact that this appears rather restrictive on democracies, which seems hypocritical where there dictatorships in the WA.”
Hello! I’m a GAer and NS Roleplayer from the United Kingdom.
My pronouns are he/him.
Any posts that I make as GenSec will be clearly marked as such and OOC. Conversely, my IC ambassador in the General Assembly is Ambassador Fortier. I’m always happy to discuss ideas about proposals, particularly if grammar or wording are in issue. I am also Executive Deputy Minister for the WA Ministry of TNP.
Kenmoria is an illiberal yet democratic nation pursuing the goals of communism in a semi-effective fashion. It has a very broad diplomatic presence despite being economically developing, mainly to seek help in recovering from the effect of a recent civil war. Read the factbook here for more information; perhaps, I will eventually finish it.

User avatar
Calsolato
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Oct 17, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Calsolato » Sat Nov 03, 2018 5:18 pm

Wallenburg wrote:"Very interesting. I must point out that clauses one and four seem to contradict one another. Also, definitions traditionally come before any active mandates."

Fixed

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 16989
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Separatist Peoples » Sat Nov 03, 2018 5:23 pm

"Opposed. Criminals serving sentences are deprived of certain rights, sometimes out of necessity and other times as part of the punitive experience. In the C.D.S.P., prisoners are temporarily disenfranchised for the duration of their incarceration. For a politically active population, this is no small punishment. We oppose an attempt to reverse this policy."

His Worshipfulness, the Most Unscrupulous, Plainly Deceitful, Dissembling, Strategicly Calculating Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44956
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Sun Nov 04, 2018 1:00 am

Separatist Peoples wrote:"Opposed. Criminals serving sentences are deprived of certain rights, sometimes out of necessity and other times as part of the punitive experience. In the C.D.S.P., prisoners are temporarily disenfranchised for the duration of their incarceration. For a politically active population, this is no small punishment. We oppose an attempt to reverse this policy."

"May I remind you that certain...barbarian wastes have imprisonment for petty things like Jaywalking."

"What your bill needs are a list of crimes that can result in suffrage being lost and prohibiting it for everything else.
American History and Historiography; Political and Labour History, Urbanism, Political Parties, Congressional Procedure, Elections.

Servant of The Democracy since 1896.



Effortposts can be found here!

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 16989
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Separatist Peoples » Sun Nov 04, 2018 6:31 am

Kowani wrote:
Separatist Peoples wrote:"Opposed. Criminals serving sentences are deprived of certain rights, sometimes out of necessity and other times as part of the punitive experience. In the C.D.S.P., prisoners are temporarily disenfranchised for the duration of their incarceration. For a politically active population, this is no small punishment. We oppose an attempt to reverse this policy."

"May I remind you that certain...barbarian wastes have imprisonment for petty things like Jaywalking."

"What your bill needs are a list of crimes that can result in suffrage being lost and prohibiting it for everything else.

"Any government who seeks power by imprisoning voters has larger problems than this draft, ambassador."

His Worshipfulness, the Most Unscrupulous, Plainly Deceitful, Dissembling, Strategicly Calculating Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Sun Nov 04, 2018 6:51 am

"Is the author aware that not all member nations have elections and voting, or at least not ones that anyone but the chosen councilors or committee members was eligible to vote in?"
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
LiberNovusAmericae
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6942
Founded: Mar 10, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby LiberNovusAmericae » Sun Nov 04, 2018 8:51 am

I oppose this. Murderers in prison for example shouldn't have the right to vote, and it opens up the possibility of a politician offering amnesty in exchange for votes.
Last edited by LiberNovusAmericae on Sun Nov 04, 2018 8:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Caracasus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7918
Founded: Apr 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Caracasus » Sun Nov 04, 2018 9:12 am

LiberNovusAmericae wrote:I oppose this. Murderers in prison for example shouldn't have the right to vote, and it opens up the possibility of a politician offering amnesty in exchange for votes.


If the number of prisoners in your nation is so large that it's likely that politicians would gain an advantage in the polls by offering amnesties then your nation is fucked far beyond what a WA resolution could do.

The major pitfall when it comes to prisoner voting really comes from the fact that prisoners are often imprisoned in different towns or counties to the ones they live in. Where would the prisoner cast their vote? For a represntative from their home or for one from where they are imprisoned?
As an editor I seam to spend an awful lot of thyme going threw issues and checking that they're no oblivious errars. Its a tough job but someone's got too do it!



Issues editor, not a moderator.

User avatar
LiberNovusAmericae
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6942
Founded: Mar 10, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby LiberNovusAmericae » Sun Nov 04, 2018 9:41 am

Caracasus wrote:
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:I oppose this. Murderers in prison for example shouldn't have the right to vote, and it opens up the possibility of a politician offering amnesty in exchange for votes.


If the number of prisoners in your nation is so large that it's likely that politicians would gain an advantage in the polls by offering amnesties then your nation is fucked far beyond what a WA resolution could do.

The major pitfall when it comes to prisoner voting really comes from the fact that prisoners are often imprisoned in different towns or counties to the ones they live in. Where would the prisoner cast their vote? For a represntative from their home or for one from where they are imprisoned?

Prisoners can influence small local elections, especially if a prison is located in a very rural area. That being said, I primarily oppose this for punishment reasons. People who committed a major crime shouldn't get to vote until their prison term is up. Assuming that prisoners get to vote though, they should only get to vote for politicians running in their hometown, not where the prison happens to be.
Last edited by LiberNovusAmericae on Sun Nov 04, 2018 9:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Cosmopolitan borovan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1032
Founded: Jan 18, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Cosmopolitan borovan » Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:38 am

Support

User avatar
Liberimery
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 402
Founded: May 27, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Liberimery » Sun Nov 04, 2018 12:32 pm

We will oppose this as well. As a Direct Democracy, the votes of the incarcerated can do much more damage to our own communities than merely possiblely Gerrymander some districts.

User avatar
Marxist Germany
Minister
 
Posts: 2171
Founded: Jun 07, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Marxist Germany » Sun Nov 04, 2018 1:21 pm

Kowani wrote:
Separatist Peoples wrote:"Opposed. Criminals serving sentences are deprived of certain rights, sometimes out of necessity and other times as part of the punitive experience. In the C.D.S.P., prisoners are temporarily disenfranchised for the duration of their incarceration. For a politically active population, this is no small punishment. We oppose an attempt to reverse this policy."

"May I remind you that certain...barbarian wastes have imprisonment for petty things like Jaywalking."

"What your bill needs are a list of crimes that can result in suffrage being lost and prohibiting it for everything else.

I agree
Author of GA#461, GA#470, GA#477, GA#481, GA#486 (co-author), and SC#295

Former delegate of The United Federations; citizen and former Senior Senator of 10000 Islands; 113th Knight of TITO


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: The Ambis

Advertisement

Remove ads