NATION

PASSWORD

Brazil Second Presidential N Paliament Elections 2018 Genral

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Brazil second round Presidential Elections Vote and Post

1 - We support Far Right Wing former army Captain Jair Bolsonaro and retired General Antonio Hamilton Mourão of the Far Right Wing Conservative Social Liberal Party of Brazil for President and Vice President of Brazil.
104
48%
2 - We support Fernando Haddad of the Far Leftist Workers Party of Brazil and Manuela D'avila of the Communist Party of Brazil, together we can win, for President and Vice President of Brazil.
74
34%
3 - We support neither candidates and we vote Blank Ballots, either candidates will be bad for Brazil and the Brazilian people.
37
17%
 
Total votes : 215

User avatar
Virgolia
Attaché
 
Posts: 68
Founded: Apr 19, 2018
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Virgolia » Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:52 pm

Liriena wrote:
Uxupox wrote:
my personal property is my private property.

Private property usually includes personal property, yeah, but the private property of the means of production does not fall under private property and it goes to the chopping block. Unless... I dunno... you have, like, a cute little gun shop or bakery where you are the only one working, I guess?

Why is it bad to have employees? If you don't exploit them and you give them a fair wage then it's okay,you aren't forcing them to work nor taking advantage of them.

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:53 pm

Liriena wrote:
Uxupox wrote:
my personal property is my private property.

Private property usually includes personal property, yeah, but the private property of the means of production does not fall under private property and it goes to the chopping block. Unless... I dunno... you have, like, a cute little gun shop or bakery where you are the only one working, I guess?


Still belongs to me and I'm not going to give my stuff to anybody but me. I worked hard for my belongings and I'd be damned if I let anybody take it from me.
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Bombadil
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18711
Founded: Oct 13, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Bombadil » Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:53 pm

Liriena wrote:
Virgolia wrote:Capitalism is far from perfect,but it's the best system we currently know.

Doesn't mean we can't think of better alternatives, and try to implement them. As you said, it's far from perfect, so why should we settle forever?


Possibly we need to see the worst of it once in a while to understand that votes have consequences, and potentially this will swing back to more centrist and moderate politics.
Eldest, that's what I am...Tom remembers the first raindrop and the first acorn...he knew the dark under the stars when it was fearless — before the Dark Lord came from Outside..

十年

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:53 pm

Germanic Templars wrote:
Liriena wrote:I do not look forward to toll booths on every street. Not at all. :/


Would be cool to see Dominoes pave that hole in my street though that the city hasn't gotten to in the last 2 years or so. :/

Here's a thought: get together with the rest of the neighborhood and get it done cooperatively. Don't put your faith in the good will of Domino's or the city's bureaucracy. :3
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Great Minarchistan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5953
Founded: Jan 08, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Minarchistan » Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:53 pm

Torrocca wrote:
Great Minarchistan wrote:I supported our newly founded libertarian party in these elections, while pushing for Bolsonaro pragmatically in the second round due to the lack of any other good choice. This has been explained for long enough but you apparently insist to call me an enemy of the liberty for supporting authoritarians...


Gee, maybe it has to do with the fucking fact that supporting authoritarianism is intrinsically anti-liberty?

Someone doesnt know what a second round in an election is... :roll:
Awarded for Best Capitalist in 2018 NSG Awards ;')
##############################
Fmr. libertarian, irredeemable bank shill and somewhere inbetween classical liberalism and neoliberalism // Political Compass: +8.75 Economic, -2.25 Social (May 2019)

User avatar
Virgolia
Attaché
 
Posts: 68
Founded: Apr 19, 2018
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Virgolia » Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:55 pm

Liriena wrote:
Virgolia wrote:Capitalism is far from perfect,but it's the best system we currently know.

Doesn't mean we can't think of better alternatives, and try to implement them. As you said, it's far from perfect, so why should we settle forever?

Who said it's forever?
And no,you can't just implement alternative or decide which is better,when the economic decisions of a country start putting it ahead of the others then a new,better economic system will be born.
You can't force an economic change,it took time for capitalism to surpass feudalism.
Last edited by Virgolia on Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Torrocca
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27785
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Torrocca » Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:55 pm

Great Minarchistan wrote:
Torrocca wrote:
Gee, maybe it has to do with the fucking fact that supporting authoritarianism is intrinsically anti-liberty?

Someone doesnt know what a second round in an election is... :roll:


I don't care about that, quite frankly; the fact of the matter is, you went against your pro-liberty facade to help fuck over others in support of authoritarianism.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They call me Torra, but you can call me... anytime (☞⌐■_■)☞
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE 1: Anything depicted IC on this nation does NOT reflect my IRL views or values, and is not endorsed by me.
NOTICE 2: Most RP and every OOC post by me prior to 2023 are no longer endorsed nor tolerated by me. I've since put on my adult pants!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:55 pm

Liriena wrote:
Northern Davincia wrote:However, I did not build my house. Aren't the workers entitled to my house, as the product of their labor?

I'd make houses the exception because, y'know, people need a roof. So long as the workers have homes of their own, it's all good.

I do kinda like the idea of democratizing the Hamptoms, Beverly Hills and Midtown Manhattan tho. A nice bit of reverse gentrification. ;3

That exception is completely arbitrary. You're depriving the workers of their product.
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:56 pm

Virgolia wrote:
Liriena wrote:Private property usually includes personal property, yeah, but the private property of the means of production does not fall under private property and it goes to the chopping block. Unless... I dunno... you have, like, a cute little gun shop or bakery where you are the only one working, I guess?

Why is it bad to have employees? If you don't exploit them and you give them a fair wage then it's okay,you aren't forcing them to work nor taking advantage of them.

I'm not an economist, let alone an expert in Marxist economic theory, but IIRC it's assumed that, in principle, if you are turning a profit, you are not giving your employees a fair wage. And there's a libertarian/anarchist argument that could be made, that a business in which the owner has absolute power over the employees by virtue of owning the means of production, however small the business may be, is an inherently tyrannical and unjust hierarchy, and that it would be better for the functioning of the business to be more horizontal and democratic.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Great Minarchistan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5953
Founded: Jan 08, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Minarchistan » Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:57 pm

Torrocca wrote:
Great Minarchistan wrote:Someone doesnt know what a second round in an election is... :roll:


I don't care about that, quite frankly; the fact of the matter is, you went against your pro-liberty facade to help fuck over others in support of authoritarianism.

Choice 1: low political liberty, good civil liberty, low economic liberty
Choice 2: reasonable political liberty, reasonable civil liberty, high economic liberty

Uhhhh I take the second one, ty
Awarded for Best Capitalist in 2018 NSG Awards ;')
##############################
Fmr. libertarian, irredeemable bank shill and somewhere inbetween classical liberalism and neoliberalism // Political Compass: +8.75 Economic, -2.25 Social (May 2019)

User avatar
Torrocca
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27785
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Torrocca » Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:58 pm

Great Minarchistan wrote:
Torrocca wrote:
I don't care about that, quite frankly; the fact of the matter is, you went against your pro-liberty facade to help fuck over others in support of authoritarianism.

Choice 1: low political liberty, good civil liberty, low economic liberty
Choice 2: reasonable political liberty, reasonable civil liberty, high economic liberty

Uhhhh I take the second one, ty


>Reasonable
>Under a literal authoritarian

Lmao.

I bet you'll still be singing his praises as your civil liberties are eroded.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They call me Torra, but you can call me... anytime (☞⌐■_■)☞
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE 1: Anything depicted IC on this nation does NOT reflect my IRL views or values, and is not endorsed by me.
NOTICE 2: Most RP and every OOC post by me prior to 2023 are no longer endorsed nor tolerated by me. I've since put on my adult pants!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

User avatar
Great Minarchistan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5953
Founded: Jan 08, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Minarchistan » Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:58 pm

Liriena wrote:
Virgolia wrote:Why is it bad to have employees? If you don't exploit them and you give them a fair wage then it's okay,you aren't forcing them to work nor taking advantage of them.

Workers are paid a fair valuation of their worth in the market, else unemployment would be artificially high/low
Awarded for Best Capitalist in 2018 NSG Awards ;')
##############################
Fmr. libertarian, irredeemable bank shill and somewhere inbetween classical liberalism and neoliberalism // Political Compass: +8.75 Economic, -2.25 Social (May 2019)

User avatar
Germanic Templars
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20685
Founded: Jul 01, 2011
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Germanic Templars » Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:59 pm

Torrocca wrote:
Great Minarchistan wrote:Someone doesnt know what a second round in an election is... :roll:


I don't care about that, quite frankly; the fact of the matter is, you went against your pro-liberty facade to help fuck over others in support of authoritarianism.


Maybe this authoritarianism is what's needed to get a shit country off it's feet and being the super power of the south?

  • INTP
  • All American Patriotic Constitutionalist/Classic libertarian (with fiscal conservatism)
  • Religiously Tolerant
  • Roman Catholic
  • Hoplophilic/ammosexual
  • X=3.13, Y=2.41
  • Supports the Blue


I support Capitalism do you? If so, put this in your sig.

XY = Male, XX = Female

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sun Oct 28, 2018 7:00 pm

Northern Davincia wrote:
Liriena wrote:I'd make houses the exception because, y'know, people need a roof. So long as the workers have homes of their own, it's all good.

I do kinda like the idea of democratizing the Hamptoms, Beverly Hills and Midtown Manhattan tho. A nice bit of reverse gentrification. ;3

That exception is completely arbitrary. You're depriving the workers of their product.

I wouldn't say it's arbitrary at all, if you consider the key idea of "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs".
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Great Minarchistan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5953
Founded: Jan 08, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Minarchistan » Sun Oct 28, 2018 7:00 pm

Torrocca wrote:
Great Minarchistan wrote:Choice 1: low political liberty, good civil liberty, low economic liberty
Choice 2: reasonable political liberty, reasonable civil liberty, high economic liberty

Uhhhh I take the second one, ty


>Reasonable
>Under a literal authoritarian

Lmao.

I bet you'll still be singing his praises as your civil liberties are eroded.

As much of an asshole that Bolsonaro is, at least he doesnt formally call for the culling of the Constitution and for the dismantling of the macroeconomic trinity and of the financial system :)
Awarded for Best Capitalist in 2018 NSG Awards ;')
##############################
Fmr. libertarian, irredeemable bank shill and somewhere inbetween classical liberalism and neoliberalism // Political Compass: +8.75 Economic, -2.25 Social (May 2019)

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sun Oct 28, 2018 7:01 pm

Great Minarchistan wrote:Workers are paid a fair valuation of their worth in the market

If the market deems sub-living wages as a fair valuation of workers' worth, the market is fucked up.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Rio Cana
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10821
Founded: Dec 21, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Rio Cana » Sun Oct 28, 2018 7:01 pm

Uxupox wrote:
Liriena wrote:Private property =/= personal property

You can keep your house. You can even keep your toothbrush.


my personal property is my private property.


Have found videos of certain people in the US that are angry since they say that there private property is not really theirs. That it can never really be theirs since they have to pay the government (State/local) property taxes each year. If they do not pay it they get to lose there private property.
Last edited by Rio Cana on Sun Oct 28, 2018 7:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
National Information
Empire of Rio Cana has been refounded.
We went from Empire to Peoples Republic to two divided Republics one called Marina to back to an Empire. And now a Republic under a military General. Our Popular Music
Our National Love SongOur Military Forces
Formerly appointed twice Minister of Defense and once Minister of Foreign Affairs for South America Region.

User avatar
Virgolia
Attaché
 
Posts: 68
Founded: Apr 19, 2018
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Virgolia » Sun Oct 28, 2018 7:02 pm

Liriena wrote:
Virgolia wrote:Why is it bad to have employees? If you don't exploit them and you give them a fair wage then it's okay,you aren't forcing them to work nor taking advantage of them.

I'm not an economist, let alone an expert in Marxist economic theory, but IIRC it's assumed that, in principle, if you are turning a profit, you are not giving your employees a fair wage. And there's a libertarian/anarchist argument that could be made, that a business in which the owner has absolute power over the employees by virtue of owning the means of production, however small the business may be, is an inherently tyrannical and unjust hierarchy, and that it would be better for the functioning of the business to be more horizontal and democratic.

The owner has more power because he has more risks than the employees
If employees deserve more money then they deserve less money when the profits go down.

The owner doesn't have absolute power over the employees.
And no,it won't be better for the business to be more "democratic" because it's not a society nor a state.

User avatar
Torrocca
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27785
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Torrocca » Sun Oct 28, 2018 7:04 pm

Great Minarchistan wrote:
Torrocca wrote:
>Reasonable
>Under a literal authoritarian

Lmao.

I bet you'll still be singing his praises as your civil liberties are eroded.

As much of an asshole that Bolsonaro is, at least he doesnt formally call for the culling of the Constitution and for the dismantling of the macroeconomic trinity and of the financial system :)


Yeah, why formally call for it when you can put up a facade and do it later?

Authoritarianism begets authoritarianism, not liberty.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They call me Torra, but you can call me... anytime (☞⌐■_■)☞
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE 1: Anything depicted IC on this nation does NOT reflect my IRL views or values, and is not endorsed by me.
NOTICE 2: Most RP and every OOC post by me prior to 2023 are no longer endorsed nor tolerated by me. I've since put on my adult pants!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sun Oct 28, 2018 7:04 pm

Uxupox wrote:
Liriena wrote:Private property usually includes personal property, yeah, but the private property of the means of production does not fall under private property and it goes to the chopping block. Unless... I dunno... you have, like, a cute little gun shop or bakery where you are the only one working, I guess?


Still belongs to me and I'm not going to give my stuff to anybody but me. I worked hard for my belongings and I'd be damned if I let anybody take it from me.

Relax dude. Your stoof is probably safe from seizure unless your last name is Soros, Bezos, Bloomberg, Trump or Walton.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Northern Davincia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16960
Founded: Jun 10, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Davincia » Sun Oct 28, 2018 7:06 pm

Liriena wrote:
Northern Davincia wrote:That exception is completely arbitrary. You're depriving the workers of their product.

I wouldn't say it's arbitrary at all, if you consider the key idea of "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs".

That idea is lunacy in ideological format.
Liriena wrote:
Great Minarchistan wrote:Workers are paid a fair valuation of their worth in the market

If the market deems sub-living wages as a fair valuation of workers' worth, the market is fucked up.

Statements like these make me cheer for union-busters all the more.
Hoppean Libertarian, Acolyte of von Mises, Protector of Our Sacred Liberties
Economic Left/Right: 9.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

User avatar
Great Minarchistan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5953
Founded: Jan 08, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Minarchistan » Sun Oct 28, 2018 7:07 pm

Liriena wrote:
Great Minarchistan wrote:Workers are paid a fair valuation of their worth in the market

If the market deems sub-living wages as a fair valuation of workers' worth, the market is fucked up.

Many countries are undeveloped and have a low stock of capital to start with
Awarded for Best Capitalist in 2018 NSG Awards ;')
##############################
Fmr. libertarian, irredeemable bank shill and somewhere inbetween classical liberalism and neoliberalism // Political Compass: +8.75 Economic, -2.25 Social (May 2019)

User avatar
Virgolia
Attaché
 
Posts: 68
Founded: Apr 19, 2018
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Virgolia » Sun Oct 28, 2018 7:08 pm

Liriena wrote:
Uxupox wrote:
Still belongs to me and I'm not going to give my stuff to anybody but me. I worked hard for my belongings and I'd be damned if I let anybody take it from me.

Relax dude. Your stoof is probably safe from seizure unless your last name is Soros, Bezos, Bloomberg, Trump or Walton.

Just curious,did you vote for Del Caño in the last elections?

User avatar
Great Minarchistan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5953
Founded: Jan 08, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Minarchistan » Sun Oct 28, 2018 7:09 pm

Torrocca wrote:
Great Minarchistan wrote:As much of an asshole that Bolsonaro is, at least he doesnt formally call for the culling of the Constitution and for the dismantling of the macroeconomic trinity and of the financial system :)


Yeah, why formally call for it when you can put up a facade and do it later?

Authoritarianism begets authoritarianism, not liberty.

So official signs of authoritarianism prevail over subjective ones when calling for the most anti-liberty candidate? TIL.

Not to say that given its composition, the Congress will likely only filter and pass reforms that improve economic freedom :)
Awarded for Best Capitalist in 2018 NSG Awards ;')
##############################
Fmr. libertarian, irredeemable bank shill and somewhere inbetween classical liberalism and neoliberalism // Political Compass: +8.75 Economic, -2.25 Social (May 2019)

User avatar
Torrocca
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27785
Founded: Dec 01, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Torrocca » Sun Oct 28, 2018 7:10 pm

Great Minarchistan wrote:
Torrocca wrote:
Yeah, why formally call for it when you can put up a facade and do it later?

Authoritarianism begets authoritarianism, not liberty.

So official signs of authoritarianism prevail over subjective ones when calling for the most anti-liberty candidate? TIL.

Not to say that given its composition, the Congress will likely only filter and pass reforms that improve economic freedom :)


Or, more realistically, Bolsonaro's gonna fulfill his promise and reinstate a military dictatorship. GG no re good job helping to kill democracy. :^)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They call me Torra, but you can call me... anytime (☞⌐■_■)☞
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE 1: Anything depicted IC on this nation does NOT reflect my IRL views or values, and is not endorsed by me.
NOTICE 2: Most RP and every OOC post by me prior to 2023 are no longer endorsed nor tolerated by me. I've since put on my adult pants!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Autumn Wind, Celritannia, Decolo, Dimetrodon Empire, Ifreann, Infected Mushroom, Mesogiria, Pale Dawn, Port Carverton, Three Galaxies, Tungstan, Varsemia

Advertisement

Remove ads