NATION

PASSWORD

[PASSED] Condemn Chan Island

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Cobrastantheglorious
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Oct 10, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Cobrastantheglorious » Sat Oct 20, 2018 7:24 am

ı am new to this game can someone explain how can ı do it

User avatar
Sethtekia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 165
Founded: Jun 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Sethtekia » Sat Oct 20, 2018 7:31 am

Ransium wrote:
The World Assembly,

Aware that national leaders across the multiverse are constantly confronted with dilemmas that present no good solution or whose outcomes unexpectedly negatively impact their countries;

Convinced that the source of many of these problems are the covert operations of a single nation, who acts to unleash chaos and mayhem onto the multiverse;

Presenting the nation of Chan Island (which has re-branded itself in a desperate attempt to escape the crimes of its former regime Annihilators of Chan Island), a nation whose desire to spread chaos across all nations is so great that few leaders have been spared the vexation of dealing with its actions;

Shocked to trace at least twenty-four distinct covert operations that impact nations across the multiverse to the regime (fifteen originating from the Annihilators of Chan Island, nine from Chan Island);

Finding each unearthed effort more reprobate and villainous than the last, but, for the sake of brevity, summarizing a few of the most heinous as follows:

  • Operation: That Sinking Feeling - wherein Annihilators of Chan Island were ultimately responsible for the sinking of a passenger ship, killing all occupants while making international emergency services look completely inept;
  • Operation: Police on Overkill Mode? - wherein Annihilators of Chan Island encouraged internal discord in various nations by highlighting and exaggerating police brutality;
  • Operation: Dial L for Loan - wherein Annihilators of Chan Island covertly encouraged cash-strapped nations to take advantage of weaker states for national gain, thus fomenting international strife;
  • Operation: Have War Crimes, Will Travel - wherein Annihilators of Chan Island secretly encouraged world leaders to violate international safe conduct passes in an effort to make an unfavorable environment for international diplomacy;
  • Operation: Guided Missiles and Misguided Men - wherein Chan Island repeatedly leaked information in order to force national leaders into the impossible position of either killing innocent children in a drone strike or letting an infamous terrorist escape;
  • Operation: So... That Worked - wherein Chan Island encouraged civil wars in nations across the multiverse;
Noting the Annihilators of Chan Island's direct assistance in the occupation and destruction of numerous regions including:

Clarifying that Annihilators of Chan Island was not a participant in the use of illegal super-weapons by the latter two organizations;

Concluding that some nations seed chaos in the multiverse merely for the pleasure of watching it burn and that such nations must not go unchallenged by this august body;

Hereby condemns Chan Island.

Co-Authored by Lord Dominator.


War Crimes do not exist. There are no illegal weapons. If you legislate these weapons illegal they are ineffective. Are you going to raid nations that have stock piles of biological weapons and Nerve Agents?

These resolutions are notoriously dangerous as your abusing power to force upon nations. The GNE is disgusted by the abuse of power your using because to win war you gotta break a few eggs. Anything icky is called a war crime by you peoples.
Hail Christ the King Eternally,
Submission to God is Service to the King of Kings

Every Kneel shall bow,
Every Tongue Shall Confess
Christ is the Messiah

AVE CHRISTUS REX AETERNA! AETERNA! AETERNA!

User avatar
The Cascade Regions
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Apr 17, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby The Cascade Regions » Sat Oct 20, 2018 7:53 am

Well written. Full support.

User avatar
Armaros
Diplomat
 
Posts: 628
Founded: Apr 06, 2018
Father Knows Best State

Postby Armaros » Sat Oct 20, 2018 8:01 am

Sethtekia wrote:
There are no illegal weapons.

You mean that illegal tools breaking site rules which are used to attack regions should not be considered "illegal weapons"?
An average Jo.
LWU | TBH | Lazarus | TEP
My opinions are solely mine. I do not speak for regions I'm involved with unless stated otherwise.

User avatar
Ransium
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6788
Founded: Oct 17, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ransium » Sat Oct 20, 2018 8:14 am

Sethtekia wrote:
Ransium wrote:


War Crimes do not exist. There are no illegal weapons. If you legislate these weapons illegal they are ineffective. Are you going to raid nations that have stock piles of biological weapons and Nerve Agents?

These resolutions are notoriously dangerous as your abusing power to force upon nations. The GNE is disgusted by the abuse of power your using because to win war you gotta break a few eggs. Anything icky is called a war crime by you peoples.


Can you explain to me what your problem is OOC? Because I’m lost.

Commended by SC 236,
WA Delegate of Forest from March 20th, 2007 to August 19, 2020.
Author of WA Resolutions: SC 221, SC 224, SC 233, SC 243, SC 265, GA 403, GA 439, GA 445,GA 463,GA 465,
Issues Editor since January 20th, 2017 with some down time.
Author of 27 issues. First editor of 44.
Moderator since November 10th 2017 with some down time.

User avatar
Wrapper
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6020
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wrapper » Sat Oct 20, 2018 8:41 am

Sethtekia wrote:There are no illegal weapons.

The proposal is referring to the Predator scandal. A proposal cannot directly reference the game or any of its game components, or else it would be struck down as illegal under Security Council Rule 4(c). SC authors have creatively found a way around that by equating the usage Predator, a raiding tool that violates site rules, as the usage of illegal weapons.

User avatar
All Wild Things
Diplomat
 
Posts: 526
Founded: Apr 24, 2017
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby All Wild Things » Sat Oct 20, 2018 8:44 am

Picks jaw off floor.
Fantastically well written. Very imaginative approach. Well done!
Browse The NewsStand
Watch the Wild Life

User avatar
Sethtekia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 165
Founded: Jun 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Sethtekia » Sat Oct 20, 2018 2:47 pm

Armaros wrote:
Sethtekia wrote:
There are no illegal weapons.

You mean that illegal tools breaking site rules which are used to attack regions should not be considered "illegal weapons"?


I was not aware he was using illegal tools to the game. I was merely posting from an IC Perspective. If he is using illegal tools that violate the games terms of service then specify that. I have no qualms with torching cheaters.
Hail Christ the King Eternally,
Submission to God is Service to the King of Kings

Every Kneel shall bow,
Every Tongue Shall Confess
Christ is the Messiah

AVE CHRISTUS REX AETERNA! AETERNA! AETERNA!

User avatar
B4kst4br
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby B4kst4br » Sat Oct 20, 2018 3:21 pm

The USSB condemns the use of illegal weapons. While we do not condemn the acts taken by Chan Nation specifically, there is no reason to use such illegal weapons to accomplish it.

User avatar
Tinhampton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13700
Founded: Oct 05, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tinhampton » Sat Oct 20, 2018 3:23 pm

B4kst4br wrote:The USSB condemns the use of illegal weapons. While we do not condemn the acts taken by Chan Nation specifically, there is no reason to use such illegal weapons to accomplish it.

Chan didn't actually use Predator, the "illegal weapons" being alluded to in this proposal.
The Self-Administrative City of TINHAMPTON (pop. 329,537): Saffron Howard, Mayor (UCP); Alexander Smith, WA Delegate-Ambassador

Authorships & co-authorships: SC#250, SC#251, Issue #1115, SC#267, GA#484, GA#491, GA#533, GA#540, GA#549, SC#356, GA#559, GA#562, GA#567, GA#578, SC#374, GA#582, SC#375, GA#589, GA#590, SC#382, SC#385*, GA#597, GA#607, SC#415, GA#647, GA#656, GA#664, GA#671, GA#674, GA#675, GA#677, GA#680, Issue #1580, GA#682, GA#683, GA#684, GA#692, GA#693, GA#715
The rest of my CV: Cup of Harmony 73 champions; Philosopher-Queen of Sophia; *author of the most popular SC Res. ever; anti-NPO cabalist in good standing; 48yo Tory woman w/Asperger's; Cambridge graduate ~ currently reading The World by Simon Sebag Montefiore

User avatar
Lord Dominator
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8900
Founded: Dec 22, 2016
Right-wing Utopia

Postby Lord Dominator » Sat Oct 20, 2018 3:55 pm

Chan did not use Predator, the illegal tool in question, and the resolution states that as specifically as we can.

User avatar
Demiurges
Secretary
 
Posts: 37
Founded: Jul 05, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Demiurges » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:00 pm

Personally I'm against. There is little to condemn aside from making actively morbid issues, that in hindsight, are enjoyable, if only for the fact that all their issues seem to inevitably improve various stats I personally enjoy (DF stat, Weapons Manufacturing, and Scientific Advancement seem to jump by leaps and bounds with) Chans issues that they have authored. Even my economic output improves drastically with said issues, so personally I'm going to vote against. Not to mention this seems more an RP and personal issue, rather than a genuine crisis worth the SC's attention. If they were genuinely doing something wrong that would be one thing, but from this proposal it seems more like a personal grudge against the issues that can easily be 'dismissed' rather than having any real merit to this condemnation.
In the name of commerce, wealth, and war, we prosper.

User avatar
Laugusia
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Oct 19, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Laugusia » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:01 pm

how is it that Chan island was not apprehended before ? yes i agree wit condemning it but perhaps there should be a list of all its crimes posted some where that all nations will see it and if it ever tries to come back they will know what to do

User avatar
Demiurges
Secretary
 
Posts: 37
Founded: Jul 05, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Demiurges » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:02 pm

Sethtekia wrote:
Ransium wrote:


War Crimes do not exist. There are no illegal weapons. If you legislate these weapons illegal they are ineffective. Are you going to raid nations that have stock piles of biological weapons and Nerve Agents?

These resolutions are notoriously dangerous as your abusing power to force upon nations. The GNE is disgusted by the abuse of power your using because to win war you gotta break a few eggs. Anything icky is called a war crime by you peoples.


Agreed.
In the name of commerce, wealth, and war, we prosper.

User avatar
Lord Dominator
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8900
Founded: Dec 22, 2016
Right-wing Utopia

Postby Lord Dominator » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:07 pm

I think people are mistaking that our intention is to punish Chan, which isn't it.
Condemnations are generally seen as rewards, and given the character/nation that Chan plays, it seemed appropriate to write it as a Condemn, and write his issue authoring in a way that makes it sound bad.

User avatar
The Tri State Area and Maine
Envoy
 
Posts: 223
Founded: Feb 02, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tri State Area and Maine » Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:52 pm

Demiurges wrote:Personally I'm against. There is little to condemn aside from making actively morbid issues, that in hindsight, are enjoyable, if only for the fact that all their issues seem to inevitably improve various stats I personally enjoy (DF stat, Weapons Manufacturing, and Scientific Advancement seem to jump by leaps and bounds with) Chans issues that they have authored. Even my economic output improves drastically with said issues, so personally I'm going to vote against. Not to mention this seems more an RP and personal issue, rather than a genuine crisis worth the SC's attention. If they were genuinely doing something wrong that would be one thing, but from this proposal it seems more like a personal grudge against the issues that can easily be 'dismissed' rather than having any real merit to this condemnation.


As LD said, the proposal is rewarding Chan for their efforts, just through a condemnation.

Definitely For.

User avatar
Firstaria
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8409
Founded: Jun 29, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Firstaria » Sun Oct 21, 2018 1:22 am

On one side is a Condemnation. A well-rotten institute that the WA higher chambers don't want to adress the ineffectiveness, even in the face on how some people even take that as a badge of honor.

On the other side, we cannot deny the efforts of the proposer, the details of it...and the fact that our government has a fierce stance against any kind of invader action.

Overall for, but I will misuse this to still give voice to the call for a resolution to the Condemnation ineffectiveness problem.
OVERLORD Daniel Mercury of Firstaria
Original Author of SC #5 and SC #30

User avatar
Tel Maresh
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Oct 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Tel Maresh » Sun Oct 21, 2018 7:03 am

we of Tel Maresh hear the cries of our fellow nations and so give our full support to condemning this sinister nation and their upheaval of the process of this council and this world.


ooc: okay, seriously, it took reading this whole thread before i remembered this is all in fun, so let's keep the too-literal to a minimum to avoid confusing new people like me. in other news, now i know that condemnations are often used as rewards for very active players, so that's cool.

User avatar
Ransium
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 6788
Founded: Oct 17, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Ransium » Sun Oct 21, 2018 7:56 am

Tel Maresh wrote:we of Tel Maresh hear the cries of our fellow nations and so give our full support to condemning this sinister nation and their upheaval of the process of this council and this world.


ooc: okay, seriously, it took reading this whole thread before i remembered this is all in fun, so let's keep the too-literal to a minimum to avoid confusing new people like me. in other news, now i know that condemnations are often used as rewards for very active players, so that's cool.


Don’t worry the SC has many layers. The hardest thing is to take the time to carefully craft something and then have a ton of people completely misinterpret it though, so thanks for taking the time to really understand it.

Commended by SC 236,
WA Delegate of Forest from March 20th, 2007 to August 19, 2020.
Author of WA Resolutions: SC 221, SC 224, SC 233, SC 243, SC 265, GA 403, GA 439, GA 445,GA 463,GA 465,
Issues Editor since January 20th, 2017 with some down time.
Author of 27 issues. First editor of 44.
Moderator since November 10th 2017 with some down time.

User avatar
Firstaria
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8409
Founded: Jun 29, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Firstaria » Mon Oct 22, 2018 9:13 am

OOC: Look dude, it's the first proposal that is not a personal battle between people who cannot sit around a table and talk, and it's well written, so it's gonna pass.

The rest of the argumentation is just about the status of the SC, not you.
OVERLORD Daniel Mercury of Firstaria
Original Author of SC #5 and SC #30

User avatar
Lord Dominator
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8900
Founded: Dec 22, 2016
Right-wing Utopia

Postby Lord Dominator » Tue Oct 23, 2018 10:30 pm

Condemn Chan Island was passed 12,313 votes to 3,536.

User avatar
Chan Island
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6824
Founded: Nov 26, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Chan Island » Wed Oct 24, 2018 12:59 am

A pair of Chan Islander pirates lie on the island's beach, watching a wonderful new sunrise. One of them, assault in hand, turns to the other, and observes, "Is it true that the world hates us?"

The other, surprised to hear this, responds. "Can't think of why. We're an honest, productive island who skim the wealth of others to survive, engage violently on the international stage for our own amusement, and there was that one time we banned everything in the old regime."

"Yeah. You're right. The rest of the world is silly."


Thank you very much NationStates! I am very pleased with this badge, especially for being attached to a resolution so well-written and such an accurate reflection of my time on this site.

Thank you to everyone who voted for, especially Siwale for throwing in that 1000 point vote in so early in the voting. I had heard the TNP was considering voting against too, so "extremely pleased" doesn't begin to describe my reaction upon seeing that.

To those who voted against... thanks for keeping me neurotically checking the polls so frequently. :p

Most of all, none of this would have happened without Ransium and Lord Dominator. For that, there is nothing I can say except that you 2 have oodles of gratitude.

Now, back to Got Issues? I need to stir up some more trouble! :D
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=513597&p=39401766#p39401766
Conserative Morality wrote:"It's not time yet" is a tactic used by reactionaries in every era. "It's not time for democracy, it's not time for capitalism, it's not time for emancipation." Of course it's not time. It's never time, not on its own. You make it time. If you're under fire in the no-man's land of WW1, you start digging a foxhole even if the ideal time would be when you *aren't* being bombarded, because once you wait for it to be 'time', other situations will need your attention, assuming you survive that long. If the fields aren't furrowed, plow them. If the iron is not hot, make it so. If society is not ready, change it.

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads