by The Confederate Territory » Sat Oct 13, 2018 6:49 am
by The Confederate Territory » Sat Oct 13, 2018 6:50 am
by Kuriko » Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:04 am
by New Excalibus » Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:07 am
by Tinhampton » Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:08 am
by Kuriko » Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:09 am
Tinhampton wrote:Is this proposal serious, or was it solely created for the HUE value? Why exactly did you not draft this one beforehand?
by Pergamon » Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:12 am
by Ransium » Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:13 am
The Confederate Territory wrote:The Security Council,
Aware that the Confederation of Corrupt Dictators has often been a target of other regions due to their beliefs alone,
Amazed by the Confederation of Corrupt Dictators' embracing of far right wing ideology,
Admiring of the Confederation of Corrupt Dictators for maintaining diplomatic relations with model conservative regions including The Coalition of Fascist Nations and Nazi Europa,
Inspired by the attempt of the Confederation of Corrupt Dictators to commend themselves,
Also noting that the Confederation of Corrupt Dictators is a region promoting basic national sovereignty to grant nations the freedom of doing as they please in accordance with the Imperial Law,
Believes that the Confederation of Corrupt Dictators deserves a commendation for such admirable traits and actions.
This resolution hereby commends the Confederation of Corrupt Dictators.
by The Confederate Territory » Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:13 am
Tinhampton wrote:Is this proposal serious, or was it solely created for the HUE value? Why exactly did you not draft this one beforehand?
by Tinhampton » Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:15 am
by Jar Wattinree » Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:17 am
Ransium wrote:The Confederate Territory wrote:Believes that the Confederation of Corrupt Dictators deserves a commendation for such admirable traits and actions.
This resolution hereby commends the Confederation of Corrupt Dictators.
I don't think it's accidental that you try to commend an unpopular region for unpopular reasons. I hope others will see this is as the low effort attempt to drum up drama and not take the bait, but it seems unlikely.
by Jocospor » Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:28 am
Tinhampton wrote:Hmmm... a proposal that Commends a region based on being fascist, allying with fascists, imposing fascism on their member states, and trying (and failing) to commend their fascist selves? Eh, I'll pass on this one.
by LiberNovusAmericae » Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:31 am
The Confederate Territory wrote:Good morning all,
The proposal is available here: https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1539431389
Please feel free to leave any feedback on the proposal. All is appreciated!
by New Bremerton » Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:54 am
by The Confederate Territory » Sat Oct 13, 2018 7:56 am
New Bremerton wrote:But if a proposal to liberate or condemn a communist or some other authoritarian region (TCB is neither of these apparently) is put to a vote, it too will have my support, witch hunt or no witch hunt.
by Caracasus » Sat Oct 13, 2018 8:04 am
by The Confederate Territory » Sat Oct 13, 2018 8:06 am
Caracasus wrote:The actual fuck is this? Groundhog day?
by Visionary Union » Sat Oct 13, 2018 8:08 am
by The Confederate Territory » Sat Oct 13, 2018 8:09 am
Visionary Union wrote:Is it April fools day, or just baiting? I'm not sure what is worse, because for a joke, it doesn't amuse anyone save perhaps the author, and I doubt that too many people will rise to the bait.
by Armaros » Sat Oct 13, 2018 8:10 am
by Tinhampton » Sat Oct 13, 2018 8:14 am
The Confederate Territory wrote:Visionary Union wrote:Is it April fools day, or just baiting? I'm not sure what is worse, because for a joke, it doesn't amuse anyone save perhaps the author, and I doubt that too many people will rise to the bait.
This is a legitimate proposal. Do you want me to explain my reasoning behind it? I am more than welcome to.
by Visionary Union » Sat Oct 13, 2018 8:21 am
The Confederate Territory wrote:Visionary Union wrote:Is it April fools day, or just baiting? I'm not sure what is worse, because for a joke, it doesn't amuse anyone save perhaps the author, and I doubt that too many people will rise to the bait.
This is a legitimate proposal. Do you want me to explain my reasoning behind it? I am more than welcome to.
by The Confederate Territory » Sat Oct 13, 2018 8:21 am
Tinhampton wrote:The Confederate Territory wrote:
This is a legitimate proposal. Do you want me to explain my reasoning behind it? I am more than welcome to.
Yes. Wording such as "Amazed by the [CCD's] embracing of far right wing ideology," "model conservative regions including The Coalition of Fascist Nations," and "grant[ing] nations the freedom of doing as they please in accordance with the Imperial Law" (has anybody read it yet?) surely cannot be a coincidence!
by The Confederate Territory » Sat Oct 13, 2018 8:23 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement