by The Philippine Islands of Luzviminda » Mon Oct 01, 2018 4:21 am
by Jebslund » Mon Oct 01, 2018 4:37 am
by Cosmopolitan borovan » Mon Oct 01, 2018 8:15 am
by The New California Republic » Mon Oct 01, 2018 8:20 am
by Dirty Americans » Mon Oct 01, 2018 8:50 am
The New California Republic wrote:OOC: Against. Not that it will pass anyway, because many have tried and failed to repeal it, as everyone knows that any repeal will open up the floodgates to proposals that want to implement a total abortion ban. It's the same with NAPA, people don't want it repealed, as it acts as a blocker to follow-on proposals that aim to ban nuclear weapons.
by The New California Republic » Mon Oct 01, 2018 8:54 am
Dirty Americans wrote:The New California Republic wrote:OOC: Against. Not that it will pass anyway, because many have tried and failed to repeal it, as everyone knows that any repeal will open up the floodgates to proposals that want to implement a total abortion ban. It's the same with NAPA, people don't want it repealed, as it acts as a blocker to follow-on proposals that aim to ban nuclear weapons.
OOC: But you can't (pass a total abortion ban) since you have to repeal On Abortion to pass a total abortion ban.
by Old Hope » Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:13 am
The New California Republic wrote:I'm aware of that, but knocking down RF would likely cause a chain reaction whereby OA would eventually fall too. The first domino won't fall.
Imperium Anglorum wrote:The format wars are a waste of time.
by The New California Republic » Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:15 am
Old Hope wrote:Actually, I am not quite sure about the first statement...
by The New California Republic » Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:19 am
by Dirty Americans » Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:38 am
The New California Republic wrote:I'm aware of that, but knocking down RF would likely cause a chain reaction whereby OA would eventually fall too. The first domino won't fall.
by Frances Francis the First of France » Mon Oct 01, 2018 11:34 am
by Wallenburg » Mon Oct 01, 2018 1:25 pm
by Kenmoria » Mon Oct 01, 2018 1:42 pm
by The Philippine Islands of Luzviminda » Mon Oct 01, 2018 3:51 pm
Dirty Americans wrote:The New California Republic wrote:OOC: Against. Not that it will pass anyway, because many have tried and failed to repeal it, as everyone knows that any repeal will open up the floodgates to proposals that want to implement a total abortion ban. It's the same with NAPA, people don't want it repealed, as it acts as a blocker to follow-on proposals that aim to ban nuclear weapons.
OOC: But you can't (pass a total abortion ban) since you have to repeal On Abortion to pass a total abortion ban. But that shows the whole problem in a nutshell; no one really wants to understand the technical details of resolutions and what they do and that includes people on both sides. As someone who is pro-life in real life I find that the resolution On Abortion has more good than bad but when you try to make everything into simple slogans that appear as black and white cartoons that fact gets lost. Simply put repealing Reproductive Freedoms isn't worth the effort and repealing On Abortion could actually cause more death and destruction than keeping it in place.
by Separatist Peoples » Mon Oct 01, 2018 4:03 pm
The Philippine Islands of Luzviminda wrote:Dirty Americans wrote:
OOC: But you can't (pass a total abortion ban) since you have to repeal On Abortion to pass a total abortion ban. But that shows the whole problem in a nutshell; no one really wants to understand the technical details of resolutions and what they do and that includes people on both sides. As someone who is pro-life in real life I find that the resolution On Abortion has more good than bad but when you try to make everything into simple slogans that appear as black and white cartoons that fact gets lost. Simply put repealing Reproductive Freedoms isn't worth the effort and repealing On Abortion could actually cause more death and destruction than keeping it in place.
I do not aim to completely get rid of abortion but plan to put restrictions on it.
by Wallenburg » Mon Oct 01, 2018 5:25 pm
Separatist Peoples wrote:The Philippine Islands of Luzviminda wrote:I do not aim to completely get rid of abortion but plan to put restrictions on it.
"Ambassador, I imagine you'll end up doubly disappointed. An attempt to repeal Reproductive Freedoms is likely to fail. Assuming you succeed, a fight to swing the pendulum the opposite way is likely even harder. I can think of at least four delegations in this august Assembly who would pour capital into fighting international limits on abortion."
by The Unfounded » Mon Oct 01, 2018 10:46 pm
by Visionary Union » Tue Oct 02, 2018 7:28 am
by Dirty Americans » Tue Oct 02, 2018 10:50 am
Frances Francis the First of France wrote:The only thing that RF does is classify a medal procedure as a medial procedure.
by United Massachusetts » Tue Oct 02, 2018 2:58 pm
by Arasi Luvasa » Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:55 pm
United Massachusetts wrote:United Massachusetts supports any and every attempt to repeal so-called "Reproductive Freedoms", and is willing to the author in further drafting should they so desire.
by Jebslund » Tue Oct 02, 2018 4:10 pm
United Massachusetts wrote:United Massachusetts supports any and every attempt to repeal so-called "Reproductive Freedoms", and is willing to the author in further drafting should they so desire.
by Quiver » Tue Oct 02, 2018 5:13 pm
The New California Republic wrote:OOC: Against. Not that it will pass anyway, because many have tried and failed to repeal it, as everyone knows that any repeal will open up the floodgates to proposals that want to implement a total abortion ban. It's the same with NAPA, people don't want it repealed, as it acts as a blocker to follow-on proposals that aim to ban nuclear weapons.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Desmosthenes and Burke, FlyLands
Advertisement