NATION

PASSWORD

[Abandoned] Repeal Reproductive Freedoms

Where WA members debate how to improve the world, one resolution at a time.
User avatar
The Philippine Islands of Luzviminda
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 135
Founded: Feb 03, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

[Abandoned] Repeal Reproductive Freedoms

Postby The Philippine Islands of Luzviminda » Mon Oct 01, 2018 4:21 am

Recognising abortion is a contentious topic.

Understanding that there are different arguments for each side.

Noting there is a middle ground for this issue

Concerned that the current WA resolution on abortions has no restrictions which means abortion can be performed even if the fetus is developed enough

Knowing that there are other alternatives to abortion for low income persons such as putting the child up for adoption

Arguing that everyone has the right to life

Believing that abortion should at least be restricted

Pointing Out that the WA can impose restrictions that we can agree on if we repeal this bill.

Comforting nations who are pro choice as this does not fully remove the option for abortion due to the resolution: "On Abortion"


The General Assembly, hereby repeals Reproductive Freedoms.

Link to proposal
It is time to put restrictions for the inhumane nature of unrestricted abortions
Last edited by The Philippine Islands of Luzviminda on Wed Oct 03, 2018 5:33 am, edited 3 times in total.
An alt-historical nation loosely based on the Philippines and represents my views except for a few misclicks

User avatar
Jebslund
Minister
 
Posts: 2761
Founded: Sep 14, 2017
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Jebslund » Mon Oct 01, 2018 4:37 am

[OOC: Bit of advice, mate: You may wish to pull this and get advice before you resubmit. As it is, it's not going to pass. You're trying to repeal one of the most popular resolutions in the WA, and there have been other, better-written, attempts that have failed to pass.

In particular, that line about adoption is a lot less convincing than you think (and is the most common argument used), and you've done nothing to address the idea that a fetus, whether or not you consider it to be a person, does not have the right to enslave a woman for 9 months.]

"Another one? Opposed. While it is noble to want a restriction in place to prevent sapient life from being destroyed after achieving sapience, I see no replacement on the docket, and doubt there is one forthcoming.".
Jebslund is a nation of kerbals ruled by Emperor Jebediah Kerman. We reject tyranny, believing that rights should be protected, though we also believe said rights end where the rights of others begin.
Shockingly, we *do* use NS stats, with the exception of lifespan.
Singular sapient: Jebslunder
Plural Sapient: Jebslunden
Singular/Plural nonsapient: Kermanic
Note: When a verb can logically only be done by the sapient using/piloting/holding the object in question, then the appropriate demonym for the number of sapients is used.

Capitalism, Socialism, and Communism are ECONOMIC SYSTEMS. Stop conflating them with political systems.

User avatar
Cosmopolitan borovan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1033
Founded: Jan 18, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Cosmopolitan borovan » Mon Oct 01, 2018 8:15 am

I support but this is not as close as good as UM draft. But yes I agree this won't pass like jebslund say

User avatar
The New California Republic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28752
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Mon Oct 01, 2018 8:20 am

OOC: Against. Not that it will pass anyway, because many have tried and failed to repeal it, as everyone knows that any repeal will open up the floodgates to proposals that want to implement a total abortion ban. It's the same with NAPA, people don't want it repealed, as it acts as a blocker to follow-on proposals that aim to ban nuclear weapons.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Dirty Americans
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 175
Founded: Jun 23, 2017
New York Times Democracy

Postby Dirty Americans » Mon Oct 01, 2018 8:50 am

The New California Republic wrote:OOC: Against. Not that it will pass anyway, because many have tried and failed to repeal it, as everyone knows that any repeal will open up the floodgates to proposals that want to implement a total abortion ban. It's the same with NAPA, people don't want it repealed, as it acts as a blocker to follow-on proposals that aim to ban nuclear weapons.


OOC: But you can't (pass a total abortion ban) since you have to repeal On Abortion to pass a total abortion ban. But that shows the whole problem in a nutshell; no one really wants to understand the technical details of resolutions and what they do and that includes people on both sides. As someone who is pro-life in real life I find that the resolution On Abortion has more good than bad but when you try to make everything into simple slogans that appear as black and white cartoons that fact gets lost. Simply put repealing Reproductive Freedoms isn't worth the effort and repealing On Abortion could actually cause more death and destruction than keeping it in place.
Dirty Americans of The East Pacific
Member of the Tzorsland Puppet Federation
Mike Rowe, Leader / John Henry, Ambassador
Bill Nye Science Guy / Rosie O'Donnel Social Warrior/ Michelle Obama Food Expert

User avatar
The New California Republic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28752
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Mon Oct 01, 2018 8:54 am

Dirty Americans wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:OOC: Against. Not that it will pass anyway, because many have tried and failed to repeal it, as everyone knows that any repeal will open up the floodgates to proposals that want to implement a total abortion ban. It's the same with NAPA, people don't want it repealed, as it acts as a blocker to follow-on proposals that aim to ban nuclear weapons.


OOC: But you can't (pass a total abortion ban) since you have to repeal On Abortion to pass a total abortion ban.

I'm aware of that, but knocking down RF would likely cause a chain reaction whereby OA would eventually fall too. The first domino won't fall.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Old Hope
Diplomat
 
Posts: 971
Founded: Sep 21, 2014
Tyranny by Majority

Postby Old Hope » Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:13 am

The New California Republic wrote:I'm aware of that, but knocking down RF would likely cause a chain reaction whereby OA would eventually fall too. The first domino won't fall.

Actually, I am not quite sure about the first statement...

User avatar
The New California Republic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28752
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:15 am

Old Hope wrote:Actually, I am not quite sure about the first statement...

Huh?
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Old Hope
Diplomat
 
Posts: 971
Founded: Sep 21, 2014
Tyranny by Majority

Postby Old Hope » Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:16 am

The New California Republic wrote:
Old Hope wrote:Actually, I am not quite sure about the first statement...

Huh?

RF being repealed would not necessarily mean that OA will be repealed.

User avatar
The New California Republic
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28752
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:19 am

Old Hope wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:Huh?

RF being repealed would not necessarily mean that OA will be repealed.

Perhaps not, but far more likely, as it would galvanize the pro-life nations and motivate them to seriously push for such a repeal.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Dirty Americans
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 175
Founded: Jun 23, 2017
New York Times Democracy

Postby Dirty Americans » Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:38 am

The New California Republic wrote:I'm aware of that, but knocking down RF would likely cause a chain reaction whereby OA would eventually fall too. The first domino won't fall.


This isn't a domino, this is more like a barbican and On Abortion is more like the main central keep. The keep is massively stronger than the barbican. The battles to replace Reproductive Freedoms would go on for years, never mind any attempt to overturn On Abortion which would be opposed even more strongly than Reproductive Freedoms which is almost as complete a resistance as you can get.

This isn't the place for such debates, but as a pro-life person myself I can argue for pages and pages about why On Abortion is actually a good thing. I would even argue that if the language of On Abortion was introduced int the United States, pro "choice" groups would be lobbying against it because they would insist that it actually restricts a woman's right to choose. I've been around to remember the debates on the previous institution than must never be named. It can easily be much worse and more likely, if repealed would be.
Dirty Americans of The East Pacific
Member of the Tzorsland Puppet Federation
Mike Rowe, Leader / John Henry, Ambassador
Bill Nye Science Guy / Rosie O'Donnel Social Warrior/ Michelle Obama Food Expert

User avatar
Frances Francis the First of France
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Dec 23, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Frances Francis the First of France » Mon Oct 01, 2018 11:34 am

The tone of this repeal effort is downright condescending with its additions of Beliefs and adding a token "Comforting" like we are children who need our hands held. The only thing that RF does is classify a medal procedure as a medial procedure. Consider me a staunch opponent, and if it ever makes it to a vote you can count on my lobbying the entirety of The North Pacific to vote against.

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20784
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Wallenburg » Mon Oct 01, 2018 1:25 pm

Against.
THERE IS NO WAR IN BA SING SE
grestin went through the MKULTRA program and he has more of a free will than wallenburg does - Imperial Idaho
Minister of World Assembly Affairs for The East Pacific

User avatar
Kenmoria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6369
Founded: Jul 03, 2017
Corporate Bordello

Postby Kenmoria » Mon Oct 01, 2018 1:42 pm

(OOC: For a first draft, this isn’t bad. However, the resolution you are trying to repeal has withstood countless repeal attempts by authors with much more experience in the GA, it is at this point essentially impossible to remove. There are other resolutions that are not looked upon as favourably, but I strongly encourage you to get some experience commenting on other people’s drafts before submitting your own.)
A representative democracy with a parliament of 535 seats
Kenmoria is Laissez-Faire on economy but centre-left on social issues
Located in Europe and border France to the right and Spain below
NS stats and policies are not canon, use the factbooks
Not in the WA despite coincidentally following nearly all resolutions
This is due to a problem with how the WA contradicts democracy
However we do have a WA mission and often participate in drafting
Current ambassador: James Lewitt

For more information, read the factbooks here.

User avatar
The Philippine Islands of Luzviminda
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 135
Founded: Feb 03, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Philippine Islands of Luzviminda » Mon Oct 01, 2018 3:51 pm

Dirty Americans wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:OOC: Against. Not that it will pass anyway, because many have tried and failed to repeal it, as everyone knows that any repeal will open up the floodgates to proposals that want to implement a total abortion ban. It's the same with NAPA, people don't want it repealed, as it acts as a blocker to follow-on proposals that aim to ban nuclear weapons.


OOC: But you can't (pass a total abortion ban) since you have to repeal On Abortion to pass a total abortion ban. But that shows the whole problem in a nutshell; no one really wants to understand the technical details of resolutions and what they do and that includes people on both sides. As someone who is pro-life in real life I find that the resolution On Abortion has more good than bad but when you try to make everything into simple slogans that appear as black and white cartoons that fact gets lost. Simply put repealing Reproductive Freedoms isn't worth the effort and repealing On Abortion could actually cause more death and destruction than keeping it in place.

I do not aim to completely get rid of abortion but plan to put restrictions on it.
An alt-historical nation loosely based on the Philippines and represents my views except for a few misclicks

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 15315
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Separatist Peoples » Mon Oct 01, 2018 4:03 pm

The Philippine Islands of Luzviminda wrote:
Dirty Americans wrote:
OOC: But you can't (pass a total abortion ban) since you have to repeal On Abortion to pass a total abortion ban. But that shows the whole problem in a nutshell; no one really wants to understand the technical details of resolutions and what they do and that includes people on both sides. As someone who is pro-life in real life I find that the resolution On Abortion has more good than bad but when you try to make everything into simple slogans that appear as black and white cartoons that fact gets lost. Simply put repealing Reproductive Freedoms isn't worth the effort and repealing On Abortion could actually cause more death and destruction than keeping it in place.

I do not aim to completely get rid of abortion but plan to put restrictions on it.

"Ambassador, I imagine you'll end up doubly disappointed. An attempt to repeal Reproductive Freedoms is likely to fail. Assuming you succeed, a fight to swing the pendulum the opposite way is likely even harder. I can think of at least four delegations in this august Assembly who would pour capital into fighting international limits on abortion."

His Worshipfulness Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20784
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Wallenburg » Mon Oct 01, 2018 5:25 pm

Separatist Peoples wrote:
The Philippine Islands of Luzviminda wrote:I do not aim to completely get rid of abortion but plan to put restrictions on it.

"Ambassador, I imagine you'll end up doubly disappointed. An attempt to repeal Reproductive Freedoms is likely to fail. Assuming you succeed, a fight to swing the pendulum the opposite way is likely even harder. I can think of at least four delegations in this august Assembly who would pour capital into fighting international limits on abortion."

"Ambassador Bell is correct. The Wallenburgian delegation, among others, would move to submit a replacement with even firmer pro-choice mandates."
THERE IS NO WAR IN BA SING SE
grestin went through the MKULTRA program and he has more of a free will than wallenburg does - Imperial Idaho
Minister of World Assembly Affairs for The East Pacific

User avatar
Faltasia
Secretary
 
Posts: 26
Founded: Jan 24, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Faltasia » Mon Oct 01, 2018 10:39 pm

This lacks compassion in the language. On that alone, Faltasia says no.

User avatar
The Unfounded
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 102
Founded: Oct 07, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Unfounded » Mon Oct 01, 2018 10:46 pm

"Categorically against!" Alexis lobs a muffin towards the podium. "BOOOOOO!"
Godulan Puppet and WA member, now representing the Shirassi faction in 'official capacity'

The Servants of the True Way of the Will: A multi-galactic anti-technology crusade that plies the stars in vessels shaped with the power of their own minds. To give up your material devices and trinkets is to learn how to access the true power that all can wield.

A 1.09 civilization, according to this Nation Index Thingie

User avatar
Visionary Union
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 137
Founded: Sep 16, 2018
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Visionary Union » Tue Oct 02, 2018 7:28 am

rubs hands excitedly, inhales air (BOIIII [non verbal])
Well, as I'm sure you picked up from previous comments, this repeal won't pass because no one wants the absolute horror of trying to redraft RF, repealing OA, or anything related to abortion rights. Your draft doesn't mention anything at all about this "middle ground". Also, you mention that everyone has a right for life. But did you define in your resolution from what stage does the fetus transforms from a mere collection of cells to a sentient being who holds that right? No, redraft if you truly insist, but as of now this won't pass.
Last edited by Visionary Union on Tue Oct 02, 2018 7:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Dirty Americans
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 175
Founded: Jun 23, 2017
New York Times Democracy

Postby Dirty Americans » Tue Oct 02, 2018 10:50 am

Frances Francis the First of France wrote:The only thing that RF does is classify a medal procedure as a medial procedure.

No that is not true. RF requires that no impediment to abortion (save for that which would be normally applied to a procedure "of similar risk and complexity") be allowed for abortions up until the point where the person is no longer pregnant. In short it legalizes all abortion.

This is an extreme standard even in the real world where impediments are placed in several nations on abortions late in pregnancy. But NationStates tends to go to extreme ends so I suppose I shouldn't complain.
Dirty Americans of The East Pacific
Member of the Tzorsland Puppet Federation
Mike Rowe, Leader / John Henry, Ambassador
Bill Nye Science Guy / Rosie O'Donnel Social Warrior/ Michelle Obama Food Expert

User avatar
United Massachusetts
Minister
 
Posts: 2574
Founded: Jan 17, 2016
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby United Massachusetts » Tue Oct 02, 2018 2:58 pm

United Massachusetts supports any and every attempt to repeal so-called "Reproductive Freedoms", and is willing to the author in further drafting should they so desire.

User avatar
Arasi Luvasa
Diplomat
 
Posts: 640
Founded: Aug 29, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Arasi Luvasa » Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:55 pm

United Massachusetts wrote:United Massachusetts supports any and every attempt to repeal so-called "Reproductive Freedoms", and is willing to the author in further drafting should they so desire.

Arasi Luvasa is also in support, any help that can be provided from this end will be given.
Ambassador Ariela Galadriel Maria Mirase
37 year old Arch-bishop of the Arasi Christian Church (also the youngest ever arch-bishop and fifth woman in the church hierarchy). An attractive but stern woman with a strict adherence to religious and moral ethical codes, also somewhat of an optimist. She was recently appointed to the position following the election of Adrian Midnight to the position of Patriarch.

User avatar
Jebslund
Minister
 
Posts: 2761
Founded: Sep 14, 2017
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Jebslund » Tue Oct 02, 2018 4:10 pm

United Massachusetts wrote:United Massachusetts supports any and every attempt to repeal so-called "Reproductive Freedoms", and is willing to the author in further drafting should they so desire.

Haven't you *already* authored a failed repeal attempt?
Jebslund is a nation of kerbals ruled by Emperor Jebediah Kerman. We reject tyranny, believing that rights should be protected, though we also believe said rights end where the rights of others begin.
Shockingly, we *do* use NS stats, with the exception of lifespan.
Singular sapient: Jebslunder
Plural Sapient: Jebslunden
Singular/Plural nonsapient: Kermanic
Note: When a verb can logically only be done by the sapient using/piloting/holding the object in question, then the appropriate demonym for the number of sapients is used.

Capitalism, Socialism, and Communism are ECONOMIC SYSTEMS. Stop conflating them with political systems.

User avatar
Quiver
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 11
Founded: Jan 07, 2015
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Quiver » Tue Oct 02, 2018 5:13 pm

The New California Republic wrote:OOC: Against. Not that it will pass anyway, because many have tried and failed to repeal it, as everyone knows that any repeal will open up the floodgates to proposals that want to implement a total abortion ban. It's the same with NAPA, people don't want it repealed, as it acts as a blocker to follow-on proposals that aim to ban nuclear weapons.

OOC: What is NAPA?

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General Assembly

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Mendevia

Advertisement

Remove ads