Imperium Anglorum wrote:Uan aa Boa wrote:We believe it has been rushed to submission in a manner disrespectful to the Assembly's drafting process, leaving it visibly unpolished with punctuation issues and inconsistent capitalisation
Really? Where is it? You had opportunity to comment on it too. In fact, you had three days to do so. There are literally no comments on the proposal having anything to do with its text, except Auralia's and the recurring question of whether something should be a blocker or not. And unless you're going to tell me that the proposal is in stone when it is submitted (not really, since when it comes to votes, it's really only in stone when the campaign goes out as you can't take it back or get stamps refunded), you've had ample opportunity to review it.
Whatever I was doing in NS or real life I evidently missed whatever sized window of opportunity there was between the opening of this thread and the submission of the proposal. I'd love to think that you value my opinion sufficiently to withdraw a submitted proposal because of it, and if you're saying here that this is the case then I might comment in more detail on your submitted proposals in the future. I tend to assume that campaigns go out along with submission, but as I'm not a delegate I don't get to see when the telegrams are sent.