Repeal "On Universal Jurisdiction claims that "victims of war crimes and other crimes against humanity are unlikely to receive justice, as (i) even when prosecutions occur, they will likely be in friendly jurisdictions, meaning that they will be slaps on the wrist and (ii) section 3(b) prohibits a second trial, even when punishment is minimal to nonexistent,"
However section 3(b) of On Universal Jurisdiction only applies to defendants if they had already received a fair trial. A trial in which the defendant was never at risk of facing justice in the first place, as described in (i) can hardly be described as fair. The claim that 3(b) prohibits retrial in this instance is therefore false, and by extension the claim that the resolution presents a barrier in victims seek justice is also false.
To paraphrase some ruling I can't be bothered to look up "double jeopardy requires that the defendant must have been in jeopardy in the first place."
You make now begin complaining about my tardiness in submitting this challenge in order to avoid discussing the merits of the challenge itself. In my defense it is late as I had once again made the mistake of having faith in this body and assumed it would be marked as illegal before it went to vote.